發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-02-14 00:03

  本文關(guān)鍵詞： 第三人侵權(quán) 提供勞務(wù)者 請求權(quán)　出處：《煙臺大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：第三人侵權(quán)致提供勞務(wù)者受害賠償,既是提供勞務(wù)者受害賠償?shù)奶厥忸愋?也是侵權(quán)案件的特殊類型,在實(shí)踐中處理起來相當(dāng)復(fù)雜,但現(xiàn)行法律對此種關(guān)系的規(guī)定卻很有限,尤其是在請求權(quán)行使和歸責(zé)原則方面存在不少模糊和空白之處,如何認(rèn)定和處理在司法上賦予了法官太多的自由裁量權(quán),導(dǎo)致尺度無法統(tǒng)一,請求權(quán)行使也相當(dāng)混亂�！肚謾�(quán)責(zé)任法》頒行后,將提供勞務(wù)者受害賠償?shù)臍w責(zé)原則明確為按過錯(cuò)承擔(dān)責(zé)任,直接導(dǎo)致《最高法院人身損害賠償解釋》中受害勞務(wù)者請求選擇權(quán)失去相應(yīng)基礎(chǔ)依據(jù)。鑒于新舊法之間銜接不暢,應(yīng)明確廢止《最高法院人身損害賠償解釋》第十一條第一款的規(guī)定。既然受害勞務(wù)者不再享有向侵權(quán)第三人和接受勞務(wù)者的賠償請求選擇權(quán),就應(yīng)該有新的制度來平衡各方當(dāng)事人的利益。按照侵權(quán)責(zé)任法的過錯(cuò)原則,關(guān)于自然人之間形成的勞務(wù)關(guān)系中發(fā)生的第三人侵害,因其與違反安全保障義務(wù)的補(bǔ)充責(zé)任類型較為相近,二者在主體、歸責(zé)原則、過錯(cuò)性質(zhì)和利益維護(hù)上均存在高度一致性,因此,應(yīng)在侵權(quán)責(zé)任法中引入有限補(bǔ)充責(zé)任制度,在第三人侵權(quán)致提供勞務(wù)者受害時(shí),明確以第三人承擔(dān)侵權(quán)責(zé)任為前提,以接受勞務(wù)者承擔(dān)侵權(quán)責(zé)任為補(bǔ)充的請求權(quán)制度。
[Abstract]:The third party torts the victim compensation to the provider of labor service, is not only the special type of the victim compensation of the service provider, but also the special type of the tort case. In practice, it is quite complicated to deal with, but the current law has very limited provisions on this kind of relationship. In particular, there are many ambiguities and gaps in the exercise of the right of claim and the principle of imputation. How to identify and deal with the fact that too much discretion has been given to the judge in the administration of justice, which leads to a lack of uniform standards. After the enactment of the Tort liability Law, the principle of imputation of compensation for victims of labor providers is clearly defined as taking responsibility according to fault. As a direct result of the Supreme Court's interpretation of personal injury compensation, the injured labor workers' request for the right to choose loses the corresponding basis. In view of the lack of convergence between the new and the old laws, The provisions of Article 11th, paragraph 1, of the interpretation of personal injury compensation by the Supreme Court should be expressly repealed. Since the injured worker no longer has the option to claim compensation to the third party and the person receiving the service, There should be a new system to balance the interests of the parties concerned. According to the principle of fault in tort liability law, the third party infringement in the labor relations formed between natural persons, Because it is close to the type of supplementary liability for violating the obligation of safety and security, there is a high degree of consistency in the subject, the principle of imputation, the nature of fault and the maintenance of interests, so the limited supplementary liability system should be introduced into the law of tort liability. When the third party infringes upon the provider of labor, it is clear that the system of claim is based on the premise that the third party bears the tort liability and the accepting person assumes the tort liability as a supplement.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：煙臺大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 謝婧;;第三人侵權(quán)致雇員損害之雇主責(zé)任探究——兼析《最高人民法院<關(guān)于審理人身損害賠償案件適用法律若干問題的解釋>》第11條[J];法制博覽;2016年28期

2 張軍;;工傷保險(xiǎn)待遇補(bǔ)償與民事侵權(quán)賠償問題的思考[J];中國醫(yī)療保險(xiǎn);2016年09期

3 楊曦希;董正遠(yuǎn);;雇員可同時(shí)訴求雇主和侵權(quán)人賠償[J];人民司法;2015年14期

4 李冬;王洋;;《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》個(gè)人用工責(zé)任的正確理解與適用[J];法制與社會;2014年17期

5 楊立新;趙曉舒;;我國《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》中的第三人侵權(quán)行為[J];中國人民大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2013年04期

6 匡青松;;不真正連帶責(zé)任訴訟中若干實(shí)務(wù)問題探析[J];求索;2010年10期

7 王竹;;侵權(quán)法的體系化展開與類型化研究——楊立新教授侵權(quán)法思想研究[J];河南省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年05期

8 姜強(qiáng);;《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》中的連帶責(zé)任、不真正連帶責(zé)任及其訴訟程序[J];法律適用;2010年07期

9 鞏堅(jiān);;工傷與第三人侵權(quán)競合的法律適用問題[J];消費(fèi)導(dǎo)刊;2010年04期

10 喻承躍;;工傷賠償與民事侵權(quán)賠償?shù)年P(guān)系——從司法審判的角度審視[J];黑龍江省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年04期

，

本文編號：1509408