本文選題：民法平等原則 + 法律人格��； 參考：《浙江大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：總結(jié)"屈從"概念的演變與民事屈從的成因,筆者認(rèn)為"民事屈從"含有兩層含義。其一,是指"屈從狀態(tài)",即反映當(dāng)事人之間的地位的不對等的法律狀態(tài)。這里的屈從并不是指民事生活現(xiàn)象,而是指在某些相對法律關(guān)系中,因法律規(guī)范直接設(shè)定或承認(rèn)導(dǎo)致的當(dāng)事人地位不對等的法律狀態(tài)。這里的"屈從"并不針對抽象意義上的法律地位或法律人格而言,而是指在具體情勢下,當(dāng)事人之間中因權(quán)利配置的位階差異所導(dǎo)致"一方當(dāng)事人因被授予了某種單方塑造法律關(guān)系的權(quán)限"所帶來的地位差異。其二,就法律關(guān)系的內(nèi)容構(gòu)成而言,"屈從"作為構(gòu)成內(nèi)容與相對應(yīng)的"權(quán)限",被視為除了權(quán)利與義務(wù)之外,構(gòu)成某些民事法律關(guān)系的重要內(nèi)容。民法平等理論與民事屈從理論分別處在民法系統(tǒng)的不同維度,前者在原則層面,后者在規(guī)則層面;但又相互影響,兩者的聯(lián)結(jié)點(diǎn)就在于"實(shí)質(zhì)平等"。在實(shí)質(zhì)平等的旨意下,高度抽象的形式平等與合理的民事屈從互為兼容。民事屈從理論作為民法理論的失落地帶,若能就此沖破傳統(tǒng)民法平等理論的偏見,便能得到正視與發(fā)展,既能豐滿我國的民法理論,又能為民事立法與司法提供指導(dǎo)意義。
[Abstract]:Summing up the evolution of the concept of "subordination" and the causes of civil subordination, the author thinks that "civil subordination" contains two meanings. First, it refers to the state of submission, that is, the unequal legal state which reflects the status of the parties. Subordination here does not refer to the phenomenon of civil life, but rather refers to the unequal legal status of the parties caused by the direct establishment or recognition of the legal norms in some relative legal relations. "subordination" here does not refer to legal status or legal personality in an abstract sense, but rather to specific situations, The difference of status between the parties caused by the difference in the order of rights allocation, "one party has been granted some unilateral authority to shape the legal relationship". Second, as far as the content composition of legal relations is concerned, "submission" as a constituent content and corresponding "authority" is regarded as the important content of some civil legal relations besides rights and obligations. The equality theory of civil law and the theory of civil subservience lie in different dimensions of civil law system. The former lies in the level of principle and the latter at the level of rules. Under the will of substantive equality, highly abstract formal equality and reasonable civil subordination are compatible with each other. The theory of civil subordination, as the lost zone of the theory of civil law, if it can break through the prejudice of the traditional theory of equality of civil law, can be faced squarely and developed, which can not only enrich the theory of civil law in our country, but also provide guidance for civil legislation and judicature.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 徐國棟;;評析三個(gè)民法總則草案中的平等規(guī)定——從平等撤退的端倪以及可能的發(fā)展[J];暨南學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2015年07期

2 蔡立東;;“平等主體關(guān)系說”的棄與留——未來《民法典》調(diào)整對象條款之抉擇[J];法學(xué)論壇;2015年02期

3 魏波;;民事行為能力制度的歷史演進(jìn)與路徑分析[J];喀什師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年02期

4 申衛(wèi)星;對民事法律關(guān)系內(nèi)容構(gòu)成的反思[J];比較法研究;2004年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：1918879