本文選題：TPP　切入點(diǎn)：網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者　出處：《北京外國語大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：在著作權(quán)網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)中,行為人的侵權(quán)行為往往需要借助網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者所提供的服務(wù)或設(shè)施,因此探討網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者在此情形下是否以及如何承擔(dān)著作權(quán)侵權(quán)責(zé)任的問題,一直伴隨著著整個(gè)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)技術(shù)的發(fā)展。網(wǎng)絡(luò)產(chǎn)業(yè)和著作權(quán)產(chǎn)業(yè)背后所包含的巨大經(jīng)濟(jì)價(jià)值,使得發(fā)達(dá)國家開始尋求建立更高的保護(hù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn),以維護(hù)其海外利益。由于越來越多的發(fā)展中國家能夠表達(dá)自身的利益訴求參與國際談判,尋求建立如WIPO或者WTO的多邊談?wù)撚永щy。在此背景下,發(fā)達(dá)國家尋求通過建立地區(qū)談判以達(dá)到其跨國保護(hù)知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的目的,TPP便是在此背景下制定和討論的。 TPP是由包括美國、日本等12個(gè)太平洋地區(qū)的國家參與談判的。從披露的TPP文本來看,目前還處于談判階段的TPP代表了未來知識產(chǎn)權(quán)國際保護(hù)的最高標(biāo)準(zhǔn),要求網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者承擔(dān)更多的注意義務(wù)。TPP圍繞網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者的免責(zé)條件、法定義務(wù)和通知與移除規(guī)則問題進(jìn)行談判,體現(xiàn)了各參與談判國的立法意志。因此,研究TPP中網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者的責(zé)任問題,有助于我們了解該領(lǐng)域內(nèi)的立法動(dòng)態(tài),同時(shí),也是未來我國參與國際條約的重要參考�；诖�,本文除引言和結(jié)語外,分以下三個(gè)部分進(jìn)行架構(gòu)： 第一部分,網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者著作權(quán)侵權(quán)責(zé)任概述。本章主要介紹網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者的基本概念,如何認(rèn)定網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者的范圍,以及網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者的著作權(quán)侵權(quán)責(zé)任類型。 第二部分,TPP中網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者責(zé)任問題研究。本章立足于目前披露的兩個(gè)版本的TPP,對比、分析兩個(gè)文本中的不同之處,同時(shí)闡述各個(gè)條款的適用邏輯,歸納,整理TPP中所代表的國際知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)的最高保護(hù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。 第三部分,我國網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者著作權(quán)侵權(quán)責(zé)任的立法和建議。梳理我國目前網(wǎng).絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者著作權(quán)侵權(quán)責(zé)任的法律制度,分析該制度與TPP的異同,以及TPP對我國的啟示。
[Abstract]:In the network copyright infringement, the infringement behavior of people often need the help of services or facilities to provide Internet service providers, so the discussion of the network service provider in this case whether and how to undertake the copyright infringement liability, has been accompanied by the development of Internet technology. The network behind the industry and copyright industries included the huge economic value, the developed countries began to seek to establish higher standards of protection, to protect its overseas interests. Due to the increasing number of developing countries to express their interest appeal to participate in international negotiations, seeking to establish such as WIPO or WTO multilateral talk more difficult. Under this background, the developed countries to seek to achieve the international protection of intellectual the purpose of property rights through the establishment of regional negotiations, TPP is developed and discussed in this context.
TPP is by including the United States, Japan and other 12 countries in the Pacific region involved in the negotiations. From the text of the TPP disclosure, is still in the negotiation stage of the TPP represents the future of the highest standards of international protection of intellectual property rights, the exemption conditions require internet service providers to bear.TPP duty of care more about the Internet service provider, to negotiate notice and remove the legal obligations and rules, reflects the will of the legislation involved in the negotiations of China. Therefore, the responsibility of the network service provider TPP, helps us understand the legislation in the field of dynamic, at the same time, it is also an important reference for the future of China's participation in international treaties. Based on this, in addition to the introduction and the epilogue is divided into three parts for architecture:
The first part is the overview of the copyright infringement liability of the Internet service providers. This chapter mainly introduces the basic concept of the network service providers, how to identify the scope of the network service providers, and the types of copyright infringement liability of the network service providers.
The second part of the network service provider liability in TPP. This chapter is based on the two version of the present disclosure, TPP, comparative analysis of the difference between the two texts in the application logic, and explains the various terms of induction, the highest standards of protection finishing the international protection of intellectual property rights represented by TPP.
The third part, the legislation and suggestion of the copyright infringement liability of our Internet service providers. We comb the legal system of the copyright infringement liability of our online service providers, analyze the similarities and differences between the system and TPP, and TPP's inspiration to China.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：北京外國語大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923.41

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉昌黎;;TPP的內(nèi)容、特點(diǎn)與日本參加的難題[J];東北亞論壇;2011年03期

2 劉中偉;沈家文;;跨太平洋伙伴關(guān)系協(xié)議(TPP):研究前沿與架構(gòu)[J];當(dāng)代亞太;2012年01期

3 左玉茹;;ACTA的飛躍 基于ACTA與TRIPS協(xié)定的比較研究[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2010年11期

4 吳漢東;;侵權(quán)責(zé)任法視野下的網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)責(zé)任解析[J];法商研究;2010年06期

5 王遷;;論版權(quán)“間接侵權(quán)”及其規(guī)則的法定化[J];法學(xué);2005年12期

6 黃先蓉;李魏娟;;從SOPA的博弈看美國數(shù)字出版法律制度的利益平衡[J];現(xiàn)代出版;2012年06期

7 鄭雙雙;;淺析TPP協(xié)定投資草案[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2013年10期

8 劉宇;;TPP知識產(chǎn)權(quán)最大化國際保護(hù)新發(fā)展析論——以著作權(quán)若干規(guī)則為切入點(diǎn)[J];北京理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年04期

9 司曉;范露瓊;;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域“通知—?jiǎng)h除”規(guī)則濫用的法律規(guī)制[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2015年Z1期

10 楊明;;《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》第36條釋義及其展開[J];華東政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2010年03期

，

本文編號：1706126