本文選題：侵權(quán)按份責(zé)任　切入點(diǎn)：訴訟形態(tài)　出處：《現(xiàn)代法學(xué)》2017年05期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：侵權(quán)按份責(zé)任具有"內(nèi)外關(guān)系上的按份性",是其與連帶責(zé)任、不真正連帶責(zé)任、補(bǔ)充責(zé)任的重要區(qū)別。在訴訟形態(tài)的選擇上,針對(duì)"內(nèi)外關(guān)系上的按份性",有適用必要共同訴訟與普通共同訴訟兩種對(duì)立的觀點(diǎn)。案例分析表明,實(shí)踐中對(duì)待侵權(quán)按份責(zé)任所適用訴訟形態(tài)亦呈現(xiàn)出多樣化、任意化的特點(diǎn),未形成統(tǒng)一做法。其原因包括我國(guó)缺少將債與訴訟形態(tài)相聯(lián)系這一大陸法系的基本方式,且我國(guó)民事程序法的訴訟形態(tài)規(guī)定過(guò)于粗疏而缺乏可操作性。應(yīng)采取特殊化、具體化的解釋路徑解決此問(wèn)題,允許權(quán)利人起訴全部或部分按份責(zé)任人承擔(dān)責(zé)任�；诩m紛的一次性解決和權(quán)利實(shí)現(xiàn)的可能性,撤回部分起訴應(yīng)受到時(shí)間和具體理由的限制。在權(quán)利人部分起訴時(shí),基于查明事實(shí)和保障其他侵權(quán)人利益的目的,其他侵權(quán)人可以無(wú)獨(dú)立請(qǐng)求權(quán)第三人的身份加入訴訟。在存在未知名侵權(quán)人時(shí),適用單獨(dú)訴訟,直接對(duì)此作出裁判。
[Abstract]:The tort liability is the important difference between it and the joint liability, not true joint liability, supplementary liability. In the choice of litigation form, the tort liability has the "pratice of internal and external relations", which is the important difference between the tort liability and the joint and several liability, not true joint and several liability. In view of the "proportionality of internal and external relations", there are two opposing points of view: necessary joint action and common joint action. The case analysis shows that the litigation forms applicable to tort liability in practice also show the characteristics of diversification and arbitrariness. The reasons include the lack of the basic way of linking the debt with the litigation form in our country, and the lack of maneuverability in the form of litigation in the civil procedure law of our country. The specific interpretation path resolves this problem, allowing the obligee to sue in whole or in part for the liability of the person responsible for the dispute. The possibility of a one-time settlement based on the dispute and the realization of the right, The withdrawal of a partial prosecution shall be limited by time and specific reasons... in the case of partial prosecution by the obligee, the purpose is to establish the facts and safeguard the interests of the other infringers, Other infringers may join the action without the status of the third party of the independent right of claim.
【作者單位】： 中國(guó)人民大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：國(guó)家社科基金“邁向制度理性的民事程序研究”(14CFX028) 中國(guó)人民大學(xué)科研基金研究品牌計(jì)劃(中央高�；究蒲袠I(yè)務(wù)費(fèi)專項(xiàng)資金資助)“民事糾紛的多元化解決機(jī)制研究”(10XNI033)
【分類號(hào)】：D923

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 汪保春;;論高空拋物責(zé)任承擔(dān)——正義價(jià)值妥協(xié)下按份責(zé)任[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年30期

2 曹險(xiǎn)峰;;《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》第12條之按份責(zé)任正當(dāng)性論證——兼論第12條與第37條第2款的關(guān)系[J];蘇州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年02期

3 馬海云;;論共同侵權(quán)的連帶責(zé)任與按份責(zé)任[J];法制與社會(huì);2011年22期

4 饒雷際;;按份責(zé)任抑或連帶責(zé)任——論負(fù)事故責(zé)任的機(jī)動(dòng)車各方對(duì)受害者侵權(quán)責(zé)任形態(tài)[J];學(xué)術(shù)交流;2012年12期

5 閻玉珍;焦益華;;學(xué)生傷害事故中的連帶責(zé)任與按份責(zé)任[J];中小學(xué)管理;2012年09期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 案例編寫人 河南省內(nèi)鄉(xiāng)縣人民法院 楊慧文 郭曉菊;原因競(jìng)合侵權(quán)及按份責(zé)任的認(rèn)定[N];人民法院報(bào);2012年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 徐鵬麗;論自由裁量權(quán)在侵權(quán)按份責(zé)任中的適用[D];煙臺(tái)大學(xué);2016年

2 周明宏;尤某訴王某與路橋中心侵權(quán)糾紛案例評(píng)析[D];湖南大學(xué);2014年

，

本文編號(hào)：1577679