本文選題：繼續(xù)性合同 + 信賴關(guān)系��； 參考：《廣東財經(jīng)大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：在當(dāng)今社會,數(shù)據(jù)爆炸、信息篩選困難,人們之間的信任關(guān)系越來越難建立,但在經(jīng)濟快速發(fā)展的環(huán)境中,人們又必須不斷追求社會活動的效率。在這樣的時代背景下,繼續(xù)性合同也就快速發(fā)展起來,人們在與交易對象建立起強烈的信賴關(guān)系后,往往不輕易放棄這種認(rèn)可。不管是企業(yè)交易,還是日常生活,人們都越來越多地訂立長期合同。除了固有的繼續(xù)性合同,如租賃合同、合伙合同、委托合同等在生活中處處可見,一些新型的繼續(xù)性合同類型,如特許經(jīng)營店合同、加盟連鎖專營店合同等蓬勃發(fā)展,使繼續(xù)性合同的種類更加豐富。但這種長期合同除了提高交易效率、穩(wěn)定交易關(guān)系外,同時也具有很強的拘束力,如果合同無法繼續(xù)維持下去,解除能對當(dāng)事人起到良好的救濟作用。繼續(xù)性合同的解除因其自身的特點而具有很多特殊性,但我國合同法的解除制度是以一時性合同為藍(lán)本制定的,未考慮到繼續(xù)性合同的特殊之處,因此相關(guān)規(guī)定對繼續(xù)性合同是否適用還有待考察。本文結(jié)合華海公司與頤高公司房屋租賃合同糾紛一案,就繼續(xù)性合同的解除制度分四個部分進行分析。第一部分:在比較分析學(xué)者主要觀點的前提下,本文嘗試著給繼續(xù)性合同進行判別、定義,概括出三個最基本特征,并且將其分為固有的繼續(xù)性合同、繼續(xù)性供給合同兩大類。同時采用總——分的結(jié)構(gòu),在第三節(jié)簡要提出繼續(xù)性合同的解除在解除原因、解除權(quán)的行使、解除的法律效果三個方面具有特殊性。第二部分:承接上部分內(nèi)容,分兩節(jié)具體闡明解除原因的特殊之處。第一節(jié)主要圍繞協(xié)議解除的地位、較一時性合同更廣的適用空間以及約定解除的時間與繼續(xù)性合同期次履行和總給付的關(guān)系問題進行分析。第二節(jié)以繼續(xù)性合同的強烈信賴關(guān)系特征為基礎(chǔ),論證其完全適用我國目前合同法關(guān)于情勢變更、不安抗辯權(quán)以及違反附隨義務(wù)的規(guī)定的不合理性。第三部分:在解除權(quán)的行使上,首先對其行使主體與解除權(quán)主體進行區(qū)分,對當(dāng)事人在選擇第三人行使解除權(quán)時提出了更高的要求;其次在行使方式上,本文確立了以通知解除為主要方式的原則,對當(dāng)事人通知解除合同也提出了比一時性合同更高的要求,并分析了訴訟解除的生效時間問題。第四部分:在解除的法律效果上,本文對繼續(xù)性合同解除的效力采清算關(guān)系說,分析恢復(fù)原狀這一救濟方式的理論觀點和適用情形,并對損害賠償中可得利益計算的可行性與確定、分配損失賠償額應(yīng)注意的問題進行詳細(xì)論述。
[Abstract]:In today's society, data explosion, information screening is difficult, the trust relationship between people is more and more difficult to establish, but in the environment of rapid economic development, people must continue to pursue the efficiency of social activities. Under the background of this era, the continuing contract develops rapidly. After establishing a strong trust relationship with the trading object, people often do not give up this kind of approval easily. People are increasingly entering into long-term contracts both in business transactions and in daily life. In addition to the inherent continuing contracts, such as lease contracts, partnership contracts, entrustment contracts and so on, some new types of continuing contracts, such as franchising contracts, franchising contracts, franchising contracts, etc., have flourished. To enrich the range of continuing contracts. But this kind of long-term contract not only improves the transaction efficiency, stabilizes the transaction relation, but also has the very strong binding force, if the contract cannot continue to maintain, the lifting can play the good relief function to the party. The dissolution of a continuing contract has many particularities because of its own characteristics. However, the dissolution system of the contract law of our country is based on the temporary contract and does not take into account the special features of the continuing contract. Therefore, the application of relevant provisions to the continuing contract is still to be investigated. Based on the case of the dispute between Huanghai Company and Yigao Company, this paper analyzes the dissolution system of the continuing contract in four parts. In the first part, on the premise of comparing and analyzing the main viewpoints of the scholars, this paper tries to distinguish and define the continuation contract, generalize the three most basic characteristics, and divide it into two categories: the inherent continuation contract and the continuing supply contract. At the same time, with the structure of total-division, in the third section, the author briefly points out that the dissolution of a continuing contract has its particularity in three aspects: the reason of the dissolution, the exercise of the right of rescission, and the legal effect of the rescission. The second part: undertake part of the content, divided into two sections to clarify the special reasons for the lifting. The first section mainly focuses on the status of the termination of the agreement, the wider space of application than the temporary contract, and the relationship between the time of the termination of the agreement and the performance of the duration of the continuing contract and the total payment. The second section is based on the characteristics of the strong trust relationship of the continuing contract, and proves that it is not reasonable to fully apply the provisions of the present contract law of our country concerning the change of circumstances, the right of restless defense and the breach of the accompanying obligation. The third part: in the exercise of the right of rescission, first of all, it distinguishes between the subject of exercise and the subject of the right of rescission, and puts forward a higher request to the parties when they choose the third party to exercise the right of rescission; secondly, it puts forward higher requirements in the way of exercising the right of rescission. In this paper, the principle of notice rescission is established, and a higher requirement is put forward for the parties to notify the dissolution of the contract than the temporary contract, and the question of the effective time of the dissolution of the lawsuit is analyzed. The fourth part: in the legal effect of rescission, this article adopts the liquidation relation to the effect of the termination of the continuing contract, and analyzes the theoretical point of view and the applicable situation of the relief mode of restitution in its original form. The feasibility and determination of the available benefits in the compensation for damages and the problems that should be paid attention to in the allocation of loss compensation are discussed in detail.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣東財經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D913

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊曉惠;于姝;;勞動合同變更的法律與實務(wù)分析[J];遼寧行政學(xué)院學(xué)報;2014年05期

2 廖安生;農(nóng)業(yè)承包合同變更、解除、轉(zhuǎn)包的法律規(guī)定[J];鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)論壇;2002年08期

3 吳新安 ,阮化;試論合同的轉(zhuǎn)讓[J];山東法學(xué);1987年04期

4 陳祥健;對合同履行原則的重新審視[J];東南學(xué)術(shù);1999年04期

5 候U，

本文編號：1862830