發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-04-14 08:01

  本文選題：專利 + 標(biāo)準(zhǔn)制定組織��； 參考：《北方法學(xué)》2017年05期

【摘要】：標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的制定越來(lái)越無(wú)法繞開專利,標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的公共性與專利的私有性之間存在沖突。專利權(quán)人為了實(shí)現(xiàn)自身利益的最大化,在標(biāo)準(zhǔn)制定過(guò)程中往往會(huì)采取欺詐的方式故意不披露其專利,通過(guò)"暗度陳倉(cāng)"的方式促使其專利被納入標(biāo)準(zhǔn)之中。借助于標(biāo)準(zhǔn)給其專利所帶來(lái)的壟斷力,專利權(quán)人就能向標(biāo)準(zhǔn)實(shí)施者提出種種不合理的許可要求。標(biāo)準(zhǔn)制定組織的披露規(guī)則對(duì)于預(yù)防這一問題具有重要的價(jià)值。披露規(guī)則不是標(biāo)準(zhǔn)制定組織與專利權(quán)人之間的一種合同,而是類似于行業(yè)協(xié)會(huì)的自律性規(guī)定。標(biāo)準(zhǔn)制定組織可以借助于披露規(guī)則對(duì)專利權(quán)人提出超出合同法范圍的披露義務(wù)要求。但是,披露規(guī)則所存在的非強(qiáng)制性、過(guò)度依賴專利權(quán)人的主動(dòng)披露、不當(dāng)?shù)匾?guī)定了專利檢索豁免、不要求標(biāo)準(zhǔn)制定組織對(duì)所披露的信息進(jìn)行實(shí)質(zhì)性審查、對(duì)不披露行為應(yīng)承擔(dān)的不利后果規(guī)定不足等方面的問題,大大限制了披露規(guī)則的效果。
[Abstract]:The formulation of standards is more and more unable to bypass patents, and there is a conflict between the publicity of standards and the private nature of patents.In order to realize the maximization of their own interests, the patentee will deliberately not disclose his patent in the process of making the standard, and promote the patent to be included in the standard by the way of "making a secret statement".With the help of the monopoly power brought by the standard to its patent, the patentee can put forward various unreasonable licensing requirements to the standard implementers.The disclosure rules of standard-setting organizations have important value in preventing this problem.Disclosure rules are not a contract between a standard-setting organization and a patentee, but a self-regulatory rule similar to that of an industry association.The standard-setting organization may request the patentee beyond the scope of contract law by means of the disclosure rules.However, the existence of non-mandatory disclosure rules, excessive reliance on patentee's initiative disclosure, improper provision of patent retrieval exemptions, and no substantive review of the disclosed information by standard-setting organizations,The effect of disclosure rules is greatly limited by inadequate provisions on the adverse consequences of non-disclosure.
【作者單位】： 中國(guó)青年政治學(xué)院;
【基金】：國(guó)家社科基金青年項(xiàng)目“標(biāo)準(zhǔn)必要專利反壟斷規(guī)制研究”(16CFX050)的階段性成果
【分類號(hào)】：D923.42

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 DanidJ.Gifford;郜超;趙啟杉;;專利法、版權(quán)法和反壟斷法之下的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)制定問題相關(guān)對(duì)策的發(fā)展模型[J];網(wǎng)絡(luò)法律評(píng)論;2003年00期

，

本文編號(hào)：1748384