本文關(guān)鍵詞： P2P網(wǎng)貸 P2P平臺(tái) 用戶(hù)注冊(cè)協(xié)議 法律問(wèn)題 電子格式合同　出處：《西南政法大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：P2P網(wǎng)貸交易作為傳統(tǒng)借貸交易與互聯(lián)網(wǎng)技術(shù)融合的創(chuàng)新產(chǎn)物,在基本借貸法律關(guān)系上與傳統(tǒng)借貸并無(wú)二致。但由于交易形式從“線(xiàn)下”轉(zhuǎn)移到“線(xiàn)上”,使得借貸交易的邏輯由“熟人撮合”變?yōu)椤伴_(kāi)放交易”。這一交易邏輯的變化導(dǎo)致許多我國(guó)現(xiàn)行法律并未規(guī)定的問(wèn)題出現(xiàn),并且亟待解決。為了適應(yīng)現(xiàn)行法律框架的規(guī)定,避免“違法經(jīng)營(yíng)”以及觸碰“紅線(xiàn)”,國(guó)內(nèi)許多P2P平臺(tái)運(yùn)營(yíng)公司對(duì)國(guó)外較為成熟的P2P網(wǎng)貸交易模式進(jìn)行了不同程度的改良。由此國(guó)內(nèi)出現(xiàn)了四種基本交易模式:“線(xiàn)上純信用”模式、“線(xiàn)上有擔(dān)�！蹦Ｊ�、“線(xiàn)上為主、線(xiàn)下為輔”模式、“線(xiàn)上為輔、線(xiàn)下為主”模式。通過(guò)對(duì)前述四種模式的分析發(fā)現(xiàn),無(wú)論哪一種模式都涉及到P2P平臺(tái)運(yùn)營(yíng)公司與用戶(hù)之間的法律關(guān)系問(wèn)題。而該法律關(guān)系正是通過(guò)P2P平臺(tái)運(yùn)營(yíng)公司提供的電子格式合同——用戶(hù)注冊(cè)協(xié)議約定產(chǎn)生。作為整個(gè)交易模式中確定各方交易主體權(quán)利義務(wù)的核心法律文件,P2P網(wǎng)貸交易用戶(hù)注冊(cè)協(xié)議涉及的法律問(wèn)題較為集中。本文通過(guò)對(duì)這些問(wèn)題的全面分析,能夠在詳細(xì)了解P2P網(wǎng)貸交易流程的基礎(chǔ)上,全面梳理出相關(guān)法律框架及存在的主要法律問(wèn)題。同時(shí),從P2P平臺(tái)運(yùn)營(yíng)公司的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)控制、從用戶(hù)注冊(cè)協(xié)議優(yōu)化、從行業(yè)監(jiān)管、從制度完善幾個(gè)方面分別提出一些建議。本文分為五個(gè)部分展開(kāi)探討:第一部分主要介紹了P2P網(wǎng)貸交易的概念、國(guó)內(nèi)主要交易模式與對(duì)應(yīng)的代表平臺(tái),并對(duì)國(guó)內(nèi)主要交易模式下涉及的基本法律關(guān)系進(jìn)行了分析,并得出:傳統(tǒng)借貸方式與P2P借貸方式二者的變化不僅僅表現(xiàn)在形式上由“線(xiàn)下”到“線(xiàn)上”,更重要的應(yīng)是形式變化導(dǎo)致法律關(guān)系建立的交易邏輯的變化。此外,對(duì)于國(guó)內(nèi)不同交易模式下的法律關(guān)系也以簡(jiǎn)圖形式進(jìn)行了總結(jié),且從簡(jiǎn)圖中能夠清晰地發(fā)現(xiàn)各平臺(tái)運(yùn)營(yíng)公司由于對(duì)法律的理解與運(yùn)用不同,而導(dǎo)致法律關(guān)系結(jié)構(gòu)設(shè)計(jì)的不同。第二部分通過(guò)對(duì)用戶(hù)注冊(cè)協(xié)議進(jìn)行概念化分析,闡釋了用戶(hù)注冊(cè)協(xié)議的含義。然后分析了用戶(hù)注冊(cè)協(xié)議的兩種法律屬性:電子格式合同與居間合同。最后,通過(guò)對(duì)類(lèi)似案列地簡(jiǎn)要分析,發(fā)現(xiàn)用戶(hù)注冊(cè)協(xié)議作為P2P網(wǎng)貸交易模式的核心法律文件,其在實(shí)踐中具有重要意義。第三部分主要對(duì)用戶(hù)注冊(cè)協(xié)議主體進(jìn)行全面分析。就P2P網(wǎng)絡(luò)運(yùn)營(yíng)商而言,主要分析了其資質(zhì)準(zhǔn)入、平臺(tái)擔(dān)保、規(guī)范運(yùn)營(yíng)等問(wèn)題;就用戶(hù)而言,主要分析了用戶(hù)資格、投資者保護(hù)等問(wèn)題。通過(guò)對(duì)上述問(wèn)題的分析,發(fā)現(xiàn)平臺(tái)運(yùn)營(yíng)商應(yīng)控制的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)點(diǎn),以及提出一些對(duì)應(yīng)的優(yōu)化建議。第四部分對(duì)用戶(hù)注冊(cè)協(xié)議條款進(jìn)行分析。首先,總結(jié)出用戶(hù)注冊(cè)協(xié)議條款的四種類(lèi)型,分別闡釋了四種條款類(lèi)型的含義,并進(jìn)行列舉式說(shuō)明;其次,從用戶(hù)注冊(cè)協(xié)議條款具體內(nèi)容方面,重點(diǎn)分析了免責(zé)條款與隱私保護(hù)條款。就免責(zé)條款而言,總結(jié)出網(wǎng)絡(luò)運(yùn)營(yíng)商關(guān)注的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)點(diǎn),同時(shí)提出在控制法律風(fēng)險(xiǎn)過(guò)程中應(yīng)注意的問(wèn)題;就隱私保護(hù)條款而言,分析了投融資雙方在隱私保護(hù)問(wèn)題上存在的矛盾及信息披露的必要性,并通過(guò)明確的信息披露條件化解前述矛盾。最后,在條款類(lèi)型化、特定條款內(nèi)容分析的基礎(chǔ)上,利用統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)方法對(duì)權(quán)利性條款與義務(wù)性條款進(jìn)行分析,判斷出用戶(hù)注冊(cè)協(xié)議形式上的平衡性,并分析了產(chǎn)生這種不平衡的原因,提出網(wǎng)絡(luò)運(yùn)營(yíng)商為防止格式合同無(wú)效而應(yīng)把握的應(yīng)對(duì)原則。第五部分主要根據(jù)前述分析從用戶(hù)注冊(cè)協(xié)議本身的完善、法律制度的完善以及監(jiān)管的完善三個(gè)角度提出相關(guān)建議。
[Abstract]:P2P net loan transaction as an innovative product of the fusion of traditional lending transactions and Internet technology, the basic legal relationship lending and borrowing the same. But because of the traditional transfer transaction form from "line" to "line", the lending transaction by the logic of "acquaintance set" to "open trade". The change of transaction logic the result of our current law does not require a lot of problems, and needs to be solved. In order to meet the provisions of the existing legal framework, to avoid the "illegal" and "touch the red line, many domestic P2P platform operators of foreign mature P2P net loan transaction mode were improved in different degrees. The domestic appeared four basic trade patterns:" pure credit line "mode," online secured "mode," the main line, the line auxiliary "mode," online supplement, line oriented "mode. Through the analysis of the four models found that no matter what kind of model are related to the P2P platform operators and users of legal relationship problems. The legal relationship is provided by the P2P platform operating company of electronic contract: user registration agreement. As a legal document to determine the core subject of rights and obligations of the parties trading for the entire transaction mode, the legal problems of P2P net loan transaction user registration protocol involved is relatively concentrated. Through a comprehensive analysis of these problems, can be based on a detailed understanding of P2P net loan transaction process, sort out the comprehensive legal framework and legal problems. At the same time, the risk control from the P2P platform operating company the registration protocol optimization from the user, from the industry regulation, and puts forward some suggestions to perfect the system from several aspects. This paper is divided into five parts: the first study Part mainly introduces the concept of P2P net loan transaction platform, on behalf of the main transaction mode and the corresponding domestic, basic legal relationship and relates to the domestic main transaction mode is analyzed, and that changes in traditional lending and borrowing P2P two not only in the form of "line" to "line" it is more important to form changes in transaction logic create legal relations. In addition, the legal relationship between different domestic trading patterns are summarized in schematic form, and from the diagram can clearly find the platform operators because understanding and application of the law, resulting in different legal relations the structure of the design. The second part of the user registration protocol for conceptual analysis, explains the meaning of user registration protocol. Then analyzed two kinds of legal user registration protocol : the electronic contract and the contract. Finally, through briefly analysis of similar case, found the user registration protocol as the core legal documents P2P net loan transaction model, has important significance in practice. The third part of the main body of the user registration protocol were analyzed. The P2P network operators, the main analysis the admittance, platform security, standard operation; users, mainly analyzes the user qualification, investor protection and other issues. Through the analysis of the above problems, found that the platform operators should control the risk, and puts forward some corresponding optimization suggestions. The fourth part of the registration agreement on the terms were analyzed firstly., summed up the four types of user registration provisions of the agreement, the four clause types explain the meaning, and the list of instructions; secondly, from the specific terms in the user registration protocol Volume, focus on the analysis of the exemption clause and privacy protection clause. On the disclaimer, summarizes the network operators focus on risk, and puts forward the legal risk control should be paid attention to in the process of the problem; privacy protection provisions, analyzes the necessity of contradiction and information disclosure of both investment and financing problems existing in privacy protection, and through the clear information disclosure conditions to resolve the contradictions. Finally, in terms of the type, analyzing the specific provisions on the content of rights and obligations of clause clauses were analyzed by using statistical method, determine the balance of the user registration agreement form, and analyzes the reasons for this don't balance, to puts forward the principles of network operators should grasp in order to prevent the format of the contract invalid. The fifth part is mainly based on the above analysis from the user registration protocol is perfect, legal system Suggestions are put forward in three aspects of perfection and perfection of supervision.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D923.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張雪is;;P2P網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸相關(guān)法律問(wèn)題研究[J];法律適用;2014年08期

2 馮果;蔣莎莎;;論我國(guó)P2P網(wǎng)絡(luò)貸款平臺(tái)的異化及其監(jiān)管[J];法商研究;2013年05期

3 茅建中;;商業(yè)性P2P網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)與法律規(guī)制[J];人民司法;2013年17期

4 陳道富;朱鴻鳴;;我國(guó)P2P行業(yè)發(fā)展的現(xiàn)狀、問(wèn)題及政策建議[J];重慶理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué));2013年04期

5 李?lèi)?ài)君;;民間借貸網(wǎng)絡(luò)平臺(tái)的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)防范法律制度研究[J];中國(guó)政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2012年05期

6 林旭霞;;論網(wǎng)絡(luò)運(yùn)營(yíng)商與用戶(hù)之間協(xié)議的法律規(guī)制[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2012年05期

7 莫易嫻;;P2P網(wǎng)絡(luò)借貸國(guó)內(nèi)外理論與實(shí)踐研究文獻(xiàn)綜述[J];金融理論與實(shí)踐;2011年12期

8 黃建華;趙長(zhǎng)亮;;電子合同的法律效力問(wèn)題及對(duì)策研究[J];電子科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2009年S1期

9 高晉康;;民間金融法制化的界限與路徑選擇[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2008年04期

10 劉穎,駱文怡;論點(diǎn)擊合同[J];武漢大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：1497169