本文選題：視頻分享網(wǎng)站 + 避風港規(guī)則��； 參考：《廣東財經(jīng)大學》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：始于2003年的Web2.0技術(shù)讓互聯(lián)網(wǎng)用戶由讀者變成了作者,由單純的網(wǎng)上沖浪變成了波浪的制造者。視頻分享網(wǎng)站就是在這樣的背景下產(chǎn)生的,它開創(chuàng)了互聯(lián)網(wǎng)領(lǐng)域全新的傳播模式,這種以網(wǎng)絡(luò)用戶為中心并將其創(chuàng)作的作品進行存儲和分享的平臺,一經(jīng)推出便吸引了巨大的人氣。如今視頻分享網(wǎng)站已經(jīng)成為互聯(lián)網(wǎng)經(jīng)濟的重要組成部分,正積極為經(jīng)濟發(fā)展和社會進步做貢獻。但我們不得不承認,網(wǎng)絡(luò)并非有利無弊,視頻分享網(wǎng)站也是利弊共存。在視頻分享網(wǎng)站日益增多的今天,各類網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)紛爭屢見不鮮。視頻分享網(wǎng)站陷入了前所未有的困境,不僅要應對數(shù)量眾多的侵權(quán)糾紛還要面對金額巨大的賠償,視頻分享網(wǎng)站如何走向可持續(xù)發(fā)展道路這一問題急需解決。同我國一樣,美國視頻分享網(wǎng)站的發(fā)展也有著相似的經(jīng)歷。為了使著作人的合法權(quán)益不受侵犯,同時保持視頻分享行業(yè)的穩(wěn)定發(fā)展并為網(wǎng)絡(luò)用戶提供健康的創(chuàng)造、分享以及社交網(wǎng)絡(luò)環(huán)境,在社會各界的共同努力下,美國政府推出了“避風港”規(guī)則,這一制度的出現(xiàn),使得著作權(quán)人、視頻分享網(wǎng)站、網(wǎng)絡(luò)用戶的權(quán)益達到了平衡。正是在美國的啟發(fā)下,我國結(jié)合自身實際情況也制定了“避風港”規(guī)則,從司法角度來看,“避風港”規(guī)則具有重大的實踐價值。本文以視頻分享網(wǎng)站及其發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀為視角,比較分析了合理適用“避風港”規(guī)則來平衡互聯(lián)網(wǎng)技術(shù)發(fā)展與著作權(quán)法律保護兩者之間的關(guān)系,促成真正的利益最大化。在此基礎(chǔ)上,結(jié)合我國的司法實踐深入剖析了作為舶來品的“避風港”規(guī)則的若干不完善之處并嘗試性的提出了合理性建議。除引言和結(jié)語外,本文包括四個部分。第一部分的主要內(nèi)容是概念闡述,可以從該部分了解到視頻分享網(wǎng)站的定義,同時從法律的角度對視頻分享網(wǎng)站所陷入的瓶頸的現(xiàn)狀進行了分析,從而揭示出“避風港”規(guī)則的價值。第二部分總結(jié)了各國“避風港”規(guī)則在法律中的實際體現(xiàn),經(jīng)過對比分析揭露了我國相關(guān)法律存在的缺陷。第三部分從實踐角度出發(fā),通過分析指出我國“避風港”規(guī)則在實踐中碰到的問題,比如司法人員未能清楚了解“避風港”規(guī)則的若干法律條款,并輔之以案例的方式闡述了視頻分享網(wǎng)站在主觀要件和客觀要件上的司法認定標準。第四部分針對上述問題提出解決對策,以期能在司法實踐中更準確的理解和運用“避風港”規(guī)則,力求形成視頻分享產(chǎn)業(yè)健康發(fā)展、著作權(quán)人的權(quán)利得到法律保護以及保證網(wǎng)絡(luò)用戶能動性三贏的局面。
[Abstract]:Web2.0, which began in 2003, has turned Internet users from readers to writers, from simple surfing to wave makers. Video sharing sites are created in this context. They create a new mode of communication in the field of the Internet, which is a platform for storing and sharing the works created by the users of the Internet. Once launched, it attracted huge popularity. Today, video sharing sites have become an important part of the Internet economy, and are actively contributing to economic development and social progress. But we have to admit that the network is not conducive to no harm, video sharing site is also a combination of pros and cons. Nowadays, with the increasing number of video sharing websites, all kinds of network copyright disputes are common. Video sharing website has fallen into an unprecedented dilemma, not only to deal with a large number of infringement disputes, but also to face huge compensation, video sharing website how to move towards sustainable development of the problem needs to be resolved. With our country, the development of American video sharing website also has similar experience. In order to keep the legitimate rights and interests of the authors from being infringed, to maintain the steady development of the video sharing industry and to provide a healthy environment for the creation, sharing and social networking of Internet users, with the joint efforts of all sectors of society, The United States government has introduced the "safe haven" rule, the emergence of this system, copyright owners, video sharing sites, network users' rights and interests have reached a balance. It is under the inspiration of the United States that our country has also formulated the "safe haven" rule according to its actual situation. From the judicial point of view, the "safe haven" rule has great practical value. From the angle of view of video sharing website and its development status, this paper compares and analyzes the reasonable application of "safe haven" rules to balance the relationship between the development of Internet technology and the legal protection of copyright, so as to maximize the real benefits. On this basis, combined with the judicial practice of our country, this paper deeply analyzes some imperfections in the rules of "safe haven" which are imported goods and puts forward some reasonable suggestions. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this paper includes four parts. The first part of the main content is concept elaboration, can understand the definition of video sharing website from this part, at the same time, from the angle of law, it analyzes the current situation of the bottleneck of video sharing website. Thus reveals the value of the "safe haven" rules. The second part summarizes the practical embodiment of the "safe haven" rules in various countries, and reveals the defects of the relevant laws of our country through comparative analysis. The third part, from the perspective of practice, points out the problems encountered in the practice of the "safe haven" rules in China, such as the lack of a clear understanding of some legal provisions of the "safe haven" rules. With the help of a case, this paper expounds the standards of judicial recognition of video sharing websites in subjective and objective elements. The fourth part puts forward the solutions to the above problems, in order to understand and apply the "safe haven" rules more accurately in the judicial practice, and strive to form a healthy development of video sharing industry. The rights of copyright owners are protected by law and the situation of network users' initiative is guaranteed.
【學位授予單位】：廣東財經(jīng)大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D913

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 芮松艷;;論視頻分享網(wǎng)站主觀過錯的認定[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2012年01期

2 王遷;;論版權(quán)“間接侵權(quán)”及其規(guī)則的法定化[J];法學;2005年12期

3 王遷;;《信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)保護條例》中“避風港”規(guī)則的效力[J];法學;2010年06期

4 吳丹晴;;由中外案例分析ISP版權(quán)侵權(quán)之訴中避風港規(guī)則的適用[J];商品與質(zhì)量;2011年S4期

5 劉曉海;;《侵權(quán)責任法》“互聯(lián)網(wǎng)專條”對網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者侵犯著作權(quán)責任的影響[J];知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2011年09期

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前1條

1 陳玲;我國視頻分享網(wǎng)站的“避風港”規(guī)則研究[D];西南政法大學;2012年

，

本文編號：1844540