本文選題：環(huán)境侵權行為 + 環(huán)境共同侵權行為�。� 參考：《廣東外語外貿(mào)大學》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：2014年11月因北京APEC峰會而迅速走紅的詞匯“APEC藍”再次把環(huán)境污染和環(huán)境保護的議題推向另一個高潮。雖然環(huán)境共同侵權案件在整個環(huán)境侵權糾紛中所占比重不大,但卻是環(huán)境侵權糾紛中最為復雜最難處理的一類案件。就其表現(xiàn)特征而言,環(huán)境共同侵權既不同于普通共同侵權,又迥異于單一環(huán)境侵權。在環(huán)境共同侵權案件中,污染源呈現(xiàn)五花八門的復合形式,加害人為數(shù)眾多而且往往難以確定,受害人更加勢單力薄,危害后果往往十分嚴重,加害人之間的責任具有外部性和內(nèi)部性雙重屬性,案件具有廣泛的社會影響,等等。由于上述特征的存在,環(huán)境共同侵權產(chǎn)生了獨特的法律規(guī)則,在侵權法的大家庭中也因此顯得更加個性十足。而在面對嚴峻的環(huán)境共同侵權問題及其復雜的糾紛處理過程時,理論上的研究完全停留在普通共同侵權的分析框架,不能對環(huán)境共同侵權現(xiàn)象給出具有自身特色的學理解釋和邏輯分析。本文共分引言、正文和結(jié)語三個部分,其中正文由四章組成。第一部分界定了環(huán)境共同侵權的概念,通過闡釋與環(huán)境侵權行為的共性特征以及與單獨環(huán)境侵權行為相比較的個性特征,探討了其特點與類型,并緊密結(jié)合當前的國內(nèi)外的立法政策和環(huán)境法的獨特規(guī)律,舉例詳細分析了環(huán)境共同侵權本質(zhì)的構成要件,尤其是因果關系的介紹。第二部分重點分析了我國現(xiàn)行的關于環(huán)境共同侵權責任制度在責任承擔、歸責原則、責任分配和損害賠償上存在的缺陷及不足,為第四部分的完善建議摸清了病癥、掃清了障礙、奠定了理論基礎。第三部分重點介紹了環(huán)境共同侵權責任的域外考察及對我國的啟示。在該章中,本文首先分別介紹了德國、日本、瑞典與美國各州關于環(huán)境共同侵權責任的規(guī)定,以期達到“他山之石,可以攻玉”之效。然后分析了域外環(huán)境共同侵權民事責任制度對我國的啟示。第四部分具體從四個方面提出了完善我國環(huán)境污染共同侵權責任的若干思路與建議,以期為環(huán)境共同侵權民事責任的研究和立法提供思路和參考。
[Abstract]:The popular word "APEC blue", which was quickly popular in Beijing's APEC summit in November 2014, has once again pushed the issue of environmental pollution and environmental protection to another climax. Although environmental joint tort cases are not a large proportion of the whole environmental tort disputes, it is the most complex and difficult case in environmental tort disputes. The environmental joint tort is not only different from common common tort, but also different from the single environmental tort. In the case of environmental joint tort, the source of pollution presents a variety of complex forms, the number of injuring people is too large and it is often difficult to determine, the victims are more thin, the consequences of the danger are often very serious, and the responsibility of the injuring people is the same. The dual attribute of externality and internality, the case has extensive social influence, and so on. Because of the above characteristics, the environmental joint tort has produced unique legal rules, and therefore appears more individualistic in the large family of tort law. In the face of the serious environmental joint tort and the complicated dispute handling process, There are three parts in this paper, including the introduction, the text and the conclusion. The text is composed of four chapters. The first part defines the concept of environmental joint torts, through interpretation and environment. The common characteristics of tort and the characteristics of individual environmental tort are compared, and its characteristics and types are discussed, and the unique laws of the current domestic and foreign legislative policies and environmental laws are closely combined, and the essential elements of the environmental joint torts are analyzed in detail, especially the introduction of the causality. The second parts of the paper are the key points. This paper analyzes the existing defects and shortcomings of the current environmental joint tort liability system in the responsibility bearing, the principle of imputation, the distribution of responsibility and the compensation for damage. It has laid a theoretical foundation for the improvement of the fourth parts, cleared the obstacles and laid the theoretical foundation. The third part introduced the expedition of the environmental joint tort liability. In this chapter, the article first introduces the regulations of the joint tort liability of the environment in Germany, Japan, Sweden and the United States in order to achieve the effect of "the stone of other mountains and to attack jade". Then it analyzes the Enlightenment of the civil liability system of foreign environmental joint tort to our country. The fourth part is specifically proposed from four aspects. Some ideas and suggestions for improving the joint tort liability of environmental pollution in China are provided in order to provide ideas and references for the study and legislation of joint liability for environmental tort.

【學位授予單位】：廣東外語外貿(mào)大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前2條

1 梁言;;無意思聯(lián)絡共同侵權行為的立法完善[J];華章;2012年17期

2 趙秀梅;;共同侵權行為認定之研究[J];學習論壇;2012年06期

，

本文編號：1892535