本文選題：競業(yè)禁止 + 商業(yè)秘密��； 參考：《東北財經(jīng)大學》2007年碩士論文

【摘要】： 在競爭的市場環(huán)境下，企業(yè)要想在市場上占有一定的份額，必須具備不為公眾所知悉，能為企業(yè)帶來經(jīng)濟效益的技術信息和經(jīng)營信息等商業(yè)秘密。作為一項保護雇主的商業(yè)秘密，平衡雇主與雇員之間要求合法競爭和爭取擇業(yè)自由權的制度安排，競業(yè)禁止制度在對商業(yè)秘密保護過程中不可避免的要面對不同社會群體間的利益沖突。從競業(yè)禁止制度的發(fā)展史看，其建構過程就是一個利益平衡與協(xié)調的過程，其中沒有絕對的優(yōu)勢利益，只有相對和變化著的優(yōu)勢利益。建立競業(yè)禁止制度的根本目的，正是要在各種利益不斷變化發(fā)展的過程中，保持各種社會利益的平衡和總體利益的最大化。 出于保守商業(yè)秘密的考慮，已有較多的企事業(yè)單位，通過協(xié)議或內(nèi)部規(guī)章，對職員作出競業(yè)禁止的規(guī)范與約定，即禁止職員在職期間和離職后與本單位進行業(yè)務競爭。但是，依我國憲法、勞動法等法律、法規(guī)，勞動者享有勞動就業(yè)權和擇業(yè)自由權。這就要求，保護商業(yè)秘密的競業(yè)禁止，必須置于合理的限制條件下，在特定需要的情形中，由當事人自愿約定或由法律直接規(guī)定，，使之不與職工依法享有的平等就業(yè)權和擇業(yè)自由權相沖突，不違背自由貿(mào)易和公平競爭的市場經(jīng)濟法則，并符合誠實信用、自愿平等的原則。 盡管我國在一些法律中規(guī)定了保護商業(yè)秘密的競業(yè)禁止條款，但與國外先進國家相比尚有不足，實踐中有些制度尚需完善。本文分五部分闡述了有關商業(yè)秘密保護中的競業(yè)禁止制度的理論和實踐問題。 第一部分，競業(yè)禁止制度的一般原理。主要介紹了競業(yè)禁止制度與相關概念的比較，并從競業(yè)禁止分類的角度闡述了法定、約定以及在職期間和離職后的競業(yè)禁止。由于我國現(xiàn)階段的競業(yè)禁止多體現(xiàn)為職工離職后的競業(yè)禁止，為平衡雇主和雇員之間的利益沖突，競業(yè)禁止協(xié)議的效力便更加凸現(xiàn)出其重要性。因此本文從形式要件和實質要件兩方面來規(guī)制競業(yè)禁止的生效要件。 第二部分，國內(nèi)外有關競業(yè)禁止的立法概況。首先以美國、德國和日本為例介紹了國外有關競業(yè)禁止的立法概況，以期從中尋找出值得我國競業(yè)禁止制度借鑒的寶貴經(jīng)驗。其次，分析了我國有關商業(yè)秘密保護中的競業(yè)禁止的立法現(xiàn)狀，為后文中提到的我國競業(yè)禁止的立法缺陷和完善作了必要的鋪墊。 第三部分，在商業(yè)秘密保護領域建立競業(yè)禁止制度的必要性。以人才流動為商業(yè)秘密流失的主要原因這一現(xiàn)象，引出競業(yè)禁止是商業(yè)秘密保護的重要手段。并從法的經(jīng)濟學角度探討了競業(yè)禁止制度保護商業(yè)秘密的經(jīng)濟合理性。 第四部分，競業(yè)禁止制度的法益衡量。競業(yè)禁止制度在對商業(yè)秘密保護過程中不可避免的要面對不同社會群體間的利益沖突。在各沖突利益均為合法利益的情況下，就涉及到利益沖突的解決，而解決的手段就是“法益衡量”。文章通過對競業(yè)禁止制度的效力和價值取向分析，闡述了競業(yè)禁止制度如何實現(xiàn)保護商業(yè)秘密與社會公共利益的平衡。 第五部分，構建合理的競業(yè)禁止法律體系。針對第二部分中提到的我國有關商業(yè)秘密保護中的競業(yè)禁止的立法現(xiàn)狀，指出了我國目前有關競業(yè)禁止制度的缺陷和不足，并提出了完善我國競業(yè)禁止制度的建議措施。
[Abstract]:In the market environment of competition , enterprises want to share a certain share in the market , and must have business secrets such as technical information and business information which are not known to the public and bring economic benefits to enterprises . As a trade secret of protecting employers , the construction process is a process of balancing and coordinating interests .





In view of the conservative trade secrets , there are many enterprises and institutions , through the agreement or internal regulation , the regulation and agreement of the employees to compete for business . However , according to the laws and regulations such as the constitution and labor law of our country , the workers have the right to labor employment and the right to choose the industry . However , according to the laws , regulations and workers of our country ' s constitution and labor law , the workers have the right to labor employment and the right to choose the industry .





Although China has stipulated in some laws the competition prohibition clause to protect the trade secrets , there are some defects in the practice compared with the advanced countries in foreign countries . In the practice , some systems need to be improved . The article points out the theory and practice of the competition prohibition system in the protection of trade secrets .





The first part , the general principle of the competition prohibition system , mainly introduces the comparison between the competition prohibition system and the relevant concepts , and expounds the legal , the contract and the post - service competition prohibition from the angle of the competition prohibition classification .





In the second part , the domestic and foreign legislation of competition prohibition is introduced . First , the legislation of foreign competition prohibition is introduced in the United States , Germany and Japan , in order to find out the valuable experience which is worthy of reference for our country ' s competitive ban system . Secondly , it analyzes the current legislation status of competition prohibition in the protection of trade secrets in our country , and lays the necessary cushion for the legislative flaw and perfection of Chinese competition prohibition mentioned later .





In the third part , the necessity of establishing a competition prohibition system in the field of trade secret protection is established . The phenomenon that the brain drain is the main cause of the loss of trade secrets is an important means to protect the trade secret .





In the fourth part , the method of the competition prohibition system is measured . The competition prohibition system inevitably faces the conflict of interest among different social groups during the protection of the trade secret . In the case that the interests of each conflict are legitimate interests , the solution to the conflict of interest is the " law benefit measurement " . The article expounds how to realize the balance between the protection business secret and the social public interest by analyzing the effectiveness and the value orientation of the competition prohibition system .





In the fifth part , the reasonable competition law system is constructed . In the light of the present state of the legislation in the second part concerning the prohibition of competition in trade secret protection , the author points out the defects and shortcomings of the current competition prohibition system in our country , and puts forward some suggestions to perfect our country ' s competitive ban system .

【學位授予單位】：東北財經(jīng)大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2007
【分類號】：D912.29;D913

【引證文獻】

相關博士學位論文 前1條

1 翟業(yè)虎;競業(yè)禁止法律問題研究[D];黑龍江大學;2013年

本文編號：1848208