本文選題：業(yè)主團(tuán)體　切入點(diǎn)：自治　出處：《江西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：業(yè)主團(tuán)體是我國進(jìn)行房改之后出現(xiàn)的一個(gè)新概念,實(shí)際上是小區(qū)各個(gè)業(yè)主為了實(shí)行個(gè)人利益和共同利益聚集起來管理小區(qū)事務(wù)的組織。各國立法對此有著不同的稱謂,法國《住宅分層所有權(quán)法》稱之為協(xié)同管理團(tuán)體;德國《住宅所有權(quán)法》稱之為住宅所有權(quán)人共同關(guān)系團(tuán)體,即住宅所有人共同體;日本《建筑物區(qū)分所有權(quán)法》將業(yè)主團(tuán)體按性質(zhì)的不同分為三類:管理團(tuán)體、管理組合法人及社區(qū)管理團(tuán)體。雖然各國立法的稱謂不同,但它的出現(xiàn)無疑對各國民法特別是建筑物區(qū)分所有權(quán)領(lǐng)域有著重大的意義。上世紀(jì)80年代商品房市場化趨勢逐漸加強(qiáng),各城市小區(qū)的數(shù)量、規(guī)模呈擴(kuò)張的態(tài)勢,人們的居住方式發(fā)生了巨大的變化,由以往獨(dú)門獨(dú)院的居住方式演變?yōu)榫奂谝黄鸬纳罘绞�。業(yè)主購買小區(qū)的房產(chǎn)后,除了需要處理專有部分所有權(quán)的關(guān)系,還因?yàn)楣灿貌糠值拇嬖谛枰幚砼c其他業(yè)主的關(guān)系即共用部分持份權(quán)。這種不同于以往的法律關(guān)系的出現(xiàn)為使得小區(qū)的管理更具復(fù)雜性。本文運(yùn)用比較分析、實(shí)證研究的方法,從業(yè)主團(tuán)體自治的相關(guān)概念入手,敘述業(yè)主團(tuán)體進(jìn)行管理需要遵守的原則和發(fā)揮的作用,然后運(yùn)用政治學(xué)、社會(huì)學(xué)、民法學(xué)理論分析其理論的正當(dāng)性,同時(shí)結(jié)合國外立法論述其自治的內(nèi)容,包括進(jìn)行管理的內(nèi)容、業(yè)主公約、業(yè)主團(tuán)體的運(yùn)行等內(nèi)容,在上述理論的基礎(chǔ)上分析我國當(dāng)前業(yè)主團(tuán)體自治所面臨的一系列問題,如業(yè)主團(tuán)體法律定性的缺失、業(yè)主團(tuán)體與物業(yè)公司的關(guān)系定位不當(dāng)?shù)葐栴}。通過揭示我國業(yè)主團(tuán)體自治存在的不同問題,提出相關(guān)建議和措施,以期能夠豐富其理論,解決實(shí)踐中出現(xiàn)的部分問題,充分發(fā)揮出業(yè)主團(tuán)體在私法領(lǐng)域的功能和作用。
[Abstract]:The owners group after China's housing reform is the emergence of a new concept, is actually the plot each owners to implement individual interests and the common interests together the management of district affairs organization. The legislation has a different title, the French residential ownership law > < layer called the collaborative management group; German Housing Ownership Law > > called residential ownership common relationship between groups, namely all residential community; Japan condominium law > < the owners groups classified according to different properties into three categories: management group, corporate portfolio management and community management organizations. Although the legislation title, but it's undoubtedly of civil law especially buildings the distinction between ownership of the field is of great significance. The trend of the last century in 80s the real estate market gradually strengthened, the number of the city area, the scale is expanding trend, people Great changes have taken place in the way of living, evolving from the previous single family living together for life. The owners to purchase residential real estate, except to deal with exclusive part of the ownership, but also because part of the shared relationship between the need to deal with other owners that share holders of rights. This is different in the past the legal relationship in order to make the community management more complicated. This paper uses comparative analysis, empirical research methods, starting from the relevant concepts of the owners of autonomous group, the owners group management should abide by the principles and the role and use of political science, sociology, analysis the legitimacy of its theory of civil law the theory, combined with foreign legislation and discusses its autonomous content, including the content of the management, the Convention on the owners, owners group operation etc., in the theoretical basis Analysis of a series of problems in China's current owners autonomous group facing the basis, such as the lack of legal owner group qualitative, positioning the relationship between owners and property companies group improper. By revealing the different problems of our owners autonomous group, puts forward relevant suggestions and measures, in order to enrich the theory and solve the problems arising in practice, give full play to the function and role of the owners group in the field of private law.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：江西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923.2

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 錢小平;業(yè)主公約法律性質(zhì)之探討[J];北京工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年04期

2 何曉慧;;我國業(yè)主公約問題之探討[J];甘肅政法成人教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年01期

3 魯剛寧;;業(yè)主團(tuán)體法律人格研究[J];重慶工貿(mào)職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年02期

4 許步國;;對我國物業(yè)業(yè)主公約若干法律問題探討[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)與社會(huì)發(fā)展;2006年12期

5 鄭欣;;業(yè)主委員會(huì)的困境與出路探析[J];雞西大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2008年02期

6 譚玲;業(yè)主委員會(huì)法律地位之探析[J];南方經(jīng)濟(jì);2005年10期

7 馮慶福;;業(yè)主委員會(huì)法律地位分析及重構(gòu)[J];樂山師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年10期

8 高雅冰;;業(yè)主團(tuán)體法律地位之中外對比[J];河南理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年03期

9 李建軍;;淺析業(yè)主委員會(huì)的法律性質(zhì)[J];陜西廣播電視大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2010年02期

10 吳蕓蕓;;業(yè)主委員會(huì)自治困境探討[J];科技資訊;2013年33期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 陳仕菊;王濟(jì)維;;淺議小區(qū)業(yè)主成員權(quán)[A];當(dāng)代法學(xué)論壇（二○一○年第3輯）[C];2010年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 喬新生;業(yè)主委員會(huì)真能代表業(yè)主嗎[N];檢察日報(bào);2005年

2 維日律師事務(wù)所律師 羅慶鋒;談?wù)剺I(yè)主委員會(huì)備案的法律效力[N];法治快報(bào);2009年

3 孔琳;業(yè)主找“管家”難[N];中國房地產(chǎn)報(bào);2003年

4 韶關(guān)日報(bào)記者 彭饋〖凹?xì)J，

本文編號：1609280