本文關(guān)鍵詞： 繼承 限定繼承 債權(quán)人利益 遺產(chǎn)清算　出處：《廣西大學(xué)》2016年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：法律是社會(huì)現(xiàn)實(shí)的反映,伴隨著社會(huì)現(xiàn)實(shí)的發(fā)展,法律同樣經(jīng)歷了由簡(jiǎn)單向完善發(fā)展的過(guò)程。八十年代,我國(guó)《繼承法》設(shè)立了限定繼承制度,明確規(guī)定繼承人繼承遺產(chǎn)的,以遺產(chǎn)價(jià)值為限,對(duì)被繼承人生前債務(wù)負(fù)清償責(zé)任,這一規(guī)定打破了一直以來(lái)父?jìng)觾數(shù)膫鹘y(tǒng)觀念,是法制進(jìn)步的體現(xiàn)。但問(wèn)題在于該限定繼承制度在保護(hù)繼承人利益的同時(shí),卻未能對(duì)被繼承人債權(quán)人合法權(quán)益予以充分保護(hù)。隨著個(gè)人越來(lái)越廣泛的參與到經(jīng)濟(jì)活動(dòng)中,這一矛盾也愈發(fā)突出,對(duì)債權(quán)人利益的保護(hù),不僅涉及到債權(quán)人個(gè)人合法權(quán)益的實(shí)現(xiàn),更關(guān)系到社會(huì)整體交易安全的維護(hù),必須予以重視。通說(shuō)認(rèn)為,我國(guó)現(xiàn)行限定繼承制度主要存在以下兩方面問(wèn)題：一是實(shí)體上對(duì)繼承人在被繼承人債務(wù)清償中的義務(wù)和責(zé)任欠缺具體規(guī)定,繼承人的權(quán)利未受到應(yīng)有約束,可能侵害債權(quán)人利益；二是程序上未引入清算制度,繼承人履行清償義務(wù)缺乏方法和途徑。但在具體制度設(shè)計(jì)上,學(xué)者們對(duì)于應(yīng)以限定繼承為原則還是以概括繼承為原則,以及是否應(yīng)采全面清算制度爭(zhēng)議較大。本文結(jié)合我國(guó)實(shí)際情況,分析指出我國(guó)應(yīng)堅(jiān)持以限定繼承為原則,但要明確繼承人享受限定繼承利益所應(yīng)承擔(dān)的義務(wù)和責(zé)任；應(yīng)引入遺產(chǎn)清算制度,但繼承人白行清償仍應(yīng)為被繼承人債務(wù)清償?shù)闹饕问健?br/>[Abstract]:Law is the reflection of social reality. With the development of social reality, law has also gone through the process of development from simplicity to perfection. In 80s, China's inheritance Law established a limited inheritance system, which clearly stipulates that the heirs inherit the inheritance. Taking the value of inheritance as the limit, we should be responsible for paying off the debt of the deceased. This rule breaks the traditional idea of the repayment of the father's debt and son's debt, and is the embodiment of the progress of the legal system, but the problem lies in the fact that the limited inheritance system protects the interests of the heirs while protecting the interests of the heirs. But failed to fully protect the legitimate rights and interests of the heirs. As individuals become more and more involved in economic activities, this contradiction is becoming increasingly prominent, the protection of the interests of creditors, It is not only related to the realization of the legitimate rights and interests of creditors, but also related to the maintenance of the security of the whole social transaction, which must be attached importance to. There are two main problems in the current system of limited succession in our country: first, there are no specific provisions on the obligations and responsibilities of the heirs in paying off the debts of the heirs, and the rights of the heirs are not subject to due restraint. The other is that the liquidation system is not introduced in the procedure, and the heirs lack the ways and means to fulfill their repayment obligations. However, in the design of the specific system, scholars should regard limited succession as the principle or general succession as the principle. This paper points out that our country should adhere to the principle of limited inheritance, but should make clear the obligations and responsibilities of the heirs to enjoy the limited inheritance benefits. The system of estate liquidation should be introduced, but the principal form of settlement of the heirs'debts should still be paid off in vain.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣西大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D923.5

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 吳國(guó)平;;遺產(chǎn)繼承中債權(quán)人利益保護(hù)問(wèn)題探究[J];政法論叢;2013年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：1551048