本文選題：監(jiān)護(hù)制度　切入點(diǎn)：監(jiān)護(hù)人　出處：《大連理工大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：近年來(lái),精神病人傷人傷己事件頻發(fā),精神病人生活狀況令人堪憂,基本人權(quán)無(wú)法得到保障,越來(lái)越多的精神病人傷人或被傷事件已經(jīng)引起了社會(huì)的廣泛關(guān)注,精神病人是一個(gè)潛伏的高危人群,同時(shí)也是弱勢(shì)群體,由于監(jiān)護(hù)監(jiān)管力度的不夠,社會(huì)對(duì)精神病人產(chǎn)生恐懼心理的同時(shí),也忽視了對(duì)精神病人人權(quán)的保護(hù)。監(jiān)護(hù)制度是精神病人制度的重要組成部分,我國(guó)的監(jiān)護(hù)制度適用行為能力的宣告制度,對(duì)無(wú)民事行為能力人和限制民事行為能力人設(shè)立監(jiān)護(hù)人,對(duì)于未成年的精神病人適用未成年人監(jiān)護(hù)制度,對(duì)于成年精神病人適用成年人監(jiān)護(hù)制度,隨著精神病人數(shù)量的持續(xù)增長(zhǎng),我國(guó)精神病人監(jiān)護(hù)制度的問題和弊端日益顯現(xiàn),我國(guó)對(duì)精神病人設(shè)立的監(jiān)護(hù)制度比較簡(jiǎn)單化,沒有公共監(jiān)護(hù)制度。本文主要內(nèi)容要包括目的、方法、結(jié)果和結(jié)論。本文主要立足我國(guó)的精神病人生存現(xiàn)狀,分析我國(guó)現(xiàn)有精神病人監(jiān)護(hù)制度的不足與缺陷,同時(shí)借鑒兩大法系比較完善的成年人監(jiān)護(hù)制度,如德國(guó)和英國(guó)的相關(guān)制度,為完善我國(guó)的精神病人監(jiān)護(hù)制度提供些許參考建議。文章主要包括四部分內(nèi)容：第一部分主要論述精神病人監(jiān)護(hù)制度的基本理論,重點(diǎn)闡述了在醫(yī)學(xué)中和法學(xué)中對(duì)精神病人的定義,精神病人監(jiān)護(hù)制度的基本內(nèi)容,包括我國(guó)關(guān)于精神病人監(jiān)護(hù)的立法規(guī)定,意定監(jiān)護(hù)制度和精神病人公共監(jiān)護(hù)制度。第二部分介紹了國(guó)外關(guān)于精神病人監(jiān)護(hù)制度的立法和理論研究,重點(diǎn)介紹了相對(duì)比較完備的德國(guó)和英國(guó)的相關(guān)制度,以及對(duì)我國(guó)精神病人監(jiān)護(hù)制度立法和實(shí)踐的借鑒和啟示。第三部分主要闡述了我國(guó)現(xiàn)階段精神病人監(jiān)護(hù)制度的立法和司法實(shí)踐的不足與缺陷,相比較德日、英美存在的問題以及面臨的社會(huì)現(xiàn)實(shí)。第四部分主要是針對(duì)我國(guó)相關(guān)監(jiān)護(hù)制度的問題提出的完善建議和考量,借鑒國(guó)外經(jīng)驗(yàn)和制度,立足我國(guó)精神病人監(jiān)護(hù)的現(xiàn)狀,對(duì)其立法和司法實(shí)踐提出個(gè)人的完善建議。
[Abstract]:In recent years, mental patients hurt themselves frequently, the living conditions of mental patients are worrying, the basic human rights can not be guaranteed, and more and more mental patients hurt or injured has aroused the widespread concern of the society. Mental patients are a latent high-risk group, but also a vulnerable group. Due to insufficient supervision and supervision, the society has a fear of the mentally ill at the same time. The guardianship system is an important part of the mental patient system. The guardianship system in our country is applicable to the declaration system of behavior capacity. The establishment of guardians for persons with no capacity for civil conduct and persons with limited capacity for civil conduct, the application of the system of guardianship of minors to the mental patients of minors, and the application of the system of guardianship of adults to the mental patients of adults, With the continuous growth of the number of mental patients, the problems and drawbacks of the mental patient guardianship system in our country are becoming increasingly apparent. The guardianship system of mental patients established in our country is relatively simple and there is no public guardianship system. The main content of this paper should include the purpose. Methods, results and conclusions. Based on the living situation of mental patients in our country, this paper analyzes the deficiencies and defects of the present mental patient guardianship system in our country, and draws lessons from the more perfect adult guardianship system of the two major legal systems at the same time. For example, the related systems in Germany and Britain provide some reference and suggestions for perfecting the mental patient guardianship system in our country. The article mainly includes four parts: the first part mainly discusses the basic theory of the mental patient guardianship system, The definition of mental patient in medicine and law, the basic content of mental patient guardianship system, including the legislative provisions of mental patient guardianship in our country are expounded. The second part introduces the foreign legislation and theoretical research on the mental patient guardianship system, with emphasis on the relatively complete German and British systems. The third part mainly expounds the deficiency and defect of the legislation and judicial practice of the mental patient guardianship system in our country at the present stage, compared with Germany and Japan, the third part mainly expounds the deficiency and defect of the legislation and judicial practice of the mental patient guardianship system in our country. The problems in Britain and the United States and the social reality facing them. Part 4th is mainly about the perfect suggestions and considerations of the related guardianship system in our country, drawing lessons from foreign experiences and systems, and based on the present situation of mental patient guardianship in our country. To its legislation and judicial practice put forward personal suggestions for perfection.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D923.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 周艷玲;成年人監(jiān)護(hù)制度研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：1634459