本文選題：指標(biāo) + 購(gòu)房指標(biāo)�。� 參考：《西南政法大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：購(gòu)房指標(biāo)是一種民事權(quán)利,即指標(biāo)權(quán)利人對(duì)未來(lái)獲得指標(biāo)房屋所有權(quán)的一種期待,因其具有獨(dú)特的經(jīng)濟(jì)價(jià)值而成為民法上的期待權(quán)。期待權(quán)可轉(zhuǎn)讓的本質(zhì)屬性使得指標(biāo)權(quán)利人可以通過(guò)轉(zhuǎn)讓指標(biāo)來(lái)獲得預(yù)期的經(jīng)濟(jì)利益,因而產(chǎn)生了購(gòu)房指標(biāo)轉(zhuǎn)讓協(xié)議。實(shí)務(wù)上對(duì)購(gòu)房指標(biāo)轉(zhuǎn)讓協(xié)議的效力研究多種多樣,有效說(shuō)和無(wú)效說(shuō)的支持者眾說(shuō)紛紜。所以本文從理論和實(shí)踐兩方面,針對(duì)此購(gòu)房指標(biāo)轉(zhuǎn)讓協(xié)議之效力提出自己之見(jiàn)解。第一部分主要內(nèi)容是對(duì)購(gòu)房指標(biāo)性質(zhì)之界定。首先通過(guò)社會(huì)學(xué)之界定得出,購(gòu)房指標(biāo)就是房產(chǎn)管理部門(mén)或者集資單位事先確定好的一種指數(shù)或者標(biāo)準(zhǔn);其次,從法學(xué)層面分析認(rèn)為購(gòu)房指標(biāo)符合主體之意志、行為之利益以及法律之保護(hù)與認(rèn)可這三種權(quán)利之構(gòu)成要件;再次,購(gòu)房指標(biāo)屬于一種資格,指標(biāo)權(quán)利人有資格享有對(duì)指標(biāo)房所有權(quán)的期待;最后從期待權(quán)與物權(quán)、期待權(quán)與債權(quán)之關(guān)系來(lái)證明購(gòu)房指標(biāo)之本質(zhì)-債權(quán)性期待權(quán)。第二部分主要內(nèi)容是對(duì)購(gòu)房指標(biāo)轉(zhuǎn)讓協(xié)議性質(zhì)之界定。首先,從合同成立之角度分析,購(gòu)房指標(biāo)轉(zhuǎn)讓協(xié)議符合合同之成立要件,并且由于該協(xié)議的標(biāo)的-購(gòu)房指標(biāo)作為一種債權(quán)性期待權(quán)能被轉(zhuǎn)讓,得出其是一種狹義合同即債權(quán)合同;其次,基于預(yù)售商品房之再轉(zhuǎn)讓行為屬于房屋買(mǎi)賣合同之事實(shí),推出購(gòu)房指標(biāo)轉(zhuǎn)讓協(xié)議也屬于房屋買(mǎi)賣合同之范疇;接著,通過(guò)分析三種理論界有關(guān)購(gòu)房指標(biāo)轉(zhuǎn)讓協(xié)議效力的觀點(diǎn),并且借鑒法國(guó)合同法和日本債法之相關(guān)內(nèi)得以容推出,該協(xié)議僅是一種指標(biāo)權(quán)利人與受讓人簽訂的轉(zhuǎn)讓購(gòu)房指標(biāo)權(quán)利的雙務(wù)合同。第三部分主要內(nèi)容是對(duì)購(gòu)房指標(biāo)轉(zhuǎn)讓協(xié)議效力之界定。本文首先將該指標(biāo)轉(zhuǎn)讓協(xié)議分為商品房購(gòu)房指標(biāo)轉(zhuǎn)讓協(xié)議和集資房購(gòu)房指標(biāo)轉(zhuǎn)讓協(xié)議這兩類。在分析這兩種指標(biāo)轉(zhuǎn)讓協(xié)議時(shí),首先從法理學(xué)、合同法、和物權(quán)法這幾方面分析,得出指標(biāo)轉(zhuǎn)讓協(xié)議有效性具有理論上的依據(jù),接著從實(shí)踐方面闡述這兩種購(gòu)房指標(biāo)轉(zhuǎn)讓協(xié)議產(chǎn)生之原因以及探討相關(guān)案例之處理方式,以期為這兩種轉(zhuǎn)讓協(xié)議之效力提供實(shí)踐支撐。第四部分主要內(nèi)容是構(gòu)建購(gòu)房指標(biāo)轉(zhuǎn)讓協(xié)議之風(fēng)險(xiǎn)防范機(jī)制。首先從堅(jiān)持一定的指導(dǎo)原則即平等正義原則、鼓勵(lì)交易和誠(chéng)實(shí)信用這三種原則著手;其次,從宏觀和微觀這兩個(gè)層面來(lái)探討針對(duì)購(gòu)房指標(biāo)轉(zhuǎn)讓合同的立法保障;最后,從加強(qiáng)司法引導(dǎo)職能和提高買(mǎi)賣雙方風(fēng)險(xiǎn)意識(shí)之角度來(lái)完成對(duì)該種協(xié)議風(fēng)險(xiǎn)防范機(jī)制之建構(gòu)。
[Abstract]:The index of buying a house is a kind of civil right, that is, the owner of index right expects to obtain the ownership of the target house in the future, because of its unique economic value, it becomes the expectation right in civil law.The essential attribute of the transferability of the expected right makes the target holder obtain the expected economic benefits through the transfer of the index, and thus produces the agreement on the transfer of the target of the purchase of a house.In practice, there are many kinds of researches on the validity of the target transfer agreement, and there are different opinions among the supporters of the effective theory and the invalid theory.Therefore, this paper from the theoretical and practical aspects, the effectiveness of this target transfer agreement to put forward their own views.The first part of the main content is the definition of the nature of the purchase index.First of all, through the definition of sociology, it is concluded that the housing purchase index is a kind of index or standard determined in advance by the real estate management department or the financing unit; secondly, the author thinks that the purchase index accords with the will of the main body from the legal level.The interests of the act and the protection and recognition of the law constitute the elements of these three rights; thirdly, the index of buying a house belongs to a kind of qualification, and the owner of the index has the right to enjoy the expectation of the ownership of the target house; finally, from the perspective of the right of expectation and the right of real right,The relationship between expectation right and creditor's right to prove the essence of house purchase index-creditor's right of expectation.The second part is the definition of the property of the target transfer agreement.First of all, from the point of view of contract formation, the agreement of index transfer of house purchase accords with the requirements of contract, and because the target of the agreement, the index of purchase of house, is transferred as a kind of creditor's rights and expectation.It is a narrow contract that is creditor's rights contract. Secondly, based on the fact that the retransfer behavior of pre-sale commercial housing belongs to the housing sale contract, the introduction of the sale index transfer agreement also belongs to the scope of the housing purchase contract.By analyzing the views of three theoretical circles on the validity of the agreement on the transfer of house purchase indicators, and drawing lessons from the relevant internal aspects of French contract law and Japanese debt law,The agreement is only a double contract between the owner and the transferee to transfer the right to purchase a house.The third part is the definition of the validity of the transfer agreement.In this paper, the index transfer agreement is divided into two types: commercial house purchase index transfer agreement and financing house purchase index transfer agreement.In the analysis of these two index transfer agreements, firstly, from the aspects of jurisprudence, contract law and property law, it is concluded that the validity of the index transfer agreement has a theoretical basis.Then from the aspect of practice, this paper expounds the causes of these two kinds of target transfer agreements and discusses the ways of dealing with relevant cases, in order to provide practical support for the effectiveness of these two kinds of transfer agreements.The fourth part is to construct the risk prevention mechanism of the target transfer agreement.First of all, from the adherence to certain guiding principles, that is, the principle of equality and justice, encouraging transactions and good faith, the three principles; secondly, from the macro and micro levels to explore the legal protection of the transfer contract for the target purchase; finally,From the angle of strengthening the function of judicial guidance and raising the risk consciousness of the buyers and sellers, the construction of the risk prevention mechanism of the agreement is completed.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D923.6

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉琳;;論期待權(quán)[J];湖湘論壇;2006年05期

2 阮麗娟;阮萍萍;;論期待權(quán)[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究導(dǎo)刊;2009年25期

3 張雅萍;;期待權(quán)概念及其學(xué)說(shuō)之考察[J];商業(yè)研究;2011年05期

4 申衛(wèi)星;;期待權(quán)研究導(dǎo)論[J];清華法學(xué);2002年00期

5 吳培玉;;期待權(quán)社會(huì)價(jià)值分析[J];山西警官高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2007年03期

6 張雅萍;;期待權(quán)性質(zhì)之法理學(xué)分析[J];學(xué)術(shù)交流;2009年08期

7 王紅梅;;試論保留買(mǎi)主期待權(quán)的效力及其保護(hù)問(wèn)題[J];傳承;2010年33期

8 張雅萍;;期待權(quán)效力之法理學(xué)探究[J];學(xué)術(shù)交流;2011年04期

9 張雅萍;;期待權(quán)之本質(zhì)特征芻議[J];哈爾濱商業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年02期

10 何鳳偉;;論期待權(quán)[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2013年01期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 饒曉曜;;簡(jiǎn)析繼承權(quán)是否能成為期待權(quán)[A];當(dāng)代法學(xué)論壇（二○一○年第1輯）[C];2010年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前4條

1 哈爾濱商業(yè)大學(xué)法學(xué)院 張雅萍;期房公示狀態(tài)下的期待權(quán)芻議[N];光明日?qǐng)?bào);2007年

2 崔民;患者期待權(quán)損害賠償之我見(jiàn)[N];江蘇法制報(bào);2009年

3 曹大德邋張北京;對(duì)被執(zhí)行人分期付款商品房的執(zhí)行[N];人民法院報(bào);2007年

4 張玉勝;“一把手”分權(quán)筑牢反腐制度籠子[N];青島日?qǐng)?bào);2014年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 申衛(wèi)星;期待權(quán)理論研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2001年

2 張雅萍;期待權(quán)導(dǎo)論[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2011年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 劉金華;期待權(quán)研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2010年

2 王睿;論期待權(quán)[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2004年

3 賀芬;期待權(quán)若干問(wèn)題研究[D];華僑大學(xué);2006年

4 王驊;我國(guó)期待權(quán)制度研究[D];貴州大學(xué);2008年

5 曾軍;商品住房期待權(quán)研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2008年

6 賈楠;期待權(quán)理論探究[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2009年

7 郝燕;期待權(quán)研究[D];武漢理工大學(xué);2010年

8 徐敏霞;期待權(quán)論[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2004年

9 范曉萬(wàn);期待權(quán)研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2006年

10 高坡;論所有權(quán)保留買(mǎi)賣中買(mǎi)受人的期待權(quán)[D];西南政法大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：1748439