本文選題：商品化權(quán)　切入點(diǎn)：虛擬角色　出處：《吉林大學(xué)》2008年碩士論文

【摘要】： 隨著商品經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展,商品化現(xiàn)象在我國(guó)初見(jiàn)端倪,并引起了侵權(quán)糾紛,如著名的魯迅肖像案、“三毛”漫畫(huà)形象糾紛案、“奧特曼”糾紛案、五朵金花案等就具有典型的代表意義。由于缺乏法律的明確規(guī)定和理論的支撐,司法實(shí)踐對(duì)于已在我國(guó)出現(xiàn)的虛擬角色商品化權(quán)糾紛案件的審判或有失公平,或有失統(tǒng)一,對(duì)商品化權(quán)問(wèn)題的研究逐漸受到我國(guó)學(xué)術(shù)界的關(guān)注。由于這是一項(xiàng)新型權(quán)利,國(guó)外研究尚未定型,國(guó)內(nèi)研究也剛剛起步,對(duì)很多問(wèn)題的探討還不成熟,在很多方面并未達(dá)成共識(shí)。 本文通過(guò)對(duì)美國(guó)虛擬角色商品化權(quán)法律保護(hù)的現(xiàn)實(shí)考量得到啟示,認(rèn)為我國(guó)應(yīng)借鑒美國(guó)實(shí)踐中所采取的綜合保護(hù)模式,參考美國(guó)判例法中所形成的保護(hù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn),嘗試推出與研究典型案例,等待時(shí)機(jī)成熟后以司法解釋的方式確立保護(hù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn),從而完善對(duì)虛擬角色商品化權(quán)的法律保護(hù)。
[Abstract]:With the development of commodity economy, the phenomenon of commercialization appeared in our country and caused infringement disputes, such as the famous portrait of Lu Xun case, "Sanmao" comic image dispute case, "Altman" dispute case,Five golden flower case and so on has the typical representative significance.Due to the lack of clear legal provisions and theoretical support, judicial practice is unfair or inconsistent in the trials of disputes over the commercialization of virtual roles that have emerged in our country.The research on the issue of commercialization right has been paid more and more attention by the academic circles of our country.Because this is a new right, foreign research has not been finalized, domestic research has just started, the discussion of many issues is not mature, there is no consensus in many aspects.Based on the practical considerations of the legal protection of the virtual role commercialization right in the United States, this paper holds that our country should draw lessons from the comprehensive protection model adopted in American practice, and refer to the protection standards formed in the case law of the United States.This paper tries to introduce and study typical cases, and to establish the standard of protection by judicial interpretation after waiting for the time to mature, so as to perfect the legal protection of the commercialization right of virtual characters.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2008
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D923.49

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 胡偉東;李昕岳;;動(dòng)漫角色商品化權(quán)保護(hù)[J];安徽警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年03期

2 劉國(guó)慶;唐薩娌;;對(duì)商品化權(quán)保護(hù)問(wèn)題研究[J];社會(huì)科學(xué)戰(zhàn)線(xiàn);2011年06期

3 陳燦平;;“鍋得缸”商標(biāo)諧音“郭德綱”之法律分析[J];法學(xué)雜志;2011年08期

4 李靜;;影視作品中虛構(gòu)人物形象之商品化權(quán)[J];法制與社會(huì);2011年24期

5 張費(fèi)微;;論動(dòng)漫角色商品化知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)的現(xiàn)狀與對(duì)策[J];赤峰學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(漢文哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年08期

6 徐升權(quán);;動(dòng)漫形象的商標(biāo)法保護(hù)路徑評(píng)析[J];中華商標(biāo);2011年07期

7 張建梅;蘇U，

本文編號(hào)：1723040