本文選題：意思表示 + 區(qū)分模式�。� 參考：《法制博覽》2016年06期

【摘要】：動機(jī)錯誤是意思表示錯誤的重要類型,法律對動機(jī)錯誤是否應(yīng)予以規(guī)范歷來飽受爭議,大陸法國家立法大多規(guī)定了動機(jī)錯誤制度,而我國僅有"重大誤解"條款作為錯誤規(guī)范,且一刀切地將動機(jī)錯誤排除在外。比較德日錯誤制度立法例,我國應(yīng)當(dāng)對表示錯誤與動機(jī)錯誤作一元評價,并確立影響意思表示效力的要件,幫助法官在自由裁量的過程中謀求錯誤者保護(hù)與交易安全的平衡點(diǎn)。
[Abstract]:The error of motive is an important type of error of expression of intention. Whether the error of motive should be regulated by law has always been controversial. Most of the national legislations of continental law have stipulated the system of error of motive, but only the clause of "significant misunderstanding" is regarded as the wrong norm in our country. And in a one-size-fits-all way, the error of motive is excluded. Comparing the legislation of German and Japanese error system, our country should make a monistic evaluation on the error of expression and the error of motive, and establish the elements that affect the effectiveness of the expression of intention, so as to help the judge to seek the balance point between the protection of the wrongdoer and the safety of transaction in the process of discretion.
【作者單位】： 華東政法大學(xué);
【分類號】：D913
，

本文編號：2003038