本文選題：自主決定權 + 歸責原則��； 參考：《天津師范大學》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：近年來,醫(yī)患糾紛的增多使得醫(yī)患關系成為社會關注的焦點,而侵害患方自主決定權是產(chǎn)生醫(yī)患關系緊張的原因之一。文章第—部分對患方自主決定權的基本范疇進行界定,包括其內涵、外延并界定其客體主要是知情同意權、隱私披露權與個人信息控制權；第二部分是侵害患方自主決定權行為的類別分析,結合《侵權責任法》等相關法律的規(guī)定,從解釋論視角探討具體侵害患方自主決定權行為的違法性認定問題。第三部分是侵害患方自主決定權的歸責原則,分具體情況適用不同歸責原則,一般采用過錯責任原則,侵權責任法第58條列舉的三種情況同樣適用侵害患方自主決權的損害；第四部分闡述了侵害患方自主決定權所造成的損害與賠償,其特點是損害具有獨立性,即僅侵害了患方的自主決定權,哪怕是沒有造成身體上的損害,醫(yī)療機構也應當賠償,在責任承擔中,應該慎用公平分擔損失原則。通過研究該論題,以期對侵害患方自主決定權的這類侵權責任和損害賠償有更為全面和直觀的認識,平衡醫(yī)患利益,促進醫(yī)療事業(yè)健康發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the increase of doctor-patient disputes makes the doctor-patient relationship become the focus of social attention, and infringement of the patient's autonomy is one of the causes of the tension between doctors and patients. In the first part of the article, the author defines the basic category of the patient's independent decision, including its connotation, extension and definition of its object: the right of informed consent, the right of privacy disclosure and the right of control of personal information. The second part is the category analysis of the behavior of infringing the parties' autonomy, combining with the provisions of the Tort liability Law and other relevant laws, from the perspective of interpretation theory to discuss the violation of the autonomy of the parties to determine the illegal nature of the act. The third part is the principle of imputation of infringing the patient's independent decision power, which applies different imputation principle according to the specific situation, generally adopts the fault liability principle, and the three cases listed in Article 58 of the Tort liability Law also apply to the damage of infringing the patient's independent decision right; The fourth part describes the damage and compensation caused by the infringement of the patient's autonomy, which is characterized by the independence of the damage, that is, only the infringement of the patient's autonomy, even if it does not cause physical damage, the medical institution should also compensate. The principle of fair sharing of losses should be used carefully in the course of responsibility. By studying this topic, the author hopes to have a more comprehensive and intuitive understanding of the tort liability and compensation for infringement of the patient's independent decision, to balance the interests of doctors and patients, and to promote the healthy development of the medical cause.
【學位授予單位】：天津師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 葉銘芬;;論侵權責任法對法益的保護——兼評《侵權責任法》第2條、第6條、第7條之規(guī)定[J];研究生法學;2010年03期

2 胡永慶;知情同意理論中醫(yī)生說明義務的構成[J];法律科學.西北政法學院學報;2005年01期

3 翟宏麗;;論醫(yī)療糾紛訴訟中的證據(jù)協(xié)力義務[J];證據(jù)科學;2011年03期

4 高桂林;秦永志;;論醫(yī)療損害責任歸責原則——以《侵權責任法》的規(guī)定為視角[J];法學雜志;2010年09期

5 張馳;;患者隱私權定位與保護論[J];法學;2011年03期

6 王竹;;解釋論視野下的侵害患者知情同意權侵權責任[J];法學;2011年11期

7 李海軍;;關于醫(yī)療倫理過失認定標準之比較研究——以醫(yī)師告知義務為視角[J];現(xiàn)代醫(yī)院管理;2011年06期

8 劉建利;;死亡的自我決定權與社會決定權——中日安樂死問題的比較研究[J];法律科學(西北政法大學學報);2013年05期

9 楊立新;袁雪石;;論醫(yī)療機構違反告知義務的醫(yī)療侵權責任[J];河北法學;2006年12期

10 楊立新;;中國醫(yī)療損害責任制度改革[J];法學研究;2009年04期

，

本文編號：1901653