本文選題：現(xiàn)貨代購　切入點：平行進口　出處：《湖北警官學(xué)院學(xué)報》2016年01期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：網(wǎng)絡(luò)海外代購分為消費者指示代購和現(xiàn)貨代購,現(xiàn)貨代購是主要的代購方式之一。按消費者指示代購具有委托代理性質(zhì),現(xiàn)貨代購則是自營購銷的買賣行為�，F(xiàn)貨代購是平行進口行為,可分為B2C現(xiàn)貨代購和C2C現(xiàn)貨代購。現(xiàn)貨代購人不具有行紀商及代理人身份,而轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)樽誀I購銷的經(jīng)銷者。依據(jù)《商標法》第57條第1項、第3項及《侵權(quán)責任法》的相關(guān)規(guī)定,綜合權(quán)衡商標權(quán)人、代購商的利益和社會公共利益,原則上應(yīng)認定現(xiàn)貨代購構(gòu)成商標侵權(quán)。但是,現(xiàn)貨代購存在侵權(quán)的例外:只要未造成消費者混淆且不損害國內(nèi)商標權(quán)人的"獨立商譽",則應(yīng)在國內(nèi)外商標權(quán)人為"相同所有人"或"共同控制"情況下承認現(xiàn)貨代購的合法性。
[Abstract]:Online overseas purchasing is divided into consumer directed purchase and spot purchase, which is one of the main ways of purchasing goods. According to the instructions of consumers, it has the nature of entrustment and agency. Spot purchase is a self-owned purchase and sale behavior. Spot purchase is a parallel import act, which can be divided into B2C spot purchase and C2C spot purchase. The spot agent does not have the identity of broker or agent. In accordance with Article 57, item 1, item 3 of the Trademark Law and the relevant provisions of the Tort liability Law, the interests of the trademark owner, the agent purchaser and the public interest, In principle, it should be determined that spot purchase constitutes trademark infringement. However, There is an exception to the infringement of spot purchase: as long as the consumer is not confused and the "independent goodwill" of the domestic trademark owner is not damaged, it should be recognized if the trademark owner at home and abroad is the "same owner" or "joint control". The legitimacy of the purchase of goods on behalf of the goods.
【作者單位】： 武漢大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【分類號】：D923.43

【共引文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 王劍文;;國際貿(mào)易中知識產(chǎn)權(quán)壁壘的應(yīng)對策略研究[J];江蘇科技信息;2012年12期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 李冀君;中歐知識產(chǎn)權(quán)貿(mào)易摩擦及中國對策[D];湘潭大學(xué);2010年

2 杜春梅;國際知識產(chǎn)權(quán)例外制度研究[D];南昌大學(xué);2010年

3 龔s，

本文編號：1561408