本文選題：網(wǎng)頁快照 + 提供行為��； 參考：《青島大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：在網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)飛速發(fā)展的今天,網(wǎng)頁快照等新技術(shù)逐漸走進(jìn)了人們的視野,為訪問用戶帶來極速體驗(yàn)的同時,也在挑戰(zhàn)著作品著作權(quán)人的權(quán)利底線。網(wǎng)頁快照服務(wù)模式的產(chǎn)生和發(fā)展是網(wǎng)絡(luò)信息技術(shù)發(fā)展到一定階段的產(chǎn)物,它在提升網(wǎng)絡(luò)用戶搜索效率、便于用戶利用關(guān)鍵詞快速查詢、彌補(bǔ)原始網(wǎng)頁被刪除或鏈接失效時獲知原始內(nèi)容等方面具有無可替代的優(yōu)勢。網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)也存在著侵害網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)、掠奪用戶資源、實(shí)施不正當(dāng)競爭等侵權(quán)可能,在網(wǎng)絡(luò)新技術(shù)與權(quán)利人利益的博弈中,如何在司法實(shí)踐中準(zhǔn)確把握“實(shí)質(zhì)替代”、“提供行為”、“正常使用”和“不合理損害”等要點(diǎn)成為人民法院對網(wǎng)頁快照侵權(quán)認(rèn)定和司法裁判的關(guān)鍵。本文擬從網(wǎng)頁快照提供行為的侵權(quán)認(rèn)定角度展開分析,以期為司法認(rèn)定、法律規(guī)制和審判實(shí)務(wù)提供一點(diǎn)參考。本文分為五個部分。第一部分為引言;第二部分從技術(shù)層面分析概括網(wǎng)頁快照的概念、工作原理及特征,從而探討網(wǎng)頁快照在技術(shù)層面和法律層面的性質(zhì),為接下來闡述侵權(quán)認(rèn)定做好鋪墊;第三部分結(jié)合司法解釋對網(wǎng)頁快照提供行為進(jìn)行法律解讀和侵權(quán)認(rèn)定,并結(jié)合國內(nèi)外典型案例為司法裁判提供更多的視角與思路;第四部分重點(diǎn)探討了網(wǎng)頁快照提供行為的侵權(quán)抗辯,從“正常使用”和“不合理損害”兩個角度闡述提供行為的違法阻卻事由,進(jìn)一步論述利益平衡原則、合理使用制度引入網(wǎng)頁快照提供行為侵權(quán)抗辯的可行性和必要性;第五部分作為本文的核心,在審視現(xiàn)存著作權(quán)法體系中存在的問題的基礎(chǔ)上,為網(wǎng)頁快照提供行為的侵權(quán)認(rèn)定及其規(guī)制提出有指導(dǎo)性的立法與司法建議。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of network technology, new technologies, such as web snapshot, have gradually come into people's view, which bring users extremely rapid experience, but also challenge the bottom line of copyright owners' rights. The generation and development of web snapshot service model is the product of the development of network information technology to a certain stage. It improves the search efficiency of network users and facilitates users to use keywords to query quickly. It has irreplaceable advantages to make up for the original content when the original page is deleted or the link fails. Network technology also has the possibility of infringing upon network communication right, plundering users' resources, carrying out unfair competition and so on. In the game between the new network technology and the interests of the obligee, how to accurately grasp the "substantial substitution" in judicial practice? The key points of "providing behavior", "normal use" and "unreasonable damage" become the key points for the people's court to determine the infringement of web page snapshot and the judicial decision. This paper intends to analyze the infringement of the provision of web snapshot, in order to provide some reference for judicial identification, legal regulation and trial practice. This paper is divided into five parts. The first part is the introduction; the second part analyzes and generalizes the concept, working principle and characteristic of the web page snapshot from the technical level, thus discusses the nature of the web page snapshot in the technical level and the legal level, paving the way for the next elaboration of the tort cognizance; The third part of the judicial interpretation of the provision of web page snapshots of the act of legal interpretation and tort, and combined with typical cases at home and abroad to provide more perspective and ideas for the judicial decision; The fourth part mainly discusses the tort defense of the provision of web page snapshot, expounds the reasons of illegal obstruction from the two angles of "normal use" and "unreasonable damage", and further discusses the principle of balance of interests. As the core of this paper, the fifth part, on the basis of examining the problems existing in the existing copyright law system, This paper puts forward some instructive legislative and judicial suggestions for the tort cognizance and regulation of web snapshot.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：青島大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 武s，

本文編號：1988169