本文選題：商標 + 新商標法��； 參考：《廣東外語外貿(mào)大學》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：商標權(quán)獲得保護的依據(jù)以及保護范圍都是以避免造成商標混淆為基礎的。使用“混淆可能性”標準作為承擔商標侵權(quán)責任的法律要件,是商標理論發(fā)展的必然結(jié)果。商標混淆不斷出現(xiàn)各種新的形式,引起了我國立法界和司法界的極大重視。新修訂的《中華人民共和國商標法》中,混淆理論貫穿了商標申請、管理、確權(quán)、維權(quán)的每一個環(huán)節(jié),并且增加了“導致混淆”的限定,明確將“混淆可能性”作為商標侵權(quán)的要件�？梢�,“混淆可能性”理論在新商標法中的地位和作用得到重視。但是,新《商標法》尚未明確混淆可能性的概念,這對中國商標法的發(fā)展和應對國際挑戰(zhàn)是十分不利的。本文第一章詳細闡述了商標的概念和作用以及商標混淆理論。從商標混淆的主體和客體出發(fā),深入地分析了商標混淆理論的內(nèi)容,并且分析了商標混淆理論的發(fā)展趨勢。本文第二章通過各種涉外定牌加工案例,以及學術(shù)界的不同觀點,對商標混淆可能性在我國立法和司法中的運用情況進行詳細分析。本文第三章通過分析“混淆可能性”概念的界定,詳細地分析了我國現(xiàn)行商標混淆侵權(quán)認定標準的不足。本文第四章從商標混淆認定標準具體考量因素與侵權(quán)范圍出發(fā),論述我國商標混淆理論以及商標混淆侵權(quán)認定的完善。綜上所述,本文認為應該借鑒各國商標混淆侵權(quán)認定的標準,進一步完善我國商標法,將商標保護由管理導向轉(zhuǎn)為自治保護導向,才是解決問題的關(guān)鍵。
[Abstract]:The basis and scope of trademark protection are based on avoiding trademark confusion. It is the inevitable result of the development of trademark theory to use the criterion of "confusion possibility" as the legal requirement to bear the liability for trademark infringement. Various new forms of trademark confusion continue to appear, which has aroused great attention of the legislative and judicial circles in our country. In the newly revised Trademark Law of the people's Republic of China, the theory of confusion runs through every aspect of trademark application, administration, confirmation and protection of rights, and adds a limit to "lead to confusion." Clearly regard "confusion possibility" as the element of trademark infringement. It can be seen that the position and function of the theory of obfuscation possibility in the new trademark law have been attached importance to. However, the new Trademark Law has not clearly confused the concept of possibility, which is very disadvantageous to the development of China's Trademark Law and to meet the international challenges. The first chapter elaborates the concept and function of trademark and the theory of trademark confusion. Starting from the subject and object of trademark confusion, this paper analyzes the content of trademark confusion theory, and analyzes the development trend of trademark confusion theory. In the second chapter, the author makes a detailed analysis of the application of the possibility of trademark confusion in the legislation and judicature of our country through various cases of foreign licensing processing and different viewpoints of academic circles. In the third chapter, by analyzing the definition of the concept of "confusion possibility", the author analyzes in detail the deficiency of the existing standards of trademark confusion infringement in China. The fourth chapter discusses the theory of trademark confusion and the perfection of trademark confusion tort from the specific consideration of the criteria of trademark confusion and the scope of infringement. To sum up, this paper holds that the key to solve the problem is to draw lessons from the standards of trademark confusion infringement in various countries, further improve our trademark law, and change the trademark protection from management to autonomous protection.
【學位授予單位】：廣東外語外貿(mào)大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923.43

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 徐聰穎;;“混淆之虞”,抑或“顯著性受損之虞”?——對我國商標侵權(quán)認定標準的再思考[J];河北法學;2012年10期

，

本文編號：2003399