發(fā)布時間：2018-05-18 23:41

  本文選題：融資租賃 + 出租人��； 參考：《煙臺大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：以司法審判中的真實案例作為引導(dǎo),描述了當前我國融資租賃出租人的權(quán)利。目前,我國融資租賃出租人的保護現(xiàn)狀不容樂觀,承租人中途解約、破產(chǎn)、無權(quán)處分、未按約定支付租金等因素,不僅使出租人權(quán)益受損,更不利于融資租賃行業(yè)的健康發(fā)展。融資租賃的相關(guān)立法缺失,融資租賃行業(yè)也沒有形成完整的防護機制,2014年最高院《關(guān)于審理融資租賃合同糾紛案件的解釋》的出臺固然對融資租賃交易的發(fā)展提供了新的契機,但是其中許多規(guī)定不夠?qū)嶋H,沒有配套的法律和系統(tǒng)作支撐,無法得到有效的實施。針對現(xiàn)行法律規(guī)定的缺失造成的融資租賃出租人權(quán)益受損的情況,提出要保護融資租賃出租人的合法權(quán)益,促進融資租賃業(yè)的繁榮,必須要建立完善的禁止承租人中途解約機制,統(tǒng)一相關(guān)規(guī)定;完善我國的二手市場,在承租人破產(chǎn)的情況下保證出租人的優(yōu)先受償權(quán),并由行業(yè)帶頭,建立風(fēng)險防控機制;我國當前的物權(quán)登記制度很單調(diào)簡單,應(yīng)當盡快建立動產(chǎn)的登記對抗制度,并建立統(tǒng)一的動產(chǎn)與不動產(chǎn)登記系統(tǒng);執(zhí)行租賃物以支付承租人未按約定支付的租金,同時總結(jié)《開普敦公約》中與我國有關(guān)的規(guī)定,建議賦予當事人一些快速救濟的權(quán)利。
[Abstract]:Under the guidance of the real cases in the judicial trial, this paper describes the rights of the financial lessors in our country. At present, the present situation of the protection of financial lessor in China is not optimistic, the lessee terminates the contract midway, goes bankrupt, has no right to dispose, does not pay the rent according to the agreement and so on, not only causes the lessor's rights and interests to be damaged, but also is unfavorable to the healthy development of the finance lease industry. The absence of relevant legislation on financial leasing and the lack of a complete protection mechanism in the financial leasing industry have provided a new opportunity for the development of financial leasing transactions, although the introduction of the Supreme Court of 2014 "on the interpretation of cases concerning the trial of disputes over Financial Lease contracts" has provided a new opportunity for the development of financial leasing transactions. However, many of them are not practical and can not be effectively implemented without supporting laws and systems. In view of the damage to the rights and interests of the financial lessor caused by the absence of the current laws and regulations, it is proposed to protect the lawful rights and interests of the financial lessor and promote the prosperity of the financial leasing industry. We must establish a perfect mechanism to prohibit the lessee from terminating the contract halfway, unify the relevant regulations, perfect the second-hand market of our country, guarantee the lessor's priority right of repayment in the case of lessee's bankruptcy, and take the lead by the industry to establish the mechanism of risk prevention and control. The current registration system of real right in our country is very monotonous and simple, so we should set up the registration countermeasure system of movable property as soon as possible, set up a unified registration system of movable property and immovable property, execute the lease item to pay the rent which the lessee has not paid according to the agreement, At the same time, the provisions of Cape Town Convention related to our country are summarized, and it is suggested that the parties should be given some rights of quick relief.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：煙臺大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D923.6

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王瑜;陳惟梁;;論融資租賃出租人權(quán)利的民法保護[J];西南民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(人文社科版);2016年10期

2 王葉剛;;融資租賃承租人擅自處分租賃物時出租人法定解除權(quán)反思[J];法學(xué);2016年08期

3 李善川;;融資租賃合同中出租人的權(quán)利保護[J];時代金融;2016年12期

4 郝秀輝;張納川;;論航空器融資租賃出租人的違約取回權(quán)[J];西南石油大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2016年01期

5 徐偉功;林翠珠;;我國融資租賃交易中出租方的法律地位探析[J];湖南社會科學(xué);2015年03期

6 孫憲忠;;不動產(chǎn)登記基本范疇解析[J];法學(xué)家;2014年06期

7 曾大鵬;;融資租賃法制創(chuàng)新的體系化思考[J];法學(xué);2014年09期

8 高圣平;;基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施融資租賃交易:現(xiàn)實與法律困境 從基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施投融資改革的視角[J];中外法學(xué);2014年03期

9 雷繼平;原爽;李志剛;;交易實踐與司法回應(yīng):融資租賃合同若干法律問題——《最高人民法院關(guān)于審理融資租賃合同糾紛案件適用法律問題的解釋》解讀[J];法律適用;2014年04期

10 高圣平;;中國融資租賃法制:權(quán)利再造與制度重塑——以《開普敦公約》及相關(guān)議定書為參照[J];中國人民大學(xué)學(xué)報;2014年01期

，

本文編號：1907750