本文選題：第三人 + 侵害債權�。� 參考：《江西財經大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：民法一般觀點認為,侵權針對的主要是指物權、知識產權等權利,債權一般不會認定是侵權行為所包含的內容,然而,隨著市場的繁榮和國家的進步,第三人侵害債權的行為大量出現,其它的發(fā)達國家和地區(qū)從學術界到司法界,各個方面都逐漸加強對第三人侵害債權的分析和思考,對民眾進行債權保護,該制度具有較大的積極作用,同時,該制度對債之相對性觀點形成了較大影響,因此對是該制度應否確立,各方觀點不一、對立較大,筆者以第三人侵害債權作為論點,著手從四方面展開論述。第一篇,首先從國內外各種觀點中比較得出第三人侵害債權的含義,解決什么是第三人侵害債權的問題,接著從兩個層次分析為什么要建立第三人侵害債權制度。第二篇,對第三人侵害債權制度進行探討,分析介紹第三人侵害債權制度在大陸法系國家地區(qū)及英美法系國家的情況,通過比較得出觀點,找到共同點。第三篇,以前面的分析為前提,展開分析第三人侵害債權,先對第三人侵害債權制度的組成進行論述,主要討論“六要素”說,再對第三人侵害債權的案件進行分類說明,以明確第三人侵害債權行為彼此之間的差異,主要討論第三人侵害債權的方式,區(qū)分第三人直接侵害債權及第三人間接侵害債權,對于不同的侵權方法,提出不同的責任主張,接著分析第三人如果有侵害債權的舉動,那些情形可以讓其不承擔責任,找出免責情形,總結免責事由。第四篇,最后回歸我國立法現狀及司法現狀,鑒于我國已通過的《侵權責任法》對第三人侵害債權還是一片空白,說明我國第三人侵害債權所處的現狀,探討我國第三人侵害債權糾紛案件的司法審判,從立法、司法兩方面作總結,提出適合中國特色的立法建議。
[Abstract]:The general view of civil law is that the infringement mainly refers to the rights of real right, intellectual property and other rights, and the creditor's rights are not generally recognized as the contents of the infringement. However, with the prosperity of the market and the progress of the country,The third party infringes on the creditor's rights in a large number. In other developed countries and regions, from the academic circles to the judicial circles, all aspects have gradually strengthened the analysis and thinking of the third party's infringement of the creditor's rights, so as to protect the people's claims.At the same time, the system has a great influence on the relative view of debt. Therefore, the author takes the third party's infringement of creditor's rights as an argument that whether the system should be established or not.Start the discussion from four aspects.The first part first compares the meaning of the third party's infringement of creditor's rights from various points of view at home and abroad, solves the problem of what is the third party's infringement of the creditor's rights, and then analyzes why the third party infringes the creditor's rights system from two levels.The second part discusses the system of infringement of creditor's rights by the third party, analyzes and introduces the situation of the infringement of the creditor's rights by the third party in the countries of the continental law system and the countries of the Anglo-American legal system, and finds the common ground by comparing the views of the third party against the creditor's rights.The third part, on the premise of the previous analysis, analyzes the third party's infringement of creditor's rights, first discusses the composition of the third party's infringement of creditor's rights system, mainly discusses the theory of "six elements", and then explains the case of the third party's infringement of creditor's rights by classification.In order to clarify the difference between the behavior of the third party against the creditor's rights, mainly discuss the way of the third party encroaching on the creditor's rights, distinguish the third party's direct infringement of the creditor's rights from the third party's indirect infringement of the creditor's rights, and put forward different liability claims for different tort methods.Then, if the third party has the behavior of infringing on the creditor's rights, those circumstances can make them take no responsibility, find out the disclaimer and sum up the reason of the exemption.The fourth part, finally returns to our country legislation present situation and the judicatory present situation, in view of our country already passed "Tort liability Law" to the third party infringement creditor's rights is still a blank, explains our country the third party encroaches on the creditor's rights the present situation.This paper probes into the judicial trial of the disputes of infringement of creditor's rights by the third party in our country, summarizes it from the aspects of legislation and judicature, and puts forward some legislative suggestions suitable for Chinese characteristics.
【學位授予單位】：江西財經大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D923

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前3條

1 楊立新;;制定侵權責任法應當著重解決的幾個問題——對2002年12月23日《侵權責任法草案》的研究報告[J];法學雜志;2007年03期

2 魏盛禮;第三人侵害債權理論:理論創(chuàng)新還是法學歧途?[J];河北法學;2005年09期

3 朱曉哲;債之相對性的突破——以第三人侵害債權為中心[J];華東政法學院學報;1999年05期

相關碩士學位論文 前1條

1 韓寧;第三人侵害債權研究[D];鄭州大學;2006年

，

本文編號：1749624