工傷保險賠償與侵權(quán)損害賠償?shù)母偤涎芯?/H1>
發(fā)布時間：2018-05-05 10:51
本文選題：工傷 + 工傷保險�。� 參考：《江西農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)》2016年碩士論文
【摘要】：由于我國飛速發(fā)展的經(jīng)濟和不斷深入的工業(yè)化建設(shè),現(xiàn)代機器的使用在逐年遞增,勞動者面臨的風(fēng)險也不斷增加,從而導(dǎo)致工傷事故的發(fā)生率不斷升高,而且已經(jīng)發(fā)展成我們無法忽視的社會問題。工傷事故發(fā)生的多,涉及到的人群數(shù)量也越來越多,這使得在事故發(fā)生后,如何對受害者進行補償這一問題亟待我們?nèi)ソ鉀Q。由于工傷事故的賠償既可以由《工傷保險條例》調(diào)整,又可由《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》調(diào)整,而我們從各國對這個問題的處理現(xiàn)狀中可以發(fā)現(xiàn):解決這個問題的關(guān)鍵之處就在于處理好二者之間的適用關(guān)系。然而我國目前關(guān)于工傷事故賠償?shù)姆芍贫认鄬^少,在侵權(quán)法中也沒有對工傷侵權(quán)賠償做出規(guī)定,勞動法對此規(guī)定也僅限于工傷保險,并且適用范圍十分有限。而在如何處理兩者之間的關(guān)系的問題上,我國法律還沒對此問題有過明文規(guī)定,同時僅有的規(guī)定之間還存在一定的矛盾。因此我們可以想象受害人在發(fā)生工傷事故后會發(fā)生一種兩難的局面�？梢�,工傷事故賠償?shù)姆蓹C制的缺乏將帶來嚴重的社會問題,同時會引起廣泛的社會關(guān)注。因此筆者將會著眼于此并在下文中展開討論。除去緒論與結(jié)論,本文分為四個部分。第一部分對相關(guān)概念,如“工傷”、“工傷保險賠償”、“侵權(quán)損害賠償”等進行了界定。然后對這兩種救濟方式進行了比較,第一是法的價值目標(biāo)不同,第二是二者的歸責(zé)原則不同,第三是二者的功能不同,第四是賠償范圍和標(biāo)準不同,第五是二者救濟程序不同。最后本部分還闡述了二者發(fā)生競合的原因。接著第二部分筆者著重闡述了我國在此問題上現(xiàn)存的相關(guān)法律法規(guī),同時分析了其中存在的不足之處。然后在第三部分中簡述了對這個問題各國的處理模式主要有“選擇模式”、“替代模式”、“兼得模式”與“補充模式”,并分析了這幾種模式的利與弊。最后第四部分綜合外國的處理模式,借鑒國外的經(jīng)驗,探討適用于我國的處理模式。本文的創(chuàng)新之處在于,對工傷保險賠償與侵權(quán)損害賠償進行了較為全面的比較,提出根據(jù)工傷發(fā)生的不同的原因,采取不同的處理方式,也就是從無第三人侵權(quán)的情況和有第三人介入兩方面分析,無第三人情況下又細分為雇主無過失及雇主有過失的情況。并且本文不是采取單一的某種模式解決此問題,而是根據(jù)各種模式的優(yōu)點進行整合與改良從而得出結(jié)論。在盡可能的維護受害人的權(quán)益的同時協(xié)調(diào)勞動者以及用人單位的關(guān)系,從而構(gòu)建和諧的勞動關(guān)系。
[Abstract]:Due to the rapid development of economy and the deepening industrialization of our country, the use of modern machines is increasing year by year, and the risks faced by workers are also increasing, which leads to the increasing incidence of industrial accidents. And has developed into a social problem that we cannot ignore. The number of people involved in industrial accidents is more and more, which makes it urgent for us to solve the problem of how to compensate the victims after the accidents. As compensation for industrial accidents can be adjusted by the Industrial injury Insurance Ordinance and the Tort liability Act, We can find out from the current situation of dealing with this problem in various countries: the key to solve this problem is to deal with the applicable relationship between them. However, there are relatively few legal systems on compensation for industrial accidents in our country at present, and there is no provision for compensation for industrial injury infringement in tort law, which is limited to industrial injury insurance by labor law, and its scope of application is very limited. However, on how to deal with the relationship between the two, the law of our country has not clearly stipulated the problem, and there are still some contradictions between the only provisions. So we can imagine a dilemma for the victim after the accident. It can be seen that the lack of legal mechanism for compensation for industrial accidents will bring serious social problems and cause widespread social concern. Therefore, I will focus on this and in the following discussion. Apart from the introduction and conclusion, this paper is divided into four parts. The first part defines the related concepts, such as industrial injury, industrial injury insurance compensation, tort damages and so on. Then the author compares the two kinds of relief methods. The first is the different value goal of the law, the second is the different imputation principle, the third is the function of the two, the fourth is the compensation scope and the standard, and the fifth is the difference of the relief procedure between the two. Finally, this part also explains the reason of the two competing. Then the second part focuses on the existing laws and regulations on this issue, and analyzes the shortcomings. Then, in the third part, the author briefly describes the modes of dealing with this problem in various countries, such as "choice mode", "substitute mode", "both acquisitive mode" and "complementary mode", and analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of these models. Finally, the fourth part synthesizes the foreign treatment mode, draws lessons from the foreign experience, and probes into the treatment mode suitable for our country. The innovation of this paper is that the compensation of industrial injury insurance is compared with the compensation of tort damage, and the different ways of dealing with it are put forward according to the different causes of industrial injury. That is from the situation of no third party infringement and the third person involved in two aspects of analysis, no third person situation and subdivided into the employer no fault and the employer has fault situation. And this paper does not adopt a single model to solve this problem, but according to the advantages of various models to integrate and improve to draw a conclusion. While protecting the rights and interests of the victims as much as possible to coordinate the relationship between workers and employers to build a harmonious labor relationship.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：江西農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：D922.55
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 雷杰淇;薛柏成;;論工傷保險與民事賠償請求權(quán)的競合[J];江西社會科學(xué);2016年01期
2 王澤鑒;;民法學(xué)說與判例研究 重排合訂本[J];政法論壇;2015年05期
3 耿夏夏;;工傷保險賠償與民事侵權(quán)賠償?shù)暮侠磉m用關(guān)系研究[J];法制博覽;2015年11期
4 侯君;;工傷保險賠付與侵權(quán)損害賠償競合時部分兼得模式的構(gòu)建[J];科技創(chuàng)新導(dǎo)報;2014年20期
5 胡曉玉;田苗;萬靜華;;工傷保險責(zé)任與交通事故侵權(quán)責(zé)任競合探討[J];知識經(jīng)濟;2014年14期
6 岑雨楊;;論民事侵權(quán)與工傷保險責(zé)任的競合[J];新西部(理論版);2014年11期
7 寧立林;;我國工傷損害賠償?shù)姆蛇m用探析[J];青海社會科學(xué);2014年02期
8 管澄偉;;工傷保險賠償與民事?lián)p害賠償競合的處理[J];唯實;2014年03期
9 肖洪鳴;;淺析工傷賠償與民事侵權(quán)賠償?shù)母偤蟍J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2014年01期
10 周瑞;;工傷責(zé)任競合適用模式探析[J];湖北警官學(xué)院學(xué)報;2014年01期
，
本文編號：1847413
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/laodongfa/1847413.html
本文選題：工傷 + 工傷保險�。� 參考：《江西農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)》2016年碩士論文
【摘要】：由于我國飛速發(fā)展的經(jīng)濟和不斷深入的工業(yè)化建設(shè),現(xiàn)代機器的使用在逐年遞增,勞動者面臨的風(fēng)險也不斷增加,從而導(dǎo)致工傷事故的發(fā)生率不斷升高,而且已經(jīng)發(fā)展成我們無法忽視的社會問題。工傷事故發(fā)生的多,涉及到的人群數(shù)量也越來越多,這使得在事故發(fā)生后,如何對受害者進行補償這一問題亟待我們?nèi)ソ鉀Q。由于工傷事故的賠償既可以由《工傷保險條例》調(diào)整,又可由《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》調(diào)整,而我們從各國對這個問題的處理現(xiàn)狀中可以發(fā)現(xiàn):解決這個問題的關(guān)鍵之處就在于處理好二者之間的適用關(guān)系。然而我國目前關(guān)于工傷事故賠償?shù)姆芍贫认鄬^少,在侵權(quán)法中也沒有對工傷侵權(quán)賠償做出規(guī)定,勞動法對此規(guī)定也僅限于工傷保險,并且適用范圍十分有限。而在如何處理兩者之間的關(guān)系的問題上,我國法律還沒對此問題有過明文規(guī)定,同時僅有的規(guī)定之間還存在一定的矛盾。因此我們可以想象受害人在發(fā)生工傷事故后會發(fā)生一種兩難的局面�？梢�,工傷事故賠償?shù)姆蓹C制的缺乏將帶來嚴重的社會問題,同時會引起廣泛的社會關(guān)注。因此筆者將會著眼于此并在下文中展開討論。除去緒論與結(jié)論,本文分為四個部分。第一部分對相關(guān)概念,如“工傷”、“工傷保險賠償”、“侵權(quán)損害賠償”等進行了界定。然后對這兩種救濟方式進行了比較,第一是法的價值目標(biāo)不同,第二是二者的歸責(zé)原則不同,第三是二者的功能不同,第四是賠償范圍和標(biāo)準不同,第五是二者救濟程序不同。最后本部分還闡述了二者發(fā)生競合的原因。接著第二部分筆者著重闡述了我國在此問題上現(xiàn)存的相關(guān)法律法規(guī),同時分析了其中存在的不足之處。然后在第三部分中簡述了對這個問題各國的處理模式主要有“選擇模式”、“替代模式”、“兼得模式”與“補充模式”,并分析了這幾種模式的利與弊。最后第四部分綜合外國的處理模式,借鑒國外的經(jīng)驗,探討適用于我國的處理模式。本文的創(chuàng)新之處在于,對工傷保險賠償與侵權(quán)損害賠償進行了較為全面的比較,提出根據(jù)工傷發(fā)生的不同的原因,采取不同的處理方式,也就是從無第三人侵權(quán)的情況和有第三人介入兩方面分析,無第三人情況下又細分為雇主無過失及雇主有過失的情況。并且本文不是采取單一的某種模式解決此問題,而是根據(jù)各種模式的優(yōu)點進行整合與改良從而得出結(jié)論。在盡可能的維護受害人的權(quán)益的同時協(xié)調(diào)勞動者以及用人單位的關(guān)系,從而構(gòu)建和諧的勞動關(guān)系。
[Abstract]:Due to the rapid development of economy and the deepening industrialization of our country, the use of modern machines is increasing year by year, and the risks faced by workers are also increasing, which leads to the increasing incidence of industrial accidents. And has developed into a social problem that we cannot ignore. The number of people involved in industrial accidents is more and more, which makes it urgent for us to solve the problem of how to compensate the victims after the accidents. As compensation for industrial accidents can be adjusted by the Industrial injury Insurance Ordinance and the Tort liability Act, We can find out from the current situation of dealing with this problem in various countries: the key to solve this problem is to deal with the applicable relationship between them. However, there are relatively few legal systems on compensation for industrial accidents in our country at present, and there is no provision for compensation for industrial injury infringement in tort law, which is limited to industrial injury insurance by labor law, and its scope of application is very limited. However, on how to deal with the relationship between the two, the law of our country has not clearly stipulated the problem, and there are still some contradictions between the only provisions. So we can imagine a dilemma for the victim after the accident. It can be seen that the lack of legal mechanism for compensation for industrial accidents will bring serious social problems and cause widespread social concern. Therefore, I will focus on this and in the following discussion. Apart from the introduction and conclusion, this paper is divided into four parts. The first part defines the related concepts, such as industrial injury, industrial injury insurance compensation, tort damages and so on. Then the author compares the two kinds of relief methods. The first is the different value goal of the law, the second is the different imputation principle, the third is the function of the two, the fourth is the compensation scope and the standard, and the fifth is the difference of the relief procedure between the two. Finally, this part also explains the reason of the two competing. Then the second part focuses on the existing laws and regulations on this issue, and analyzes the shortcomings. Then, in the third part, the author briefly describes the modes of dealing with this problem in various countries, such as "choice mode", "substitute mode", "both acquisitive mode" and "complementary mode", and analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of these models. Finally, the fourth part synthesizes the foreign treatment mode, draws lessons from the foreign experience, and probes into the treatment mode suitable for our country. The innovation of this paper is that the compensation of industrial injury insurance is compared with the compensation of tort damage, and the different ways of dealing with it are put forward according to the different causes of industrial injury. That is from the situation of no third party infringement and the third person involved in two aspects of analysis, no third person situation and subdivided into the employer no fault and the employer has fault situation. And this paper does not adopt a single model to solve this problem, but according to the advantages of various models to integrate and improve to draw a conclusion. While protecting the rights and interests of the victims as much as possible to coordinate the relationship between workers and employers to build a harmonious labor relationship.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：江西農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：D922.55
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 雷杰淇;薛柏成;;論工傷保險與民事賠償請求權(quán)的競合[J];江西社會科學(xué);2016年01期
2 王澤鑒;;民法學(xué)說與判例研究 重排合訂本[J];政法論壇;2015年05期
3 耿夏夏;;工傷保險賠償與民事侵權(quán)賠償?shù)暮侠磉m用關(guān)系研究[J];法制博覽;2015年11期
4 侯君;;工傷保險賠付與侵權(quán)損害賠償競合時部分兼得模式的構(gòu)建[J];科技創(chuàng)新導(dǎo)報;2014年20期
5 胡曉玉;田苗;萬靜華;;工傷保險責(zé)任與交通事故侵權(quán)責(zé)任競合探討[J];知識經(jīng)濟;2014年14期
6 岑雨楊;;論民事侵權(quán)與工傷保險責(zé)任的競合[J];新西部(理論版);2014年11期
7 寧立林;;我國工傷損害賠償?shù)姆蛇m用探析[J];青海社會科學(xué);2014年02期
8 管澄偉;;工傷保險賠償與民事?lián)p害賠償競合的處理[J];唯實;2014年03期
9 肖洪鳴;;淺析工傷賠償與民事侵權(quán)賠償?shù)母偤蟍J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2014年01期
10 周瑞;;工傷責(zé)任競合適用模式探析[J];湖北警官學(xué)院學(xué)報;2014年01期
，本文編號：1847413
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/laodongfa/1847413.html
最近更新
教材專著
