本文關鍵詞： 共有人 優(yōu)先購買權(quán) 承租人 沖突 協(xié)調(diào)　出處：《蘭州大學》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：我國民事法律制度中的共有人優(yōu)先購買權(quán)和承租人優(yōu)先購買權(quán)有其獨特的法律價值和立法意義,但我國目前相關法律對這兩種優(yōu)先購買權(quán)的規(guī)定均較為籠統(tǒng)和分散。這便導致了在司法實踐中遇到此類訴訟時缺乏可操作性,尤其是對兩者有無發(fā)生沖突的可能,以及若發(fā)生沖突應如何協(xié)調(diào)并未做任何立法規(guī)定,從而針對此類問題在理論界產(chǎn)生了激烈討論,且司法實踐中也因?qū)Υ祟悊栴}沒有明確規(guī)定而導致當事人合法權(quán)益無法得到保證。因此,本人嘗試通過對共有人優(yōu)先購買權(quán)和承租人優(yōu)先購買權(quán)的概述、國內(nèi)外關于兩者的相關立法、兩者有無發(fā)生沖突的可能,以及兩者若發(fā)生沖突我們應如何協(xié)調(diào)等一系列問題的論述,繼而從有效協(xié)調(diào)兩者沖突的立法建議等方面提出如何通過借鑒國外相關先進立法,最終使我國共有人優(yōu)先購買權(quán)和承租人優(yōu)先購買權(quán)制度日臻完善。本文的結(jié)構(gòu)除引言和結(jié)語,共分為五個部分,即:第一部分是概括論述優(yōu)先購買權(quán)的一般理論。第二部分是對共有人優(yōu)先購買權(quán)以及包括我國在內(nèi)的諸多國家,對共有人優(yōu)先購買權(quán)的相關立法逐一進行深入而全面的探究,從而為我國共有人優(yōu)先購買權(quán)制度的優(yōu)化與改進提供科學參考。第三部分是對承租人優(yōu)先購買權(quán)及其他相關房屋主體優(yōu)先購買權(quán)之間所存在的沖突、其他國家對承租人優(yōu)先購買權(quán)的相關立法進行分析和研究,以便為進一步完善我國承租人優(yōu)先購買權(quán)制度提供一定借鑒。第四部分是對共有人優(yōu)先購買權(quán)和承租人優(yōu)先購買權(quán)是否會發(fā)生沖突,以及若發(fā)生沖突應如何協(xié)調(diào)進行論述。第五部分是對全文進行總結(jié),并合理參考其他國家相關的科學而合理的立法機制,從而為我國改進和優(yōu)化共有人優(yōu)先購買權(quán)制度和承租人優(yōu)先購買權(quán)制度提供合理而有效的立法建議。
[Abstract]:China's civil legal system of the co owner and lessee preemption has its unique legal value and legal significance, but China's current laws related to these two kinds of preemption provisions are more general and scattered. This led to such litigation in judicial practice and lack operation, especially for the two are in conflict, and how to coordinate the conflict did not make any legislation, thus to solve these problems in theoretical circles have a heated discussion, and also in the judicial practice because there is no clear regulations on such problems of the legitimate rights and interests of the parties can not be guaranteed. Therefore, I try to based on the total summary of pre emptive rights and the right of preemption of lessee, the relevant legislation of both at home and abroad, there is no conflict between the two, and in the event of conflict I They should be a series of problems such as how to coordinate the discussion, then present how to learn foreign advanced legislation from the effective coordination of the conflict between the legislative proposals, eventually make China owner and lessee preemption system is being perfected. The structure of this addition to the introduction and conclusion, is divided into five part: the first part is the general theory summarizes the priority purchase right. The second part is the co owner and many countries including China, the common legislative priority to purchase one by one into the deep and comprehensive research, provide scientific reference for optimization and improvement to our country a preemptive right system. The third part is on the right of preemption of lessee and other related housing the main purchasing priority conflict between the existence of other countries, the lessee's purchasing priority Analysis and Research on the related legislation, in order to further improve China's preemptive right system to provide certain reference. The fourth part is the co owner and lessee preemption would conflict, and the conflict should be how to coordinate the theory. The fifth part is a summary of the full text, and reasonable reference to other relevant national scientific and reasonable legislative mechanism, so as to improve and optimize our country there are legislative proposals of preemption system and the lessee preemption system to provide a reasonable and effective.

【學位授予單位】：蘭州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前3條

1 屈茂輝;;物盡其用與物權(quán)法的立法目標[J];當代法學;2006年04期

2 鄭永寬;;論按份共有人優(yōu)先購買權(quán)的法律屬性[J];法律科學(西北政法學院學報);2008年02期

3 王媚;;共有人與承租人優(yōu)先購買權(quán)相關問題探析[J];河南工程學院學報(社會科學版);2012年03期

相關碩士學位論文 前1條

1 程晉;論房屋承租人的優(yōu)先購買權(quán)[D];東北財經(jīng)大學;2012年

，

本文編號：1509404