本文選題：公知常識 + 創(chuàng)造性��； 參考：《電子知識產(chǎn)權》2017年03期

【摘要】：專利法律法規(guī)缺少公知常識的明確定義以及僅從來源角度對公知常識的栽體進行開放式的列舉,造成了公知常識認定的隨意性及模糊性。以栽體來源作為認定公知常識的判斷標準是業(yè)界的普遍做法,但卻是對"公知常識的認定"的誤讀�；貧w創(chuàng)造性判斷的基本框架內(nèi),將"公知常識的認定"與"創(chuàng)造性判斷"有機聯(lián)系,充分考量創(chuàng)造性判斷中各種實質性要素對認定公知常識的影響,構建并適用"技術領域——技術問題——技術啟示"的認定標準,才能正確地認定公知常識。
[Abstract]:The lack of a clear definition of common knowledge in patent laws and regulations and the open enumeration of common knowledge only from the source point of view result in the arbitrariness and fuzziness of common knowledge. It is a common practice in the industry to judge common knowledge by using the source of planting body as the judgment standard, but it is a misreading of the recognition of common knowledge. Return to the basic frame of creative judgment, link "common sense of public knowledge" with "creative judgment" organically, and fully consider the influence of various substantive elements in creative judgment on the recognition of common knowledge. Only by constructing and applying the standard of "technical field-technical problem-technological enlightenment" can we correctly identify common knowledge.
【作者單位】： 華誠律師事務所;
【分類號】：D923.42
，

本文編號：1901760