本文關(guān)鍵詞： 商標(biāo)權(quán) 商號權(quán) 沖突 司法化解　出處：《南京師范大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：商標(biāo)權(quán)與商號權(quán)的沖突可謂由來已久,但迄今為止,關(guān)于商標(biāo)權(quán)與商號權(quán)沖突的司法化解仍然觀點紛呈。究其原因既有對商標(biāo)權(quán)與商號權(quán)本質(zhì)屬性認(rèn)識的差異,亦有對商標(biāo)權(quán)與商號權(quán)沖突的形式與實質(zhì)及其后果所持觀點與看法的不同。商標(biāo)權(quán)與商號權(quán)沖突的表現(xiàn)形式、形成原因多種多樣,針對不同表現(xiàn)形式、不同形成原因的權(quán)利沖突,其司法化解的方法各有不同。為此,有必要對兩種權(quán)利沖突的樣態(tài)、形成原因等進(jìn)行細(xì)化梳理,從而有針對性地遵循原則、選擇方法,最終做出恰當(dāng)?shù)乃痉ú门小１疚幕谏鲜瞿康?除引言和結(jié)語外共分成四個部分對相關(guān)問題分別進(jìn)行了探討。第一部分主要從商標(biāo)與商號注冊與否、相應(yīng)的知名度如何、是否存在歷史原因、以及當(dāng)事人是否存在侵犯他人在先權(quán)利的主觀意愿等方面對商標(biāo)權(quán)與商號權(quán)的沖突樣態(tài)進(jìn)行了梳理；第二部分主要從商標(biāo)與商號的內(nèi)在屬性、市場影響、行政管理、經(jīng)營者的誠信現(xiàn)狀等方面分析了商標(biāo)權(quán)與商號權(quán)沖突的形成原因,進(jìn)而對兩種權(quán)利沖突時的危害以及采用司法手段予以化解的必要性進(jìn)行了闡述：第三部分主要對商標(biāo)權(quán)與商號權(quán)沖突的司法化解過程中,司法權(quán)所應(yīng)遵循的訴訟程序性原則與實體裁判性原則進(jìn)行了探討,以期通過一定的程序性原則與實體性原則的規(guī)制,為公平公正的司法裁判打下堅實基礎(chǔ)；第四部分圍繞不同的商標(biāo)權(quán)與商號權(quán)沖突樣態(tài),對相應(yīng)的裁判思路、裁決方法等進(jìn)行了探討,同時對司法裁判中重點涉及的責(zé)任承擔(dān)問題以及個別案件中可能涉及的勸導(dǎo)性用語的使用問題進(jìn)行了論述。
[Abstract]:The conflict between trademark right and trade name right has a long history, but up to now, there are still different views on the judicial solution of the conflict between trademark right and trade name right, which is due to the difference in understanding the essential attribute of trademark right and trade name right. There are also different views and views on the form and substance of the conflict between trademark right and trade name right and their consequences. The forms of expression of the conflict between trademark right and trade name right are various, aiming at different forms of expression. Different causes of the conflict of rights, their different ways of judicial resolution. Therefore, it is necessary to the two kinds of rights conflict of the appearance, formation of the reasons for detailed combing, so as to follow the principle. Based on the above purpose, this paper divides four parts into four parts to discuss the related issues. The first part is mainly from the trademark and trade name registration or not. The corresponding popularity, whether there are historical reasons, as well as whether the parties have the subjective will to infringe the rights of others in the first place, and so on to sort out the conflict between trademark rights and trade name rights. The second part mainly analyzes the causes of the conflict between trademark and trade name from the internal attributes of trademark and trade name, market influence, administrative management, the status quo of business integrity and so on. Then the harm of the two conflicts of rights and the necessity of resolving them by judicial means are expounded. The third part mainly focuses on the judicial process of resolving the conflicts between trademark rights and trademark rights. The procedural principles and substantive principles of judicial power are discussed in order to lay a solid foundation for a fair and just judicial decision through the regulation of certain procedural principles and substantive principles. Part 4th focuses on the conflict between trademark rights and trademark rights, and discusses the corresponding ideas and methods of adjudication. At the same time, the author discusses the responsibility assumption and the use of persuasive language in individual cases.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D923.43

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 張雪;論商標(biāo)權(quán)與商號權(quán)的沖突及其解決[D];中國政法大學(xué);2009年

2 陳浩;商業(yè)標(biāo)識統(tǒng)一立法初探[D];四川大學(xué);2004年

，

本文編號：1493225