本文關(guān)鍵詞：農(nóng)地經(jīng)營權(quán)抵押規(guī)則研究　出處：《天津商業(yè)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 三權(quán)分置 農(nóng)地經(jīng)營權(quán) 抵押

【摘要】：對于普通農(nóng)民而言,土地是其基本的生產(chǎn)生活資料。對于國家而言,經(jīng)濟發(fā)展離不開農(nóng)業(yè)提供的物質(zhì)基礎(chǔ)。從2014年“中央一號文件”首次提出允許承包土地的經(jīng)營權(quán)抵押融資起,國家從政策層面實現(xiàn)了對立法禁止耕地經(jīng)營權(quán)抵押的突破。由于農(nóng)地經(jīng)營權(quán)抵押流轉(zhuǎn)還處在試點階段,目前缺乏針對農(nóng)地抵押具體機制設(shè)計的研究。當(dāng)前,農(nóng)地經(jīng)營權(quán)抵押規(guī)則并不能被一般的不動產(chǎn)抵押規(guī)則所函括,其在抵押主體、客體、設(shè)定及實現(xiàn)方式等諸多方面具有特殊性。如何使農(nóng)地經(jīng)營權(quán)抵押在法律上有規(guī)范表述是目前我們探討的重點。所以,農(nóng)地經(jīng)營權(quán)抵押規(guī)則的研究具有重要意義。本文除前言和結(jié)語以外,主要分三個部分進行論述。第一部分主要介紹了農(nóng)地經(jīng)營權(quán)及抵押的相關(guān)概念的界定,就農(nóng)地經(jīng)營權(quán)的內(nèi)涵及農(nóng)地經(jīng)營權(quán)抵押的特殊性分析。通過梳理文獻及試點經(jīng)驗,確定農(nóng)地經(jīng)營權(quán)的內(nèi)涵。此外,本部分對農(nóng)地經(jīng)營權(quán)的性質(zhì)作出界定,承認其物權(quán)性質(zhì),為后文的農(nóng)地經(jīng)營權(quán)抵押規(guī)則構(gòu)建奠定基礎(chǔ)。第二部分主要介紹農(nóng)地經(jīng)營權(quán)抵押權(quán)的設(shè)立規(guī)則與設(shè)立限制,在梳理司法判例的基礎(chǔ)上,從規(guī)范角度將實踐中的糾紛涵蓋,通過對農(nóng)地經(jīng)營權(quán)抵押的內(nèi)部法律關(guān)系予以梳理,對農(nóng)地經(jīng)營權(quán)抵押主體作出分類并對其特殊權(quán)利義務(wù)予以分析,尋求抵押主體之間利益的平衡。對農(nóng)地經(jīng)營權(quán)抵押標(biāo)的范圍的分析,明確農(nóng)地經(jīng)營權(quán)抵押標(biāo)的僅為農(nóng)地經(jīng)營權(quán)。農(nóng)地經(jīng)營權(quán)抵押權(quán)登記采登記生效模式,并肯定類推適用在抵押登記中的有限應(yīng)用。第三部分主要介紹農(nóng)地經(jīng)營權(quán)抵押權(quán)的實現(xiàn)規(guī)則。本文在傳統(tǒng)不動產(chǎn)抵押權(quán)實現(xiàn)條件基礎(chǔ)上加入了農(nóng)業(yè)經(jīng)營企業(yè)破產(chǎn)時的實現(xiàn)條件。實現(xiàn)方式方面,農(nóng)地經(jīng)營權(quán)抵押權(quán)的實現(xiàn)分為一般實現(xiàn)方式和特殊實現(xiàn)方式,根據(jù)農(nóng)地經(jīng)營權(quán)的特性,提出農(nóng)地經(jīng)營權(quán)抵押權(quán)實現(xiàn)時應(yīng)強化實現(xiàn)擔(dān)保物權(quán)特殊程序的作用,并發(fā)揮強制管理的優(yōu)越性。
[Abstract]:For ordinary farmers, land is their basic means of livelihood. Economic development can not be separated from the material basis provided by agriculture. Since 2014, the "No. 1 document of the Central Committee" has proposed for the first time to allow mortgage financing of the management right of contracted land. From the policy level, the government has realized the breakthrough of the legislation prohibiting the mortgage of the farmland management right. Because the circulation of the farmland management right mortgage is still in the pilot stage, there is a lack of research on the design of the specific mechanism of the farmland mortgage at present. The mortgage rules of farmland management right can not be included in the general rules of real estate mortgage, but in the subject and object of the mortgage. Such aspects as setting and realizing way have particularity. How to make the farmland management right mortgage in the legal standard expression is the focal point that we discuss at present. In addition to the foreword and conclusion, this paper mainly discusses three parts. The first part mainly introduces the definition of the related concepts of farmland management right and mortgage. Through combing the literature and experimental experience, the connotation of farmland management right is determined. In addition, this part defines the nature of farmland management right. The second part mainly introduces the establishment of the rules and limitations of the establishment of the mortgage on the management of agricultural land, on the basis of combing the judicial precedents. From the normative point of view, the disputes in practice will be covered, through the collation of the internal legal relationship of the right to the management of agricultural land mortgage to sort out the subject of the right to manage agricultural land mortgage and its special rights and obligations to be analyzed. To seek the balance of interests between the subject of mortgage. To analyze the scope of the subject matter of the mortgage of the right to manage agricultural land, make clear that the subject matter of mortgage of the right of management of agricultural land is only the right of management of agricultural land. The third part mainly introduces the realization rules of the mortgage of farmland management right. This paper adds the bankruptcy of the agricultural management enterprise on the basis of the realization condition of the traditional real estate mortgage. Implementation conditions and implementation methods. The realization of the mortgage of farmland management right can be divided into general realization mode and special realization mode. According to the characteristics of farmland management right, this paper puts forward that the special procedure of realizing security right should be strengthened when realizing the mortgage of farmland management right. And give play to the superiority of compulsory management.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津商業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D923.2;D922.32

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 賀晉紅;;類推適用在農(nóng)地經(jīng)營權(quán)抵押中的有限應(yīng)用[J];天津農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué);2017年03期

2 浙江省縉云縣人民法院課題組;;農(nóng)村土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)抵押問題研究——以浙江省縉云縣為樣本[J];法律適用;2017年01期

3 黃延廷;高銘遠;;農(nóng)地承包權(quán)與經(jīng)營權(quán)分離的特殊價值與風(fēng)險防范[J];江蘇農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué);2016年05期

4 申惠文;;論農(nóng)村承包經(jīng)營戶的死亡[J];河南財經(jīng)政法大學(xué)學(xué)報;2016年02期

5 蔡立東;姜楠;;承包權(quán)與經(jīng)營權(quán)分置的法構(gòu)造[J];法學(xué)研究;2015年03期

6 申惠文;;債權(quán)物權(quán)二元財產(chǎn)權(quán)體系視角下的農(nóng)村土地經(jīng)營權(quán)[J];云南大學(xué)學(xué)報(法學(xué)版);2015年03期

7 申惠文;;農(nóng)地三權(quán)分離改革的法學(xué)反思與批判[J];河北法學(xué);2015年04期

8 王立爭;;新時期農(nóng)村土地承包制度改革的路徑選擇[J];農(nóng)村經(jīng)濟;2015年02期

9 張力;鄭志峰;;推進農(nóng)村土地承包權(quán)與經(jīng)營權(quán)再分離的法制構(gòu)造研究[J];農(nóng)業(yè)經(jīng)濟問題;2015年01期

10 朱永永;;土地流轉(zhuǎn)視角下農(nóng)村土地銀行運作機制研究[J];河北法學(xué);2014年10期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 馮華;陳仁澤;;農(nóng)村土地制度改革，底線不能突破[N];人民日報;2013年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 惠獻波;農(nóng)地經(jīng)營權(quán)抵押貸款供需分析與效率評價研究[D];沈陽農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2014年

2 王金堂;土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)制度的困局與解破[D];西南政法大學(xué);2012年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 尹丹丹;民事執(zhí)行中農(nóng)村土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)強制管理研究[D];江西師范大學(xué);2014年

，

本文編號：1438766