本文選題：分?jǐn)傇瓌t + 全部市場價值��； 參考：《現(xiàn)代法學(xué)》2017年05期

【摘要】：分?jǐn)傇瓌t是在多部件、多專利的復(fù)雜產(chǎn)品背景下計算專利侵權(quán)損害賠償數(shù)額的重要方法。選擇合適的損害賠償計算基礎(chǔ)是適用分?jǐn)傇瓌t的起點。將最小可銷售專利實施單元作為損害賠償計算基礎(chǔ)的缺省規(guī)則會帶來賠償不足的較高風(fēng)險,并可能造成專利許可實踐中交易成本的提高。選擇專利產(chǎn)品的全部市場價值作為計算基礎(chǔ)時,其錯誤風(fēng)險則是中性的。用于計算分?jǐn)偙壤母鞣N經(jīng)濟(jì)方法均有其優(yōu)缺點,必須根據(jù)個案選擇適宜的具體計算方法。經(jīng)驗方法和數(shù)量比例法并非確定分?jǐn)偙壤倪m當(dāng)方法,應(yīng)予以摒棄。
[Abstract]:The principle of allocation is an important method to calculate the amount of damages for patent infringement under the complex product background of multi-parts and multi-patents. Choosing an appropriate basis for calculating damages is the starting point for applying the allocation principle. The default rules which take the minimum marketable patent implementation unit as the basis for the calculation of damages may bring about a higher risk of inadequate compensation and may lead to higher transaction costs in the practice of patent licensing. When the total market value of the patented product is chosen as the basis of calculation, the error risk is neutral. There are advantages and disadvantages of various economic methods used to calculate the share ratio, so we must choose the appropriate calculation method according to the individual case. The empirical method and the quantitative method are not appropriate methods for determining the scale of assessment and should be abandoned.
【作者單位】： 最高人民法院知識產(chǎn)權(quán)庭;
【分類號】：D923.42
，

本文編號：1782119