發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-08 19:10

  本文選題：美術(shù)作品 + 抄襲��； 參考：《華南理工大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：美術(shù)作品抄襲的認(rèn)定作為一個(gè)理論問題被提出已不可回避,然而,國內(nèi)學(xué)界以此為專門研究對象進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)研究的成果并不多見。本文旨在運(yùn)用規(guī)范分析與比較分析的方法,同時(shí)引入鑒賞美學(xué)的相關(guān)理論,嘗試重新構(gòu)建美術(shù)作品抄襲的司法認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。本文首先探討了美術(shù)作品抄襲領(lǐng)域之典型案例,提出理論上抄襲認(rèn)定的三個(gè)問題,即何為著作權(quán)保護(hù)之美術(shù)作品、美術(shù)作品的“思想”與“表達(dá)”的界定不明以及美術(shù)作品的“實(shí)質(zhì)相似”認(rèn)定不清,而前者涉及“獨(dú)創(chuàng)性”的認(rèn)定混亂問題。而這些問題源于,現(xiàn)有美術(shù)作品抄襲由被告作品是否具有“獨(dú)創(chuàng)性”來認(rèn)定,回避了抄襲認(rèn)定的基礎(chǔ)理論�；貞�(yīng)前述美術(shù)作品的抄襲認(rèn)定問題,筆者嘗試對美術(shù)作品抄襲認(rèn)定問題的相關(guān)理論重新進(jìn)行審視。在對“抄襲”一詞的界定中,筆者認(rèn)為抄襲分為抄襲與不法抄襲,著作權(quán)法定義的侵權(quán)為不法抄襲的行為;并將抄襲與剽竊、臨摹進(jìn)行對比區(qū)分,梳理著作權(quán)法上作品抄襲認(rèn)定之基礎(chǔ)理論,提出引入臺(tái)灣和美國地區(qū)對抄襲認(rèn)定所運(yùn)用的認(rèn)定方法。進(jìn)而,對美術(shù)作品與其他作品比較,發(fā)現(xiàn)其在抄襲認(rèn)定問題上的特殊性,筆者認(rèn)為融入鑒賞理論對美術(shù)作品抄襲認(rèn)定極為重要,進(jìn)而闡述鑒賞理論在美術(shù)作品抄襲認(rèn)定中的適用。筆者嘗試?yán)妹佬g(shù)作品的鑒賞要素來判斷抄襲行為,從而限定“獨(dú)創(chuàng)性”這一范疇在抄襲認(rèn)定中的作用,即“獨(dú)創(chuàng)性”在認(rèn)定美術(shù)作品抄襲的功能更多的體現(xiàn)在美術(shù)作品的認(rèn)定中,而非“實(shí)質(zhì)相似”的認(rèn)定。最后,在已有理論的基礎(chǔ)上,筆者對美術(shù)作品的抄襲認(rèn)定的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)進(jìn)行重構(gòu)。厘清思想表達(dá)二分法中“表達(dá)”的內(nèi)涵、“實(shí)質(zhì)相似”認(rèn)定以及例外排除等核心要素的層次。進(jìn)而得出全新的美術(shù)作品抄襲認(rèn)定審查架構(gòu):作品滿足美術(shù)作品之構(gòu)成要件→達(dá)到鑒賞要素要求構(gòu)成表達(dá)抄襲→接觸與實(shí)質(zhì)相似的認(rèn)定→例外排除。
[Abstract]:The identification of plagiarism of art works as a theoretical issue has been put forward, however, the domestic academic circles as a special research object of systematic research results are rare. The purpose of this paper is to use the methods of normative analysis and comparative analysis, and at the same time to introduce the relevant theory of appreciation aesthetics, and try to reconstruct the judicial standard of plagiarism of art works. This paper first discusses the typical cases in the field of plagiarism of art works, and puts forward three problems of theoretical plagiarism, that is, what is the copyright protection of art works? The definition of "thought" and "expression" of art works is unclear and the "substantial similarity" of art works is not clear, while the former involves the confusion of "originality". These problems come from whether the defendant's works are original or not, and avoid the basic theory of plagiarism. In response to the problem of plagiarism, the author tries to re-examine the theory of plagiarism. In the definition of "plagiarism", the author thinks that plagiarism is divided into plagiarism and illegal plagiarism, the infringement defined by copyright law is illegal plagiarism, and plagiarism are compared and distinguished. This paper combs the basic theory of plagiarism in copyright law and puts forward the identification methods of plagiarism in Taiwan and America. Furthermore, comparing with other works, the author finds out the particularity of the problem of plagiarism. The author thinks that it is very important to integrate the theory of appreciation to identify the plagiarism of art works. Then expound the application of appreciation theory in the identification of plagiarism of art works. The author tries to use the appreciation elements of art works to judge the act of plagiarism, so as to limit the role of the category of "originality" in the identification of plagiarism. That is, "originality" is more embodied in the identification of art works than in the identification of "substantial similarity" in identifying the function of plagiarism in art works. Finally, on the basis of existing theories, the author reconstructs the standard of plagiarism of art works. It clarifies the connotation of "expression" in the dichotomy of thought expression, the level of core elements such as "substantial similarity" and exception exclusion. Finally, the author draws a new examination framework of plagiarism in art works: the works meet the requirements of the elements of appreciation of works of fine arts, and the identification that expression plagiarism contact is similar to the essence is excluded.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華南理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D923.41

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 崔勃;阮瑩;;油畫《重慶大轟炸》被扯上法庭[J];民主與法制;2004年24期

2 李宗輝;;西方文學(xué)藝術(shù)史上作者的著作權(quán)意識(shí)自覺[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2014年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：1862673