本文關(guān)鍵詞： 日本專利法 間接侵權(quán) 專用品型 主觀意圖 修正論　出處：《河北法學(xué)》2017年01期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：我國在專利間接侵權(quán)制度的引入和具體規(guī)定上,多年來始終存在分歧和爭議,直到最新司法解釋和專利法第四次修改《修訂草案(送審稿)》的發(fā)布。日本采用該項制度迄今已逾50年,對侵權(quán)判定中的物品、行為人主觀意圖、直接侵權(quán)等要件具備相對成熟的法律規(guī)定、豐富的司法經(jīng)驗和現(xiàn)實教訓(xùn),對于我國有著一定借鑒意義。重點體現(xiàn)在:第一,我國在"非專用品型間接侵權(quán)"方面仍缺少規(guī)定,在未來立法中亟需補缺。一方面要充分認識"非專用品型"侵權(quán)物品的判定難度,另一方面應(yīng)審慎參考日本模式中的主觀要件;第二,警惕日本"專用品型"和"非專用品型"侵權(quán)的二元規(guī)定模式所導(dǎo)致的司法裁判中向"專用品型間接侵權(quán)"的逃逸;第三,有關(guān)直接侵權(quán)地位的"修正論"觀點更加符合市場和利益平衡的需要,相比其他觀點更加值得借鑒。
[Abstract]:Over the years, there have always been differences and disputes over the introduction and specific provisions of the system of indirect patent infringement in China. Up to the latest judicial interpretation and the publication of 4th revisions to the Patent Law, Japan has adopted this system for more than 50 years. Direct infringement and other elements have relatively mature legal provisions, rich judicial experience and practical lessons, which have certain reference significance for our country. The main points are as follows: first, there is still a lack of regulations on "indirect infringement of non-special products" in our country. On the one hand, we should fully understand the difficulty of judging the "non-exclusive goods" infringing goods, on the other hand, we should carefully refer to the subjective elements in the Japanese model; second, To guard against the escape of the "exclusive product indirect tort" caused by the dualistic prescriptive mode of "exclusive product type" and "non-exclusive product type" infringement in Japan; third, The "amendment theory" about the position of direct tort is more suitable for the needs of market and interest balance, and is more worthy of reference than other views.
【作者單位】： 北京大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【分類號】：D931.3;D923.42

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 熊文聰;;被誤讀的專利間接侵權(quán)規(guī)則——以美國法的變遷為線索[J];東方法學(xué);2011年01期

2 康添雄;田曉玲;;美國專利間接侵權(quán)的判定與抗辯[J];知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2006年06期

3 蔡元臻;;3D打印沖擊下專利間接侵權(quán)制度研究[J];科技與法律;2014年01期

4 葉曉云;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)間接侵權(quán)的侵權(quán)分析[J];法制與社會;2014年03期

5 康添雄;;美國專利間接侵權(quán)研究[J];重慶工學(xué)院學(xué)報;2006年06期

6 程e，

本文編號：1551235