本文選題：善意取得　切入點：善意　出處：《海南大學(xué)》2016年碩士論文

【摘要】：善意取得制度是立法在所有權(quán)的保護(hù)與受讓人的保護(hù),即靜的安全與動的安全之間進(jìn)行價值取舍和利益權(quán)衡過程中逐漸構(gòu)建起來的一項物權(quán)制度。不管是在司法領(lǐng)域還是在實務(wù)領(lǐng)域,學(xué)者們相對善意取得制度中對于“善意”要件證明責(zé)任應(yīng)當(dāng)如何分配的觀點都各執(zhí)一詞。文章旨在通過實體法與程序法兩大領(lǐng)域的分析,尋找出一個更加切合善意取得立法精神,更能體現(xiàn)民事訴訟法公平正義原則,且充分考慮到當(dāng)事人各方證明難易程度的分配標(biāo)準(zhǔn),為當(dāng)前民事訴訟實務(wù)領(lǐng)域“善意”要件證明責(zé)任分配標(biāo)準(zhǔn)提供一些理論建議。市場經(jīng)濟(jì)不斷發(fā)展,交易的頻度和速度也在提升,越來越需要相應(yīng)的確保交易安全和物上權(quán)利實現(xiàn)的法律機(jī)制,善意取得制度就是這樣的法律機(jī)制,在法律范疇上屬于民法,近年來,對于善意取得制度的研究逐漸深廣,立法也越發(fā)完善。善意取得制度在我國法律上的表現(xiàn)是《物權(quán)法》第106條對其進(jìn)行了規(guī)定,雖然存在不足之處,對于善意取得制度在我國法律上的發(fā)展具有重要的意義。本論文將從以下五部分闡述這一制度：第一部分從分析兩個在審判實務(wù)工作中具有典型意義的案例入手,引出兩個對立的善意要件證明責(zé)任分配標(biāo)準(zhǔn)觀點,進(jìn)而引出本文的主題。第二部分分析了當(dāng)前我國善意要件證明責(zé)任分配的立法現(xiàn)狀,從語義解釋和體系解釋兩方面,結(jié)合與善意相關(guān)的其他法條,得出我國現(xiàn)行立法下證明責(zé)任由受讓人承擔(dān)。第三部分介紹了證明責(zé)任的基本理論以及證明責(zé)任分配的規(guī)則。第四部分提出了對善意要件證明責(zé)任的分配標(biāo)準(zhǔn)進(jìn)行立法工作完善的相關(guān)建議,并認(rèn)為在目前有待完備的相關(guān)立法的情況下,可以賦予法官自由裁量權(quán)來作為司法實務(wù)部門“善意”證明責(zé)任分配混亂的臨時解決機(jī)制。
[Abstract]:The system of bona fide acquisition is the protection of the legislation in the ownership and the protection of the transferee. That is, a real right system gradually constructed in the course of value trade-off and benefit tradeoff between static security and moving security, whether in the judicial field or in the practical field. Scholars hold different views on how to distribute the burden of proof in bona fide acquisition system. This paper aims at analyzing the two major fields of substantive law and procedural law. Looking for a more bona fide legislative spirit that can better reflect the principle of fairness and justice in civil procedure law, and take fully into account the allocation criteria for the parties to prove the degree of difficulty, It provides some theoretical suggestions for the criterion of "bona fide" burden allocation in the field of civil litigation practice. The market economy is developing constantly, and the frequency and speed of transactions are also increasing. There is more and more need for the corresponding legal mechanism to ensure the security of transactions and the realization of rights in things. The system of bona fide acquisition is such a legal mechanism, which belongs to the civil law in the scope of law. In recent years, the research on the system of bona fide acquisition has gradually deepened. The system of bona fide acquisition in our country's law is stipulated in Article 106 of the Real right Law, although there are some shortcomings, This paper will expound this system from the following five parts: the first part begins with the analysis of two typical cases in the judicial practice. In the second part, the author analyzes the current legislative situation of the burden of proof assignment of bona fide elements in China, from the two aspects of semantic interpretation and system interpretation. Combined with other articles relating to good faith, It is concluded that the burden of proof is borne by the transferee under the current legislation of our country. The third part introduces the basic theory of the burden of proof and the rules of the distribution of the burden of proof. The fourth part puts forward the criteria for the allocation of the burden of proof in good faith. Relevant suggestions for the perfection of legislative work, Under the condition that the relevant legislation is needed, the judge can be given discretion to act as a temporary solution to the confusion in the distribution of the burden of proof in "good faith" in the judicial practice department.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：海南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：D923.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉芷辰;;論占有改定與善意取得[J];法制博覽;2016年05期

2 牛彤;;論善意取得制度[J];法制博覽;2016年05期

3 歐元捷;;論民事訴訟主張責(zé)任法理[J];山東警察學(xué)院學(xué)報;2016年01期

4 周瀅婷;;論善意取得中善意的判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)[J];法制博覽;2015年36期

5 趙雪微;;善意取得在夫妻財產(chǎn)交易中的法律適用[J];商;2015年46期

6 鐘維;;論民法中的推定規(guī)范[J];東方法學(xué);2015年06期

7 李新天;何可人;;論我國不動產(chǎn)登記簿的效力[J];中國不動產(chǎn)法研究;2015年02期

8 劉競元;;不動產(chǎn)交付占有物權(quán)變動效力的證成與其對抗力分析[J];政治與法律;2015年10期

9 王雷;;我國民法典中證據(jù)規(guī)范的配置——以證明責(zé)任規(guī)范為中心[J];法商研究;2015年05期

10 袁中華;;證明責(zé)任分配的一般原則及其適用——《民事訴訟法》司法解釋第91條之述評[J];法律適用;2015年08期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 姚磊;我國不動產(chǎn)善意取得制度法律問題研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號：1698845