本文關(guān)鍵詞： 網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商 著作權(quán)保護(hù) 侵權(quán)責(zé)任　出處：《首都經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商是網(wǎng)絡(luò)信息傳輸?shù)闹行?是網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間傳播和利用享有著作權(quán)作品的重要平臺。在網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)日益革新的環(huán)境下,著作權(quán)領(lǐng)域中尤其是復(fù)制權(quán)和信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)的保護(hù)面臨著重重問題。因此,在現(xiàn)有的“互聯(lián)網(wǎng)+”時代背景中,針對網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)保護(hù)薄弱的問題,我們有必要對現(xiàn)有著作權(quán)法律制度進(jìn)行調(diào)整,既要保護(hù)著作權(quán)人的應(yīng)有權(quán)利不受侵犯,也要維護(hù)網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商的產(chǎn)業(yè)利益不受阻礙,以此達(dá)到科技與權(quán)益在新時代背景下的平衡發(fā)展。本文運(yùn)用案例分析和比較分析的方法,對網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商著作權(quán)侵權(quán)問題進(jìn)行了詳細(xì)地探討。從實(shí)務(wù)角度出發(fā),從相關(guān)網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商著作權(quán)侵權(quán)案例為著手,重點(diǎn)分析了網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商的侵權(quán)責(zé)任要件構(gòu)成;從理論層面出發(fā),在與我國法律體系與美國避風(fēng)港原則對比的基礎(chǔ)上,提出了關(guān)于如何完善對我國著作權(quán)侵權(quán)責(zé)任認(rèn)定問題的建議。第一部分,簡要陳述網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商著作權(quán)侵權(quán)問題,包括網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商的概念和作用等,對網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商著作權(quán)侵權(quán)問題的成因及現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行分析,奠定對本論從理論與實(shí)務(wù)方面進(jìn)一步深入探討與研究的背景基礎(chǔ)。第二部分,針對網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商著作權(quán)侵權(quán)行為以及該種行為如何認(rèn)定展開研討,通過分析網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商著作權(quán)侵權(quán)行為的表現(xiàn)形式并結(jié)合案例評析對相關(guān)問題進(jìn)行研究,進(jìn)而對于網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商著作權(quán)侵權(quán)行為的界定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)給出相應(yīng)的觀點(diǎn)。第三部分,通過對我國現(xiàn)行法律法規(guī)關(guān)于網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)侵權(quán)責(zé)任的一般形式規(guī)定進(jìn)行比較分析,研究提出在新技術(shù)條件下,網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商在著作權(quán)侵權(quán)承擔(dān)的形式,以及其責(zé)任認(rèn)定,包括賠償標(biāo)準(zhǔn)以及免責(zé)情形等方面的特殊性。第四部分,通過上述三部分的理論與實(shí)務(wù)的闡述,針對目前司法實(shí)踐中存在的歸責(zé)不明等問題提出具有操作性的立法建議和司法建議。
[Abstract]:Network service provider is the center of network information transmission and an important platform for the dissemination and utilization of copyright works in cyberspace. In the field of copyright, especially the protection of the right to copy and the right to spread information on the network is facing many problems. Therefore, in the background of the present "Internet" era, the protection of network copyright is weak. It is necessary for us to adjust the existing legal system of copyright, not only to protect the rights of copyright owners from infringement, but also to protect the industrial interests of network service providers without hindrance. In order to achieve a balanced development of science and technology and rights and interests in the new era. This paper uses the method of case analysis and comparative analysis to discuss the copyright infringement of network service providers in detail. From the perspective of practice. Starting from the case of copyright infringement of network service provider, the paper analyzes the constitution of tort liability of network service provider. From the theoretical level, on the basis of the comparison with the legal system of our country and the principle of safe haven in the United States, the author puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the cognizance of copyright tort liability in our country. This paper briefly describes the copyright infringement of network service providers, including the concept and role of network service providers, and analyzes the causes and current situation of copyright infringement problems of network service providers. The second part is about copyright infringement of network service providers and how to identify this kind of behavior. Through the analysis of network service providers copyright infringement forms and combined with the case study of related issues. The third part, through the current laws and regulations of our country on the network copyright infringement liability of the general form of provisions for comparative analysis. Under the new technology condition, the paper puts forward the form of network service provider's copyright infringement, and the particularity of its liability, including the standard of compensation and the circumstances of exemption. Part 4th. Through the theoretical and practical exposition of the above three parts, the author puts forward some operable legislative and judicial suggestions in view of the problems of unclear imputation in the current judicial practice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：首都經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D923.41

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 ;替罪羔羊?網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商應(yīng)否替人受過?[J];電子計(jì)算機(jī)與外部設(shè)備;2000年08期

2 郭建;;“人肉搜索”與網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商責(zé)任[J];四川警察學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年06期

3 李德成;網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商責(zé)任的法哲學(xué)思考[J];科技與法律;2002年03期

4 李麗華,呂巧珍;網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商在經(jīng)營中應(yīng)注意的若干法律問題[J];信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全;2002年10期

5 周維德,朱小霞;網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商的鏈接責(zé)任歸責(zé)研究[J];政法論叢;2002年05期

6 孫建軍,馬越;論網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商的著作權(quán)責(zé)任[J];國際貿(mào)易問題;2002年04期

7 彭文華;網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商之刑事責(zé)任探討[J];佛山科學(xué)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2004年03期

8 喬生;論網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商的侵權(quán)責(zé)任[J];西南民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社科版);2004年06期

9 馬洪波;網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商侵權(quán)責(zé)任芻議[J];無錫商業(yè)職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年03期

10 楊秀菊;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商法律監(jiān)管研究[J];山西財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2007年S2期

相關(guān)會議論文 前4條

1 劉遠(yuǎn)山;李波;;論我國著作權(quán)侵權(quán)的認(rèn)定和制裁[A];當(dāng)代法學(xué)論壇（2007年第3輯）[C];2007年

2 劉s，

本文編號：1455260