本文關(guān)鍵詞： 網(wǎng)絡(luò)道德譴責(zé) 輿論表達(dá) 隱私侵權(quán) 隱私保護(hù)　出處：《南京大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：隨著互聯(lián)網(wǎng)對(duì)社會(huì)生活的全面介入,"道德譴責(zé)"也從現(xiàn)實(shí)環(huán)境延伸到了網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間,借助于互聯(lián)網(wǎng)所獨(dú)有的信息傳播及交互方式,譴責(zé)性言論的表達(dá)變得更為便利和迅速,所發(fā)揮的輿論效應(yīng)也更為持久和深遠(yuǎn)。但同時(shí),網(wǎng)絡(luò)"道德譴責(zé)"也因互聯(lián)網(wǎng)所存在著的匿名、自由、虛擬的特點(diǎn)呈現(xiàn)出了大量的負(fù)面形態(tài),其中尤為凸出的,就是大量的個(gè)人隱私在其中所遭受到的非法收集和泄露,以及由此而引發(fā)的對(duì)隱私主體的一系列傷害。而另一方面,在互聯(lián)網(wǎng)的沖擊下,隱私本身又出現(xiàn)了一些新的變化,不僅包含的內(nèi)容范圍進(jìn)一步擴(kuò)大,也因其數(shù)據(jù)化的呈現(xiàn)方式而變得更易被竊取和擴(kuò)散。在這種情況下,網(wǎng)民們往往沒有意識(shí)到自己的某些爆料、轉(zhuǎn)載等行為其實(shí)已經(jīng)跨越了法律的界限,構(gòu)成了對(duì)他人隱私權(quán)的侵權(quán)。鑒于"道德譴責(zé)"在維護(hù)社會(huì)秩序方面所具有的獨(dú)特效應(yīng),以及保護(hù)個(gè)人隱私不被非法侵害的重要價(jià)值,有必要對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)"道德譴責(zé)"中涉及隱私事項(xiàng)的輿論表達(dá)予以規(guī)范和設(shè)限,以規(guī)避可能發(fā)生的侵害他人隱私權(quán)的行為。因此,本文將主要以隱私保護(hù)為切入點(diǎn),來重新審視網(wǎng)絡(luò)"道德譴責(zé)"輿論表達(dá)的合理合法性,希望能在明確輿論發(fā)聲邊界的基礎(chǔ)上實(shí)現(xiàn)對(duì)公民隱私權(quán)的保護(hù),進(jìn)而助力"道德譴責(zé)"積極效應(yīng)的更大發(fā)揮。除了緒論和結(jié)語,本文主要分為四個(gè)部分:第一部分,是對(duì)"道德譴責(zé)"的基本梳理和理論概述。主要包括概念界定、互聯(lián)網(wǎng)環(huán)境下的效應(yīng)強(qiáng)化以及實(shí)際運(yùn)行狀況,在點(diǎn)明現(xiàn)實(shí)存在的異化形態(tài)之后,對(duì)其法理基礎(chǔ)、法律保障和限制進(jìn)行分析;第二部分,明確互聯(lián)網(wǎng)環(huán)境下隱私自身出現(xiàn)的變化,結(jié)合實(shí)際案例對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)"道德譴責(zé)"輿論中的突出內(nèi)容予以歸納和分析,有針對(duì)性地探討這些輿論內(nèi)容與法律隱私之間的相關(guān)性;第三部分,則主要以隱私權(quán)為切入點(diǎn),從隱私侵權(quán)行為的法律構(gòu)成要件來具體分析網(wǎng)絡(luò)"道德譴責(zé)"輿論表達(dá)中涉及到的隱私侵權(quán)行為,并兼及對(duì)當(dāng)前較有爭(zhēng)議的"被遺忘權(quán)"和"公共場(chǎng)所隱私權(quán)"的討論;第四部分,正視問題以期找到協(xié)調(diào)之道。具體分析網(wǎng)絡(luò)"道德譴責(zé)"輿論涉及隱私事項(xiàng)的不同情況,運(yùn)用價(jià)值衡量與利益最大化的辯證思維,在輿論表達(dá)與隱私保護(hù)之間做出取舍,結(jié)合實(shí)際情況區(qū)別設(shè)定不同的隱私保護(hù)規(guī)則,為網(wǎng)絡(luò)"道德譴責(zé)"劃定合理合法的范圍邊界,以期實(shí)現(xiàn)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)環(huán)境下"道德譴責(zé)"輿論表達(dá)與隱私保護(hù)之間的協(xié)調(diào)與平衡。
[Abstract]:With the full involvement of the Internet in social life, "moral condemnation" extends from the real environment to cyberspace. With the help of the unique way of information dissemination and interaction on the Internet, the expression of reprimand speech becomes more convenient and rapid. But at the same time, due to the anonymity, freedom and fictitious features of the Internet, Internet "moral condemnation" has shown a large number of negative forms, especially highlighted. That is, the illegal collection and disclosure of a large number of personal privacy, and a series of injuries to the privacy subject arising therefrom. On the other hand, under the impact of the Internet, there have been some new changes in privacy itself. Not only has the content been further expanded, but it has also become more vulnerable to theft and diffusion because of the way it is presented. In this case, netizens are often unaware of some of their own revelations. Such acts as reprinting have actually crossed the legal line and constitute an infringement of the right to privacy of others... Given the unique effect of "moral condemnation" in maintaining social order and the important value of protecting individuals from unlawful violations of their privacy, It is necessary to regulate and restrict the expression of public opinion concerning privacy matters in the network "moral condemnation" in order to avoid the possible behavior of infringing upon the privacy of others. Therefore, this paper will mainly take privacy protection as the starting point. To re-examine the reasonableness and legitimacy of the public opinion expression of "moral condemnation" on the Internet, and hope that the protection of citizens' right to privacy can be realized on the basis of clear boundaries of public opinion's voice. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this paper is mainly divided into four parts: the first part is the basic combing and theoretical overview of "moral condemnation", mainly including the definition of the concept. After pointing out the dissimilation form of the reality, the author analyzes its legal basis, legal protection and limitation. The second part is to clarify the changes of privacy itself in the Internet environment. Combined with practical cases, the paper summarizes and analyzes the prominent contents of public opinion of "moral condemnation" on the Internet, and probes into the correlation between these public opinion contents and legal privacy. The third part mainly focuses on the right to privacy as the starting point. From the legal constitution of privacy tort, this paper concretely analyzes the privacy tort involved in the public opinion expression of "moral condemnation" on the Internet, and also discusses the controversial "right to be forgotten" and "right to privacy in public places". Part 4th, face up to the problem in order to find a way to coordinate. The concrete analysis of the network "moral condemnation" public opinion involved in privacy matters, using the dialectical thinking of value measurement and profit maximization. Making a trade-off between public opinion expression and privacy protection, setting different rules of privacy protection according to the actual situation, and delineating a reasonable and legitimate boundary of scope for "moral condemnation" on the Internet. In order to achieve the Internet environment "moral condemnation" public opinion expression and privacy protection coordination and balance.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D923;G206
，

本文編號(hào)：1496771