本文選題：誘空虛假陳述 + 事實(shí)因果關(guān)系�。� 參考：《法商研究》2016年06期

【摘要】：我國(guó)有關(guān)證券虛假陳述民事責(zé)任法律規(guī)范只規(guī)定了誘多虛假陳述因果關(guān)系的認(rèn)定規(guī)則,對(duì)誘空虛假陳述的因果關(guān)系卻未提及。鑒于"必然因果關(guān)系說(shuō)"和"相當(dāng)因果關(guān)系說(shuō)"存在的缺陷,用我國(guó)現(xiàn)行因果關(guān)系理論解決誘空虛假陳述因果關(guān)系的認(rèn)定問(wèn)題是行不通的。誘空虛假陳述之因果關(guān)系可以分為事實(shí)因果關(guān)系和法律因果關(guān)系。事實(shí)因果關(guān)系的認(rèn)定可分兩種情況:隱瞞型誘空虛假陳述可以采用重大性標(biāo)準(zhǔn)予以認(rèn)定,其他型誘空虛假陳述則以欺詐市場(chǎng)理論為基礎(chǔ)的信賴推定原則予以認(rèn)定;法律因果關(guān)系則適用"直接后果說(shuō)"和"合理預(yù)見(jiàn)說(shuō)"進(jìn)行認(rèn)定。
[Abstract]:In our country, the legal norms of civil liability for false statements of securities only stipulate the rules for determining the causality of false statements, but the causality of the false statements is not mentioned. In view of the defects of the "inevitable causality" and the "equivalent causality theory", the causation of the false statements of the lure is solved by the current theory of causality in our country. The relationship between the causality of the false statement can be divided into factual causality and legal causality. The identification of factual causality can be divided into two cases: the concealment type false statement can be identified by the standard of importance, and the other type of vacant false statement is based on fraudulent market theory. According to presumption principle, the law of causality is applicable to "direct consequence theory" and "reasonable foresight theory".

【作者單位】： 中南財(cái)經(jīng)政法大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：國(guó)家社會(huì)科學(xué)基金后期資助項(xiàng)目(13FFX008)
【分類號(hào)】：D922.287;D923

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 肖揚(yáng)宇;;定罪因果關(guān)系及認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的建構(gòu)——從兩個(gè)案例切入[J];華北水利水電學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社科版);2012年01期

2 權(quán)新廣;;試談刑法中的因果關(guān)系[J];法學(xué)研究;1963年03期

3 夏起經(jīng);;刑法中的因果關(guān)系[J];法學(xué)研究;1981年02期

4 梅o，

本文編號(hào)：1845086