本文選題：懲罰性賠償　切入點(diǎn)：消費(fèi)者　出處：《昆明理工大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：懲罰性賠償制度產(chǎn)生于英美法系,后來逐漸擴(kuò)展到其他國(guó)家,包括大陸法系國(guó)家也運(yùn)用廣泛。懲罰性損害賠償與補(bǔ)償性賠償相比,其賠償金額更高,補(bǔ)償性賠償主要是為了彌補(bǔ)消費(fèi)者的實(shí)際損失,在法理中,補(bǔ)償性賠償是填補(bǔ)損失,恢復(fù)受害者權(quán)利的一種方式。懲罰性賠償不僅帶有填補(bǔ)損害、恢復(fù)權(quán)利的功能,而且更重要的是懲罰加害方的不法行為,讓加害方的違法成本遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)高于所得收益。懲罰被告的不法行為而判給原告的一筆賠償金,能彌補(bǔ)受害者在訴訟過程中所花費(fèi)的律師費(fèi)、時(shí)間及精力上的付出等間接損失。近二十年來,在涉及產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量糾紛的消費(fèi)者維權(quán)和索賠中,懲罰性賠償制度越來越受我國(guó)法律界的重視。在我國(guó)最早的關(guān)于保護(hù)消費(fèi)者權(quán)益的法律中,就曾經(jīng)確立了這一制度。在2014年修訂的《消費(fèi)者權(quán)益保護(hù)法》55條中將其修改完善,懲罰性賠償制度的確立體現(xiàn)了對(duì)消費(fèi)者傾斜保護(hù)的理念,因這一制度具有懲罰、遏制、嚇阻等功能,能有效制裁不法經(jīng)營(yíng)者,符合大多數(shù)受害者的利益訴求,能發(fā)揮其應(yīng)有作用。本文首先運(yùn)用歷史研究方法系統(tǒng)闡述懲罰性賠償制度的發(fā)展歷史,基于法理學(xué)的視角,分析總結(jié)懲罰性賠償在消費(fèi)者保護(hù)領(lǐng)域的應(yīng)用、性質(zhì)以及功能等；通過對(duì)比國(guó)外以及其他地區(qū)相關(guān)立法與我國(guó)立法的相同點(diǎn)與不同點(diǎn),借鑒國(guó)外先進(jìn)的立法經(jīng)驗(yàn),彌補(bǔ)我國(guó)相關(guān)立法的不足；從我國(guó)懲罰性賠償?shù)倪m用條件、概念定義、賠償標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、完善賠償機(jī)制與監(jiān)督機(jī)制等五個(gè)方面提出自己的建議,以求對(duì)完善相關(guān)立法,并對(duì)懲罰性制度適用提出可行性的制度設(shè)計(jì),為保護(hù)消費(fèi)者合法權(quán)益貢獻(xiàn)自己的一份力量。
[Abstract]:Punitive damages came into being in Anglo-American law system, and gradually extended to other countries, including civil law countries. Punitive damages are higher than compensatory damages. Compensatory compensation is mainly to make up for the actual loss of consumers. In legal theory, compensatory compensation is a way to compensate for the loss and restore the rights of the victims. Moreover, what is more important is to punish the wrongdoing of the offending party, so that the illegal cost of the offending party is far higher than the gain. A sum of compensation awarded to the plaintiff by punishing the defendant for the illegal act can make up for the lawyer's fee spent by the victim in the course of the lawsuit. Indirect loss of time and effort. In the past 20 years, in consumer rights and claims involving product quality disputes, The punitive damages system has been paid more and more attention by the legal profession of our country. In our country's earliest law on protecting the rights and interests of consumers, this system was established. It was amended and perfected in Article 55 of the Consumer Rights and interests Protection Law, which was amended in 2014. The establishment of punitive damages system reflects the idea of preferential protection to consumers, because this system has the functions of punishment, containment and deterring, and can effectively sanction illegal operators, which is in line with the interests of most victims. Firstly, this paper uses the historical research method to systematically explain the development history of punitive damages system, based on the perspective of jurisprudence, analyzes and summarizes the application, nature and function of punitive damages in the field of consumer protection. By comparing the similarities and differences between the relevant legislation of foreign countries and other regions and the legislation of our country, we can learn from the advanced legislative experience of foreign countries and make up for the deficiency of the relevant legislation of our country. In order to perfect the relevant legislation and the application of the punitive system, the author puts forward his own suggestions in five aspects, such as the standard of compensation, the perfection of the compensation mechanism and the supervision mechanism. To protect the legitimate rights and interests of consumers to contribute their part of the force.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：昆明理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D923.8

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 趙紅梅;;美、德新型懲罰性賠償對(duì)我國(guó)《消法》修訂的啟示[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2011年05期

2 劉俊海;徐海燕;;我國(guó)懲罰性賠償制度的解釋與創(chuàng)新[J];法律適用;2013年10期

3 楊立新;“王海現(xiàn)象”的民法思考──論消費(fèi)者權(quán)益保護(hù)中的懲罰性賠償金[J];河北法學(xué);1997年05期

4 崔明峰,歐山;英美法上懲罰性賠償制度研究[J];河北法學(xué);2000年03期

5 錢玉文;劉永寶;;消費(fèi)者權(quán)益保護(hù)中的政府責(zé)任解讀——基于風(fēng)險(xiǎn)社會(huì)的視角[J];常州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年04期

6 艾爾肯;張榆;;論《食品安全法》中的懲罰性賠償制度——兼評(píng)《食品安全法》第96條[J];遼寧師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年05期

7 徐生成;;對(duì)雙倍賠償制度的思考——從《消費(fèi)者權(quán)益保護(hù)法修正案(草案)》的角度[J];金田;2013年07期

，

本文編號(hào)：1647422