論管制規(guī)范對(duì)侵權(quán)責(zé)任的影響
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-03-31 13:38
本文選題:管制規(guī)范 切入點(diǎn):保護(hù)他人之法律 出處:《河北法學(xué)》2017年04期
【摘要】:公私法的融合趨勢(shì)要求作為公法的管制規(guī)范與作為私法的侵權(quán)法能夠相互銜接形成聯(lián)動(dòng)態(tài)勢(shì),在此背景下管制規(guī)范以"保護(hù)他人之法律"進(jìn)入到侵權(quán)法,通過(guò)對(duì)"過(guò)錯(cuò)的認(rèn)定"發(fā)揮作用進(jìn)而對(duì)侵權(quán)責(zé)任施加影響。違反或者遵守管制規(guī)范要么可以直接認(rèn)定過(guò)錯(cuò)的有無(wú),要么可以推定過(guò)錯(cuò)的有無(wú),要么僅僅充當(dāng)過(guò)錯(cuò)有無(wú)的證明。然而對(duì)于無(wú)過(guò)錯(cuò)侵權(quán)類型而言,除非有特別規(guī)定,否則違反或者遵守管制規(guī)范對(duì)于侵權(quán)責(zé)任的承擔(dān)不生影響。在產(chǎn)品侵權(quán)等可以兼而適用過(guò)錯(cuò)責(zé)任和無(wú)過(guò)錯(cuò)責(zé)任的場(chǎng)合,應(yīng)否認(rèn)管制規(guī)范對(duì)侵權(quán)責(zé)任可以發(fā)生影響,否則便會(huì)使已經(jīng)確立的無(wú)過(guò)錯(cuò)責(zé)任向過(guò)錯(cuò)責(zé)任復(fù)歸。
[Abstract]:The trend of the convergence of public and private law requires that the regulatory norm of public law and the tort law as private law can link up with each other to form a linkage situation. In this context, the regulatory norms enter into the tort law by "the law of protection of others". By exerting the function of "fault determination" and then exerting influence on tort liability. Violation of or compliance with regulatory norms can either directly identify the existence or absence of fault, or can be presumed to have or not. Or only as proof of fault. However, in the case of the type of no-fault infringement, unless otherwise specified, Otherwise, violation of or compliance with regulatory norms will not have any impact on the assumption of tort liability. In cases where product tort can be applied to both fault liability and no-fault liability, it should be denied that regulatory norms may have an impact on tort liability, Otherwise, the established non-fault liability will be returned to fault liability.
【作者單位】: 天津醫(yī)科大學(xué)醫(yī)學(xué)人文學(xué)院;
【基金】:國(guó)家社科基金《藥品侵權(quán)問(wèn)題研究》(14CFX032)
【分類號(hào)】:D923
,
本文編號(hào):1690973
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/1690973.html
最近更新
教材專著