本文關(guān)鍵詞： 藥品侵權(quán) 因果關(guān)系 推定因果關(guān)系　出處：《東南大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：近幾年來,人民法院受理的藥品侵權(quán)訴訟案件逐漸增多。由于藥品固有的危險(xiǎn),使得藥品區(qū)別與其它的一些產(chǎn)品。藥品致害機(jī)理復(fù)雜,具有時(shí)間的消長(zhǎng)性,致病因素的復(fù)雜性,舉證的專業(yè)技術(shù)性。這些都是藥品侵權(quán)案件中因果關(guān)系的認(rèn)定困難的原因。因此,各國(guó)發(fā)展了許多特殊的證明方法,為受害者尋求救濟(jì)途徑提供了可能性。目前,在立法上,我國(guó)還沒有制定專門的《藥品責(zé)任法》來保護(hù)藥品侵權(quán)的受害者。在司法上,由于藥品侵權(quán)舉證責(zé)任分配的困難,受害者往往承擔(dān)敗訴的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。并且,由于因果關(guān)系的證明標(biāo)準(zhǔn)不統(tǒng)一,各地法院同案不同判的情況也時(shí)常發(fā)生。為了維護(hù)受害者的合法權(quán)益,維護(hù)公平正義,本文對(duì)完善藥品侵權(quán)中的因果關(guān)系認(rèn)定提出了思考。本文從案例中引出藥品侵權(quán)訴訟中因果關(guān)系的特殊性,并分析了其他國(guó)家的因果關(guān)系認(rèn)定的經(jīng)驗(yàn)。在立法上提出了制定專門的《藥品責(zé)任法》的建議,在司法上提出了舉證責(zé)任倒置規(guī)則的想法,最后本文還借鑒國(guó)外的因果關(guān)系認(rèn)定理論分析我國(guó)藥品侵權(quán)訴訟案件的不足,以更好的保護(hù)我國(guó)藥品侵權(quán)訴訟中的受害者。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the people's court has gradually increased the number of cases of drug infringement litigation. Because of the inherent dangers of drugs, the difference between drugs and some other products. The mechanism of drug harm is complex, with the time of growth and decline. The complexity of pathogenic factors and the professional technology of proof are all the reasons for the difficulty of identifying causality in drug infringement cases. Therefore, many countries have developed many special methods of proof. At present, our country has not formulated a special Drug liability Law to protect the victims of drug infringement. Because of the difficulty of distributing the burden of proof in drug infringement, the victim often bears the risk of losing the lawsuit. Moreover, the standard of proof of causality is not uniform. In order to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the victims and to safeguard the fairness and justice, the different judgments of the local courts also occur from time to time. This paper puts forward some thoughts on how to perfect the causality in drug infringement. This paper leads to the particularity of causality in drug tort litigation. It also analyzes the experience of causality in other countries. In legislation, the author puts forward the suggestion of making a special "Drug liability Law", and puts forward the idea of putting forward the rule of reversing the burden of proof in judicature. Finally, this paper also uses the theory of causality in foreign countries to analyze the shortcomings of drug tort litigation cases in China, in order to better protect the victims of drug infringement litigation in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：東南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D923

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 郭彩;;證券侵權(quán)責(zé)任因果關(guān)系認(rèn)定的再認(rèn)識(shí)——兼論因果關(guān)系推定理論的適用[J];法制與社會(huì);2011年03期

2 劉春寶;李靜;;瀆職犯罪案件中因果關(guān)系認(rèn)定問題[J];黨史博采(理論);2011年03期

3 杜曉溪;高崇慧;;侵權(quán)法因果關(guān)系認(rèn)定規(guī)則研究[J];湖北經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年02期

4 陳丹;王彬;;瑕疵建筑物因外力致人損害的因果關(guān)系認(rèn)定[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究導(dǎo)刊;2009年03期

5 張雅潔;;過失侵權(quán)的因果關(guān)系認(rèn)定[J];南方論刊;2010年02期

6 崔軍勇,李洪軍;對(duì)侵犯生命健康權(quán)案件中因果關(guān)系認(rèn)定之分析[J];延邊黨校學(xué)報(bào);2004年03期

7 楊秀朝;構(gòu)建我國(guó)因果關(guān)系認(rèn)定模式之探討[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)與社會(huì)發(fā)展;2003年02期

8 劉燕;梁p煵，

本文編號(hào)：1462173