發(fā)布時間：2018-04-03 17:21

  本文選題：第三人侵權(quán)　切入點：安全保障義務　出處：《蘭州大學》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：在第三人襲擊校園傷害學生的侵害事故中,受害學生和家長在獲得法律救濟過程中主要的法律依據(jù)就是《侵權(quán)責任法》第40條。然而本文通過對《侵權(quán)責任法》第40條進行基礎(chǔ)理論分析過程中發(fā)現(xiàn),其價值定位有悖于《侵權(quán)責任法》的“權(quán)利救濟法”核心價值定位之立場,對受害學生的救濟力度不夠,在應然的角度上有失公平公正。有鑒于此,本文以“歸責原則”和“受害人的法益保護及救濟”為出發(fā)點對《侵權(quán)責任法》第40條進行橫向和縱向的比較分析：橫向上,通過第40條與第37條和38條的比較分析可知第40條的存在使得整部《侵權(quán)責任法》的體系呈現(xiàn)出不一或日紊亂；縱向上,通過對第40條的價值定位的分析可知其有悖于《侵權(quán)責任法》的“權(quán)利救濟法”的核心價值定位。最后本文從解釋論和立法論的角度對《侵權(quán)責任法》第40條進行了有益于受害學生的論述和建議,以期能夠平衡處于弱勢群體地位的受害學生之法律利益。
[Abstract]:In the case of the third person attacking the campus to injure the students, the main legal basis for the injured students and their parents in the process of obtaining legal relief is Article 40 of the Tort liability Law.However, through the basic theoretical analysis of Article 40 of the Tort liability Law, it is found that its value orientation is contrary to the core value orientation of the right Relief Law of the Tort liability Law, and the relief to the injured students is not enough.There is a lack of fairness and justice from the point of view of what should be done.In view of this, this paper makes a horizontal and vertical comparative analysis of Article 40 of the Tort liability Law based on the "imputation principle" and "legal interest protection and relief of the victim": horizontally,Through the comparative analysis of article 40 with articles 37 and 38, it can be seen that the existence of article 40 makes the whole system of Tort Law appear different or disordered day by day.Through the analysis of the value orientation of Article 40, it can be seen that Article 40 is contrary to the core value orientation of the right remedy Law of Tort liability Law.Finally, from the angle of interpretation and legislation, the article 40 of the Tort liability Law is discussed and suggested to benefit the injured students, in order to balance the legal interests of the injured students in the position of the disadvantaged groups.
【學位授予單位】：蘭州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 曾大鵬;;第三人侵害學生事故中的學校責任[J];法學;2012年07期

2 劉召成;;安全保障義務的擴展適用與違法性判斷標準的發(fā)展[J];法學;2014年05期

3 周江紅;;大規(guī)模校園侵權(quán)的法律救濟[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2014年02期

4 李永軍;;論《侵權(quán)責任法》關(guān)于多數(shù)加害人的責任承擔方式[J];法學論壇;2010年02期

5 邢冰;;學生傷害事故法律責任分析及相關(guān)制度設計——以義務教育階段中小學為考察視角[J];法學論壇;2014年01期

6 王永霞;;《侵權(quán)責任法》的價值悖反及批判[J];法學論壇;2014年01期

，

本文編號：1706169