【摘要】：單一產品分析被認為是判斷非法搭售是否成立的前提。中國目前搭售案件分別采用功能標準、需求標準和交易習慣標準,由此引發(fā)如何設立最優(yōu)標準的疑問。單一產品標準理論上爭議較大,很難形成廣為接受的判斷標準。由此,需要從單一產品本身的法律意義出發(fā)尋求解決方案。搭售只是反壟斷法理論類型化的產物,類型化雖便于分析,但可能造成一些不必要的混淆。由于對搭售的分析逐漸從本身違法向合理原則轉變,單一產品判斷的重要性降低,并不可避免地和競爭效果的實質判斷相結合。因此,在處理單一產品問題時,可以在簡單區(qū)分搭售品和被搭售品市場的基礎上,直接分析行為的競爭效果,避免單一產品判斷上的標準沖突。
[Abstract]:Single product analysis is considered to be a prerequisite to determine whether illegal tie-up sales are valid or not. At present, China adopts functional standard, demand standard and trading habit standard respectively, which raises the question of how to set the optimal standard. Single product standard is controversial in theory, and it is difficult to form a widely accepted standard of judgment. Therefore, it is necessary to seek solutions from the legal meaning of a single product itself. Tie-in sale is only the product of antitrust law theory, though it is easy to analyze, it may cause some unnecessary confusion. As the analysis of tie-in gradually changes from illegal to reasonable principle, the importance of single product judgment is reduced, and it is inevitable to combine it with the essential judgment of competition effect. Therefore, when dealing with the problem of single product, we can analyze the competitive effect of behavior directly on the basis of simply distinguishing the market of goods sold and sold, and avoid the standard conflict in the judgment of single product.
【作者單位】： 上海交通大學凱原法學院;
【基金】：國家社科基金青年項目“零售壟斷的法律規(guī)制研究”(項目編號:11CFX039)的階段性成果
【分類號】：D922.294

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 李劍;;MSN搭售和單一產品問題[J];網絡法律評論;2004年02期

2 ;[J];;年期

3 ;[J];;年期

4 ;[J];;年期

5 ;[J];;年期

6 ;[J];;年期

7 ;[J];;年期

8 ;[J];;年期

9 ;[J];;年期

10 ;[J];;年期

，

本文編號：2440050