本文關鍵詞： 見義勇為行為 無因管理 受益人 補償請求權　出處：《廣西師范大學》2010年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】： 見義勇為是人類社會精神文明的體現(xiàn),一直倍受道德的推崇與贊賞。當前在強調(diào)見義勇為道德價值的同時,忽視了見義勇為者的權益保障問題,造成大量英雄事后救濟難的悲劇發(fā)生。本文認為僅僅對見義勇為者進行道德上的贊揚是不夠的,更要注重對見義勇為者的權益保障。由此,本文分別從見義勇為行為的基本界定、法律屬性、見義勇為的立法現(xiàn)狀、國外“見義勇為法”對我國的借鑒以及見義勇為立法之構想等五方面內(nèi)容進行分析研究,以期有助于推進對見義勇為者權益保障問題的理論研究。 文章結(jié)構由引言、正文和結(jié)論三部分組成。全文約41000字,主要內(nèi)容簡介如下： 引言以案例的形式提出問題：當今社會由于缺乏一個與見義勇為相對應的保障機制,造成了大量英雄流血又流淚的悲劇發(fā)生。為此,本文試對見義勇為相關法律問題做一些必要探討,期望將來對全國見義勇為保障立法有所促進。 正文共分五章內(nèi)容： 第一章內(nèi)容是見義勇為行為的基本界定。本章共分四節(jié)：第一節(jié)是綜合比較見義勇為行為在詞典中的釋義與地方立法中的界定,提出本文的見解,最后得出本文對見義勇為行為的概念界定；第二節(jié)是分別從主體、客體、主觀因素及客觀因素等四方面對見義勇為行為的法律成立要件予以界定；第三節(jié)是對見義勇為行為與正當防衛(wèi)、緊急避險、無因管理以及助人為樂等行為的異同進行比較分析,以區(qū)別二者的差異；最后一節(jié)討論的是見義勇為行為的基本類型,根據(jù)不同分類見義勇為者尋求的救濟范圍有所不同。 第二章是見義勇為行為的法律屬性。本章分二部分內(nèi)容：第一部分主要是簡要介紹目前國內(nèi)關于界定見義勇為行為法律性質(zhì)分別為正當防衛(wèi)、緊急避險、防止侵害、行政協(xié)助、無因管理等各種學說,并對這些學說進行比較分析；第二部分是提出本文對見義勇為行為的法律性質(zhì)的界定,認為見義勇為行為是兼具公、私法性質(zhì)的無因管理。 第三章是我國見義勇為的立法現(xiàn)狀。本章分二部分內(nèi)容：第一部分內(nèi)容主要從民法、勞動法和社會保障法以及地方規(guī)范性文件等三方面內(nèi)容來展開介紹目前國內(nèi)關于見義勇為者法律救濟的相關規(guī)定；第二部分是針對當前規(guī)定,提出本文認為因為缺乏見義勇為者權益保障的國家立法和國家補償義務的缺失,所以造成了見義勇為者的善后救濟不盡如人意。 第四章是國外“見義勇為法”對我國的借鑒。本章分三部分內(nèi)容：第一部分內(nèi)容是介紹國外“見義勇為法”的概況；第二部分內(nèi)容是介紹兩大法系國家規(guī)定“見義勇為法”的主要內(nèi)容；第三部分內(nèi)容是借鑒國外“見義勇為法”內(nèi)容,提出我國應在救助撤離、責任豁免以及損害補償?shù)确矫鎸σ娏x勇為者進行立法規(guī)定。 第五章是見義勇為立法之構想。本章共分二節(jié)：第一節(jié)是建議確立見義勇為者的法律救濟關系,具體包括確立見義勇為者的損害賠償請求權、補償請求權及其內(nèi)容以及法律救濟原則等；第二節(jié)是從立法形式和框架建議兩方面入手,宏觀上提出一些建議,希望能推進制定全國統(tǒng)一立法的理論研究。 結(jié)論部分,本文主張國家是見義勇為行為的受益人,應明確國家對見義勇為者補償義務主體地位。具體以法律形式規(guī)定國家以稅收通過向基金會支付基金的方式來向見義勇為者履行補償義務。同時,為了有效解決目前見義勇為者保障的相關法律救濟存在的諸多弊端,本文建議制定一部全國統(tǒng)一的《見義勇為權益保障和表彰法》,切實保障見義勇為者失有所補、殘有所養(yǎng)、德有所彰。
[Abstract]:It is not enough to pay attention to the protection of the rights and interests of the brave people , and to pay more attention to the protection of the rights and interests of the brave people . The article consists of three parts : preface , text and conclusion . The whole text is about 41,000 words . The main contents are as follows : The introduction takes the form of a case as a problem : in today ' s society , because of the lack of a safeguard mechanism corresponding to the sense of justice , a great deal of heroic blood and tears have taken place . To this end , the paper tries to make some necessary research on the relevant legal issues of the brave , and expects to promote the legislation in the future in the future . The text is divided into five chapters : The first chapter is divided into four sections : the first section is a comprehensive comparison of the definition of the behavior in the dictionary and the definition of local legislation , and puts forward the opinions of this article . Finally , the article gives a comparative analysis of the differences between the actions of the subject , object , subjective factor and objective factor . The second part of this chapter is to introduce the definition of the legal nature of the behavior of the brave act , and the second part is to put forward the definition of the legal nature of the act of moral courage . The second part is to put forward the definition of the legal nature of the act of the volunteer . The second part is to suggest that the act is the passive management of the nature of the public and private law . Chapter Three is the legislative status quo of our country ' s right of justice . This chapter is divided into two parts : the first part is mainly from the three aspects of the civil law , the labor law and the social security law and the local normative document . The second part is aiming at the current stipulation , this article argues that the lack of the national legislation and the state compensation obligation guaranteed by the rights and interests of the brave person is not satisfactory . The fourth chapter is a reference to our country from abroad . The first part of this chapter is to introduce the general situation of the " valevalour law " in foreign countries , and the second part is to introduce the main contents of " the law of justice " in foreign countries . The third part is to draw lessons from the content of " the law of the brave " in foreign countries , and put forward that our country should make legislative provisions for the brave people in the aspects of relief evacuation , exemption of responsibility and damage compensation . The first part is to establish the legal relief relation of the brave person , including the right to claim compensation for damages , the compensation claim and its contents and the principles of legal relief . The second part is to make some suggestions on the basis of the legislative form and the framework proposal , hoping to push forward the theoretical study of the national unification legislation . At the same time , in order to effectively solve the shortcomings of the legal remedies existing in the current situation , this paper proposes to establish a nationwide unified law for the protection and recognition of the rights and interests of the brave .

【學位授予單位】：廣西師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：D923

【引證文獻】

相關期刊論文 前1條

1 羅玲妹;;成本—收益視角下的“見義勇為冷漠”現(xiàn)象探析[J];天水行政學院學報;2011年05期

相關碩士學位論文 前1條

1 蘇卉;見義勇為者合法權益保護研究[D];安徽大學;2011年

，

本文編號：1465721