發(fā)布時間：2018-02-09 01:39

  本文關鍵詞： 網(wǎng)絡道德譴責 輿論表達 隱私侵權 隱私保護　出處：《南京大學》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：隨著互聯(lián)網(wǎng)對社會生活的全面介入,"道德譴責"也從現(xiàn)實環(huán)境延伸到了網(wǎng)絡空間,借助于互聯(lián)網(wǎng)所獨有的信息傳播及交互方式,譴責性言論的表達變得更為便利和迅速,所發(fā)揮的輿論效應也更為持久和深遠。但同時,網(wǎng)絡"道德譴責"也因互聯(lián)網(wǎng)所存在著的匿名、自由、虛擬的特點呈現(xiàn)出了大量的負面形態(tài),其中尤為凸出的,就是大量的個人隱私在其中所遭受到的非法收集和泄露,以及由此而引發(fā)的對隱私主體的一系列傷害。而另一方面,在互聯(lián)網(wǎng)的沖擊下,隱私本身又出現(xiàn)了一些新的變化,不僅包含的內(nèi)容范圍進一步擴大,也因其數(shù)據(jù)化的呈現(xiàn)方式而變得更易被竊取和擴散。在這種情況下,網(wǎng)民們往往沒有意識到自己的某些爆料、轉(zhuǎn)載等行為其實已經(jīng)跨越了法律的界限,構成了對他人隱私權的侵權。鑒于"道德譴責"在維護社會秩序方面所具有的獨特效應,以及保護個人隱私不被非法侵害的重要價值,有必要對網(wǎng)絡"道德譴責"中涉及隱私事項的輿論表達予以規(guī)范和設限,以規(guī)避可能發(fā)生的侵害他人隱私權的行為。因此,本文將主要以隱私保護為切入點,來重新審視網(wǎng)絡"道德譴責"輿論表達的合理合法性,希望能在明確輿論發(fā)聲邊界的基礎上實現(xiàn)對公民隱私權的保護,進而助力"道德譴責"積極效應的更大發(fā)揮。除了緒論和結語,本文主要分為四個部分:第一部分,是對"道德譴責"的基本梳理和理論概述。主要包括概念界定、互聯(lián)網(wǎng)環(huán)境下的效應強化以及實際運行狀況,在點明現(xiàn)實存在的異化形態(tài)之后,對其法理基礎、法律保障和限制進行分析;第二部分,明確互聯(lián)網(wǎng)環(huán)境下隱私自身出現(xiàn)的變化,結合實際案例對網(wǎng)絡"道德譴責"輿論中的突出內(nèi)容予以歸納和分析,有針對性地探討這些輿論內(nèi)容與法律隱私之間的相關性;第三部分,則主要以隱私權為切入點,從隱私侵權行為的法律構成要件來具體分析網(wǎng)絡"道德譴責"輿論表達中涉及到的隱私侵權行為,并兼及對當前較有爭議的"被遺忘權"和"公共場所隱私權"的討論;第四部分,正視問題以期找到協(xié)調(diào)之道。具體分析網(wǎng)絡"道德譴責"輿論涉及隱私事項的不同情況,運用價值衡量與利益最大化的辯證思維,在輿論表達與隱私保護之間做出取舍,結合實際情況區(qū)別設定不同的隱私保護規(guī)則,為網(wǎng)絡"道德譴責"劃定合理合法的范圍邊界,以期實現(xiàn)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)環(huán)境下"道德譴責"輿論表達與隱私保護之間的協(xié)調(diào)與平衡。
[Abstract]:With the full involvement of the Internet in social life, "moral condemnation" extends from the real environment to cyberspace. With the help of the unique way of information dissemination and interaction on the Internet, the expression of reprimand speech becomes more convenient and rapid. But at the same time, due to the anonymity, freedom and fictitious features of the Internet, Internet "moral condemnation" has shown a large number of negative forms, especially highlighted. That is, the illegal collection and disclosure of a large number of personal privacy, and a series of injuries to the privacy subject arising therefrom. On the other hand, under the impact of the Internet, there have been some new changes in privacy itself. Not only has the content been further expanded, but it has also become more vulnerable to theft and diffusion because of the way it is presented. In this case, netizens are often unaware of some of their own revelations. Such acts as reprinting have actually crossed the legal line and constitute an infringement of the right to privacy of others... Given the unique effect of "moral condemnation" in maintaining social order and the important value of protecting individuals from unlawful violations of their privacy, It is necessary to regulate and restrict the expression of public opinion concerning privacy matters in the network "moral condemnation" in order to avoid the possible behavior of infringing upon the privacy of others. Therefore, this paper will mainly take privacy protection as the starting point. To re-examine the reasonableness and legitimacy of the public opinion expression of "moral condemnation" on the Internet, and hope that the protection of citizens' right to privacy can be realized on the basis of clear boundaries of public opinion's voice. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this paper is mainly divided into four parts: the first part is the basic combing and theoretical overview of "moral condemnation", mainly including the definition of the concept. After pointing out the dissimilation form of the reality, the author analyzes its legal basis, legal protection and limitation. The second part is to clarify the changes of privacy itself in the Internet environment. Combined with practical cases, the paper summarizes and analyzes the prominent contents of public opinion of "moral condemnation" on the Internet, and probes into the correlation between these public opinion contents and legal privacy. The third part mainly focuses on the right to privacy as the starting point. From the legal constitution of privacy tort, this paper concretely analyzes the privacy tort involved in the public opinion expression of "moral condemnation" on the Internet, and also discusses the controversial "right to be forgotten" and "right to privacy in public places". Part 4th, face up to the problem in order to find a way to coordinate. The concrete analysis of the network "moral condemnation" public opinion involved in privacy matters, using the dialectical thinking of value measurement and profit maximization. Making a trade-off between public opinion expression and privacy protection, setting different rules of privacy protection according to the actual situation, and delineating a reasonable and legitimate boundary of scope for "moral condemnation" on the Internet. In order to achieve the Internet environment "moral condemnation" public opinion expression and privacy protection coordination and balance.
【學位授予單位】：南京大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D923;G206
，

本文編號：1496771