本文選題：網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易平臺(tái)　切入點(diǎn)：網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易平臺(tái)提供者　出處：《大連海事大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易平臺(tái)的興起,在通過新的交易方式和交易環(huán)境促進(jìn)了網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)濟(jì)的新發(fā)展的同時(shí),其獨(dú)有的特殊性也增加了交易雙方特別是消費(fèi)者的交易風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。處在發(fā)展初期的網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易尚未形成統(tǒng)一的交易慣例和穩(wěn)定的交易秩序,而我國(guó)的相關(guān)立法也不夠明確具體。因此在網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易糾紛發(fā)生后,由于交易中各主體的法律地位不清晰、法律義務(wù)不明確,各方的法律責(zé)任難以厘清,導(dǎo)致消費(fèi)者維權(quán)艱難,其合法權(quán)益得不到應(yīng)有的保護(hù)。明確網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易平臺(tái)提供者民事責(zé)任對(duì)促進(jìn)網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易發(fā)展因此具有十分重要的意義。本文共分為四個(gè)部分,第一部分是網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易平臺(tái)提供者的法律概述,從網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易平臺(tái)提供者的概念入手,分析網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易平臺(tái)的特征,通過歸納、分析網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易平臺(tái)提供者法律地位的不同學(xué)說(shuō)提出本文觀點(diǎn),并列舉和對(duì)比國(guó)內(nèi)外網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易制度的相關(guān)規(guī)定,為完善我國(guó)網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易平臺(tái)提供者民事責(zé)任制度奠定基礎(chǔ)。第二部分在對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易平臺(tái)提供者基本概念進(jìn)行分析的基礎(chǔ)上,結(jié)合我國(guó)現(xiàn)有的法律規(guī)定,從歸責(zé)原則和侵權(quán)責(zé)任形態(tài)兩個(gè)層面分析網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易平臺(tái)提供者的侵權(quán)責(zé)任。第三部分則結(jié)合網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易特征的內(nèi)在要求,對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易平臺(tái)提供者合同責(zé)任中的違約責(zé)任進(jìn)行著重分析,通過對(duì)其違約行為和免責(zé)事由的分析明確網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易平臺(tái)提供者的合同責(zé)任。在第四部分中,結(jié)合我國(guó)網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀,借鑒國(guó)外先進(jìn)立法經(jīng)驗(yàn),本文從確立網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易平臺(tái)提供者民事責(zé)任基本原則和完善我國(guó)網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易平臺(tái)提供者民事責(zé)任制度兩方面,對(duì)我國(guó)現(xiàn)行網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易平臺(tái)提供者法律規(guī)定的修改及未來(lái)網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易法律體系的構(gòu)建提出建議。網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易平臺(tái)提供者作為提供網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易服務(wù)的第三方,確定其在網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易中的法律地位和民事法律責(zé)任是研究探討網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易法律關(guān)系的基石,也是建立良好網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易秩序的基本前提。因此,本文盡量充分地收集了國(guó)內(nèi)、外的相關(guān)立法規(guī)定,在專家學(xué)者們對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易研究的基礎(chǔ)上,結(jié)合傳統(tǒng)民法理論,重點(diǎn)研究網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易平臺(tái)提供者的法律地位、法律義務(wù)和法律責(zé)任,并在此基礎(chǔ)上提出適用網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易平臺(tái)提供者民事責(zé)任制度的建議。
[Abstract]:The rise of the network trading platform promotes the new development of the network economy through the new transaction mode and the trading environment. Its unique particularity has also increased the transaction risk of both sides of the transaction, especially consumers. The network transactions in the early stages of its development have not yet formed a unified trading practice and a stable trading order. However, the relevant legislation of our country is not clear enough. Therefore, after the disputes over Internet transactions, the legal status of each subject in the transaction is not clear, the legal obligation is not clear, and the legal responsibilities of all parties are difficult to clarify, which leads to the difficulty of protecting the rights of consumers. Its legitimate rights and interests can not be properly protected. It is therefore very important to clarify the civil liability of network trading platform providers to promote the development of network transactions. This paper is divided into four parts. The first part is the legal overview of the network trading platform provider, starting with the concept of the network trading platform provider, analyzes the characteristics of the network trading platform, through induction, This paper analyzes the different theories of the legal status of the provider of the network trading platform, and lists and compares the relevant regulations of the network trading system at home and abroad. In the second part, on the basis of the analysis of the basic concept of the provider of the network trading platform, combined with the existing legal provisions of our country, From two aspects of liability principle and tort liability form, the author analyzes the tort liability of the provider of network trading platform. The third part combines the inherent requirements of the characteristics of network transaction. This paper focuses on the analysis of the liability for breach of contract in the contract liability of the provider of the online trading platform, and clarifies the contractual liability of the provider of the network trading platform through the analysis of its breach of contract and the reasons of exemption. In part 4th, Combined with the current situation of the development of network transaction in our country and the experience of foreign advanced legislation, this paper establishes the basic principles of the civil liability of the provider of the network trading platform and consummates the civil liability system of the provider of the network trading platform of our country. This paper puts forward some suggestions on the modification of the legal provisions of the current network trading platform provider and the construction of the future network transaction legal system. The network trading platform provider is the third party that provides the network transaction service. The determination of its legal status and civil legal liability in the network transaction is the cornerstone of the study on the legal relationship of the network transaction and the basic premise of establishing a good order of the network transaction. On the basis of the research of experts and scholars on the network transaction, combined with the traditional civil law theory, this paper focuses on the legal status, legal obligation and legal liability of the provider of the network trading platform. On this basis, the author puts forward some suggestions on how to apply the civil liability system of network trading platform provider.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 曾建飛;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易平臺(tái)提供商對(duì)消費(fèi)者之補(bǔ)充責(zé)任[J];法制與社會(huì);2012年09期

2 陳藝妮;金曉彤;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)購(gòu)物中基于信任—不信任視角的顧客細(xì)分研究[J];管理現(xiàn)代化;2010年01期

3 邱云;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者的連帶責(zé)任分析——對(duì)《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》第三十六條的思考[J];湖南公安高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2010年06期

4 劉穎;黃瓊;;論《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》中網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者的責(zé)任[J];暨南學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年03期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 鄭成思 薛虹;[N];經(jīng)濟(jì)參考報(bào);2000年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 唐莉;論網(wǎng)絡(luò)交易平臺(tái)提供商商標(biāo)侵權(quán)責(zé)任[D];湘潭大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：1577637