本文選題：公司人格否認(rèn)制度　切入點(diǎn)：勞動(dòng)糾紛　出處：《湘潭大學(xué)》2016年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：我國在2006年實(shí)施的《公司法》第20條中規(guī)定了公司人格否認(rèn)制度,這是我國《公司法》所做的一次大膽嘗試,也是公司法人人格制度的一大進(jìn)步。在21世紀(jì)的中國,商品經(jīng)濟(jì)高速發(fā)展,公司作為市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)的主體發(fā)揮著重要的作用,多數(shù)公司都能夠遵循誠實(shí)信用原則,善良風(fēng)俗原則和禁止權(quán)利濫用原則。但是,我國在實(shí)施公司制度的實(shí)踐中也存在一些突出的問題。一些公司利用公司法人人格獨(dú)立和股東有限責(zé)任制度逃避合同義務(wù)、法律義務(wù)等,這些行為嚴(yán)重地?fù)p害了債權(quán)人的利益。公司人格否認(rèn)制度在我國主要運(yùn)用于民商法領(lǐng)域。雖然近些年對(duì)于將公司人格否認(rèn)制度移植到其他法中的呼聲越來越高,如稅法、環(huán)境法、產(chǎn)品責(zé)任法等,但是很少有學(xué)者討論公司人格否認(rèn)制度在勞動(dòng)糾紛中的適用。然而當(dāng)今社會(huì)中股東利用公司的面紗來逃避對(duì)勞動(dòng)者的法律責(zé)任的現(xiàn)象很普遍。因此本文針對(duì)這種現(xiàn)象,嘗試將公司人格否認(rèn)制度移植到勞動(dòng)糾紛的解決中,重點(diǎn)討論在勞動(dòng)糾紛案件中,股東或用人單位濫用公司法人人格,逃避法律責(zé)任,嚴(yán)重?fù)p害勞動(dòng)者合法權(quán)益的現(xiàn)象以及將兩種制度如何銜接在一起。公司人格否認(rèn)制度作為法人人格制度的補(bǔ)充和完善,具有其自身的獨(dú)立性,但是需要注意不論在何種范圍內(nèi)運(yùn)用該制度,都要明確的一點(diǎn)是,法人格否認(rèn)制度只是一種例外制度,并不能隨意濫用,以免動(dòng)搖公司有限責(zé)任。因此適用這一制度首先必須要滿足其適用要件,并且在現(xiàn)行的《勞動(dòng)法》中的具體制度無法救濟(jì)勞動(dòng)者的情形下才能適用。希望本文能為勞動(dòng)糾紛的解決提供一點(diǎn)幫助,也希望本文為公司人格否認(rèn)制度在其他法領(lǐng)域的適用提供借鑒。
[Abstract]:The disavowal system of corporate personality has been stipulated in Article 20 of the Company Law implemented in 2006 in China, which is a bold attempt made by the Company Law of our country and a great progress of the system of corporate personality. With the rapid development of commodity economy, companies play an important role as the main body of market economy. Most companies are able to follow the principles of good faith, kind-hearted customs and prohibition of abuse of rights. There are also some outstanding problems in the practice of implementing the corporate system in China. Some companies use the corporate personality independence and the shareholders limited liability system to evade the contractual obligations, legal obligations, and so on. These acts have seriously damaged the interests of creditors. Corporate personality denial system is mainly used in the field of civil and commercial law in China. Although in recent years, there are more and more calls to transplant corporate personality denial system into other laws, such as the tax law. Environmental law, product liability law, etc., But few scholars discuss the application of corporate personality denial system in labor disputes. However, the phenomenon of shareholders using the corporate veil to evade their legal liability to workers is very common in today's society. Therefore, this paper aims at this phenomenon. This paper attempts to transplant the system of corporate personality denial to the settlement of labor disputes, with emphasis on the abuse of corporate personality by shareholders or employers in cases of labor disputes, in order to evade legal liability. The phenomenon of seriously harming the legitimate rights and interests of workers and how to link the two systems together. As a supplement and perfection of the legal personality system, the corporate personality denial system has its own independence. However, it should be noted that whatever the scope of the application of the system, it should be clear that the system of legal personality denial is only an exceptional system and can not be abused at will. Do not shake the limited liability of the company. Therefore, the application of this system must first meet its applicable requirements, And in the current "Labor Law" in the specific system can not help workers can be applied. I hope this article can provide a little help for the resolution of labor disputes, I also hope that this article can be used as a reference for the application of the corporate personality denial system in other areas of law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號(hào)】：D922.291.91

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 石少俠;;公司法若干制度的司法適用[J];中國檢察官;2014年01期

2 金洪玉;;公司法人格否認(rèn)的制度困境與類型化分析[J];暨南學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年11期

3 黃進(jìn);;公司法人格否認(rèn)之探討[J];法制與社會(huì);2011年05期

4 雷興虎;劉斌;;拓寬公司法人格否認(rèn)訴求主體之范圍——強(qiáng)化公司社會(huì)責(zé)任的最佳途徑[J];西南政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2010年05期

5 林海榕;;揭開公司面紗原則適用條件研究——合同法與侵權(quán)法的視角[J];和田師范專科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2008年06期

6 劉俊海;;新公司法中揭開公司面紗制度的解釋難點(diǎn)探析[J];同濟(jì)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年06期

7 石少俠;;公司人格否認(rèn)制度的司法適用[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2006年05期

8 金劍鋒;公司人格否認(rèn)理論及其在我國的實(shí)踐[J];中國法學(xué);2005年02期

9 孟勤國,張素華;公司法人人格否認(rèn)理論與股東有限責(zé)任[J];中國法學(xué);2004年03期

10 范曉陽;淺談“公司人格否認(rèn)原則”的適用要件及完善[J];遼寧公安司法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：1558069