本文選題：人格權(quán)　切入點(diǎn)：死者人格利益　出處：《復(fù)旦大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：近年來(lái),有關(guān)死者人格利益的糾紛時(shí)有發(fā)生。當(dāng)死者人格利益遭受侵害時(shí),在民事法律上應(yīng)如何加以保護(hù)這一問(wèn)題引發(fā)了社會(huì)各界的關(guān)注。在我國(guó)法學(xué)界,學(xué)者對(duì)死者人格利益保護(hù)的研究熱情日益高漲,從不同維度提出了眾多創(chuàng)見；在司法實(shí)踐中,我國(guó)最高人民法院出臺(tái)了一系列相關(guān)的司法解釋,一些法院也對(duì)保護(hù)死者人格利益的實(shí)務(wù)操作作出了積極有益的探索。但同時(shí),也應(yīng)看到,在學(xué)術(shù)研究領(lǐng)域,對(duì)死者人格利益保護(hù)的最佳途徑尚無(wú)定論；在立法上,對(duì)死者人格利益保護(hù)的法律規(guī)定尚不成熟；在司法實(shí)踐中,很多法律適用和具體操作問(wèn)題尚未明確,需要作更為深入的探討。 本文在厘清死者人格利益的概念內(nèi)涵、分析學(xué)術(shù)界對(duì)死者人格利益保護(hù)的主要學(xué)說(shuō)及國(guó)外保護(hù)現(xiàn)狀的基礎(chǔ)上,提出了“死者人格利益保護(hù)說(shuō)”,并對(duì)我國(guó)死者人格利益保護(hù)的立法和司法提出了完善建議。正文從以下六部分展開論述： 第一部分闡述保護(hù)死者人格利益的現(xiàn)實(shí)性和必要性。通過(guò)對(duì)相關(guān)案例的介紹、分析及價(jià)值判斷,說(shuō)明保護(hù)死者人格利益的現(xiàn)實(shí)性和必要性。同時(shí)提出我國(guó)死者人格利益保護(hù)機(jī)制存在的問(wèn)題,如何解決這些問(wèn)題是本文討論的主要內(nèi)容。 第二部分厘清與死者人格利益相關(guān)的幾個(gè)概念內(nèi)涵。明確人格、人格權(quán)、人格利益這幾個(gè)基本概念及它們之間的關(guān)系。從而進(jìn)一步界定死者人格利益的內(nèi)涵。這些概念是全文論述的著眼點(diǎn)和出發(fā)點(diǎn)。 第三部分介紹和探討學(xué)術(shù)界關(guān)于死者人格利益保護(hù)的幾種主要學(xué)說(shuō)。分析每種學(xué)說(shuō)的合理性和局限性,并在此基礎(chǔ)上提出“死者人格利益保護(hù)說(shuō)”。 第四部分介紹國(guó)外死者人格利益保護(hù)的現(xiàn)狀。分別考察具有代表意義的英美法系和大陸法系國(guó)家、地區(qū)死者人格利益保護(hù)的現(xiàn)狀。為我國(guó)死者人格利益保護(hù)機(jī)制的建立提供思路和經(jīng)驗(yàn)。 第五部分闡述我國(guó)死者人格利益保護(hù)的立法現(xiàn)狀。介紹和分析在我國(guó)司法實(shí)踐中與死者人格利益保護(hù)相關(guān)的四個(gè)司法解釋。 第六部分提出完善我國(guó)死者人格利益保護(hù)的立法及司法建議。立法上進(jìn)一步完善死者人格尊嚴(yán)和具體人格利益保護(hù)的法律規(guī)定；司法上建立死者人格利益保護(hù)的請(qǐng)求制度。
[Abstract]:In recent years, disputes about the personality interests of the deceased have occurred from time to time. When the personal interests of the deceased are infringed upon, the problem of how to protect the interests of the deceased in civil law has aroused the attention of all circles of the society. Scholars' enthusiasm for the protection of the deceased's personality interests is growing, and many innovative ideas have been put forward from different dimensions. In judicial practice, the Supreme people's Court of our country has issued a series of related judicial explanations. Some courts have also made positive and beneficial explorations on the practical operation of protecting the interests of the deceased. But at the same time, it should also be noted that in the field of academic research, the best way to protect the interests of the deceased has not yet been decided; in legislation, The legal provisions on the protection of the personality interests of the deceased are not yet mature; in judicial practice, many problems concerning the application of the law and the specific operation have not yet been clarified, so it is necessary to make a more thorough discussion. On the basis of clarifying the connotation of the concept of the deceased's personality interests, analyzing the main theories of the academic circles on the protection of the deceased's personality interests and the present situation of the protection of the deceased's personality interests abroad, This paper puts forward the theory of the protection of the personality interests of the deceased, and puts forward some suggestions to perfect the legislation and judicature of the protection of the interests of the deceased in our country. The text is discussed from the following six parts:. The first part describes the reality and necessity of protecting the interests of the deceased. Through the introduction of relevant cases, analysis and value judgment, This paper illustrates the reality and necessity of protecting the interests of the deceased, and points out the problems existing in the mechanism of protecting the interests of the deceased in China, and how to solve these problems is the main content of this paper. The second part clarifies several concepts related to the interests of the deceased's personality. These basic concepts of personality interest and their relationship, thus further define the connotation of the deceased's personal interests. These concepts are the starting point and starting point of the full text. The third part introduces and discusses several main theories about the protection of the personality interests of the deceased in academic circles, analyzes the rationality and limitation of each theory, and puts forward the theory of the protection of the interests of the deceased personality on this basis. The fourth part introduces the status quo of the protection of the interests of the deceased in foreign countries. The present situation of the protection of the personality interests of the deceased in the region provides the train of thought and experience for the establishment of the protection mechanism of the personality interests of the deceased in our country. The fifth part expounds the legislative status of the protection of the personality interests of the deceased in our country, and introduces and analyzes four judicial explanations related to the protection of the interests of the deceased in the judicial practice of our country. The sixth part puts forward the legislative and judicial suggestions to perfect the protection of the interests of the deceased in our country. In legislation, it further consummates the legal provisions of the protection of the human dignity and the specific interests of the deceased, and establishes the request system for the protection of the interests of the deceased in the judicial field.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D923.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉國(guó)濤;死者生前人格利益民法保護(hù)的法理基礎(chǔ)——讀《死者生前人格利益的民法保護(hù)》后的再思考[J];比較法研究;2004年04期

2 耿焰;人格權(quán)的雙棲性與人格利益保護(hù)[J];東方論壇(青島大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2004年03期

3 張紅;;死者人格精神利益保護(hù):案例比較與法官造法[J];法商研究;2010年04期

4 麻昌華;論死者名譽(yù)的法律保護(hù)——兼與楊立新諸先生商榷[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));1996年06期

5 讓·米歇爾·布律格耶爾;肖芳;王軼;;人格權(quán)與民法典——人格權(quán)的概念和范圍[J];法學(xué)雜志;2011年01期

6 馬俊駒;;論作為私法上權(quán)利的人格權(quán)[J];法學(xué);2005年12期

7 楊巍;;死者人格利益之保護(hù)期限[J];法學(xué);2012年04期

8 賈辰君;;人人都有獲得基本財(cái)產(chǎn)的權(quán)利——由人格平等想到的[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(中旬刊);2008年07期

9 王全弟;李挺;;論死者人格精神利益的民法保護(hù)[J];法治研究;2011年11期

10 徐玉春;;胎兒時(shí)期受到侵害的損害賠償請(qǐng)求研究[J];廣東科技;2011年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：1698457