本文關(guān)鍵詞：關(guān)于代孕的法律問題探討　出處：《蘭州大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 代孕 人工生殖 合法化 完全代孕 立法構(gòu)想

【摘要】：代孕屬于人工輔助生殖技術(shù)的一種,其最早出現(xiàn)于美國,伴隨著生物醫(yī)學(xué)技術(shù)的發(fā)展而迅速發(fā)展起來。在不孕率居高不下的今天,代孕成為了一種較為簡(jiǎn)易可行的替代方法。代孕技術(shù)和其他高新科學(xué)技術(shù)一樣,利弊共存,因其在世界范圍內(nèi)的廣泛應(yīng)用,引起了一系列的法律、倫理以及醫(yī)學(xué)方面的問題,產(chǎn)生了較大的爭(zhēng)議。而對(duì)于實(shí)施代孕的目的、對(duì)象和適用的范圍,世界上并沒有統(tǒng)一的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。代孕所引起的問題對(duì)傳統(tǒng)的民法理論提出了強(qiáng)烈的挑戰(zhàn),對(duì)此,世界各國紛紛采取一定的應(yīng)對(duì)措施。目前我國并沒有一部專門性的法律來予以規(guī)范,對(duì)于代孕的規(guī)定主要集中于由衛(wèi)生部所頒布的行政規(guī)章之中。本文基于對(duì)代孕所引發(fā)的法律道德等問題進(jìn)行討論和剖析的角度,采用比較研究、案例分析等方法對(duì)代孕的合法性進(jìn)行論證,從而認(rèn)識(shí)到,采取一味禁止的方法來杜絕代孕,并不能從根源上解決問題,而應(yīng)當(dāng)找尋更加合理的方法。鑒于此,大膽提出了在我國進(jìn)行代孕立法的構(gòu)想,以期從法律的視角來推動(dòng)代孕向著成熟化、完善化的方向發(fā)展。文章總共分為以下幾個(gè)部分：第一部分為引言部分,包括研究背景、研究?jī)?nèi)容、研究方法、研究意義四個(gè)方面。第二部分為代孕的概說,在界定代孕概念的基礎(chǔ)上對(duì)其進(jìn)行分類,并對(duì)我國代孕現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行論述。第三部分主要關(guān)于國內(nèi)外代孕立法現(xiàn)狀分析,從國外和國內(nèi)兩個(gè)維度出發(fā),介紹了代孕的立法現(xiàn)狀,并總結(jié)國外立法現(xiàn)狀對(duì)我國的啟示。第四部分對(duì)代孕行為的合法性分析,從倫理和法律的角度來論證代孕的合法性,通過對(duì)代孕涉及的倫理道德和生育權(quán)、身體權(quán)等法律基礎(chǔ)問題闡述,分析現(xiàn)存的各種矛盾和沖突,為代孕合法化奠定基石；第五部分關(guān)于代孕合理存在的價(jià)值分析,從多個(gè)角度出發(fā)來論證代孕合理存在的必要性。第六部分代孕合法化的類型及其調(diào)控,對(duì)代孕的不同類型進(jìn)行區(qū)分后,針對(duì)不同類型,依據(jù)原則進(jìn)行調(diào)控。第七部分主要是對(duì)我國代孕的立法構(gòu)想,基于前部分論證,提出代孕立法的基本原則和框架。第八部分為結(jié)語,總結(jié)文章的研究成果,指出其不足之處,并進(jìn)一步展望下一步研究工作。
[Abstract]:A surrogate to assisted reproductive technology, which first appeared in the United States, along with the development of biomedical technology developed rapidly in the high rate of infertility. Today, surrogacy has become a kind of comparatively simple and feasible alternative. Surrogate technology and other high and new technology, advantages and disadvantages, because of its wide application in the world, caused a series of legal, ethical and medical issues, caused great controversy. As for the implementation of the surrogate purpose, object and scope of application, there is no unified standard. Put forward a strong challenge to the traditional theory of civil law, surrogacy problems caused by this the world, countries have taken certain measures. At present our country is not a special law to regulate the provisions for surrogacy mainly focused on cloth awarded by the Ministry of Health Administration Rules. This paper discusses and analyzes the causes of surrogacy legal moral problems based on the comparative study, to demonstrate the legitimacy of the case analysis and other methods of surrogacy, thus realize that blindly adopt methods to prevent prohibition of surrogacy, and can not solve the problem from the root, and should find more reasonable. In view of this, put forward a bold vision of surrogacy legislation in our country, in order from the legal perspective to promote surrogacy to mature, perfect the direction of development. This article is divided into the following parts: the first part is introduction, including research background, research contents, research methods, four aspects the significance of the research. The second part is the summary of surrogacy, the classification based on defining the concept of surrogacy, and discusses the status quo of China's surrogacy. The third part is mainly about the domestic outside pregnancy legislation Situation analysis, from the two perspectives at home and abroad, introduces the current legislation of surrogacy, and summarizes the present situation of foreign legislation and the enlightenment to our country. The fourth part is the analysis of the legitimacy of surrogacy, surrogacy to prove the legitimacy from the angle of ethics and law, based on the related surrogate ethical and reproductive rights on the legal basis, the right of body problems, analysis of various contradictions and conflicts existing, laid the cornerstone for the legalization of surrogacy; the fifth part is about the analysis of the surrogate reasonable value of existence, from multiple angles to demonstrate the necessity of the existence of a reasonable surrogate type and regulation. The sixth part of the legalization of surrogacy, to distinguish between different types of surrogacy then, according to different types, according to the principle of regulation. The seventh part is the legislation conception of China's surrogacy, before part of the argument based on the basic principles and framework of the surrogacy legislation. The eight part is the conclusion, summarizing the research results of the article, pointing out its shortcomings, and further looking forward to the next step of the research work.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 楊立新;論公民身體權(quán)及其民法保護(hù)[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1994年06期

2 劉敏華;張翠珍;石靜芳;賈淑平;李敏;徐素琴;;不孕癥病因分析[J];河北醫(yī)藥;2012年05期

3 劉萃;張卓婭;;商業(yè)性代孕合同性質(zhì)探究[J];學(xué)理論;2010年10期

4 張?jiān)缕?;淺析完全代孕的有條件合法化[J];寧波廣播電視大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2009年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 康茜;代孕關(guān)系的法律調(diào)整問題研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：1439931