【摘要】： 隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化、貿(mào)易與投資的自由化，市場已超越國內(nèi)的空間向世界范圍內(nèi)擴(kuò)展，跨國壟斷行為對內(nèi)國經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的影響日益突出，在國際反壟斷法缺位的情況下，許多國家轉(zhuǎn)而求助于本國的反壟斷法的域外適用，以國內(nèi)法律調(diào)整影響本國的國際壟斷和限制競爭行為。隨著我國經(jīng)濟(jì)實(shí)力的日益增強(qiáng)，隨著我國正是成為世界貿(mào)易組織的一員，我國將更大規(guī)模和更加頻繁地參加到國際經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易中去，國際市場的壟斷行為對我國的市場的影響日益明顯，為了維護(hù)我國的經(jīng)濟(jì)主權(quán)和經(jīng)濟(jì)利益，為了提高我國在反壟斷法域外適用方面的國際合作能力，我國確立反壟斷法域外適用不僅是必要的也是可行的。 我國規(guī)定反壟斷法的域外適用既沒有理論上的障礙，也是實(shí)踐的需要。但我國反壟斷法域外適用應(yīng)遵循何種原則是其制度確立必須首先要解決的問題。通過對美國、歐盟等反壟斷法域外適用原則的分析和借鑒，筆者認(rèn)為我國的反壟斷法域外適用制度應(yīng)遵循“效果主義理論”。但在適用“效果原則”的過程中，必須對其進(jìn)行必要的限制并使之具體明確，同時(shí)要充分利用效果加自然連接點(diǎn)，，盡量使之符合國際管轄權(quán)的有關(guān)規(guī)定。在立法上優(yōu)化設(shè)計(jì)，使效果原則運(yùn)用更具合理性。由于適用效果原則進(jìn)行域外管轄，常常遇到抵制，因此，我國在遵循效果理論的前提下，應(yīng)以合理管轄原則為指導(dǎo)，即在執(zhí)行中注重“利益平衡原則”和“禮讓原則”，從而盡量地緩和域外適用的矛盾和沖突。又由于境外限制競爭具有多種形式，為了更有效地進(jìn)行域外管轄和使之更具有國際法依據(jù)，我國在域外管轄中應(yīng)優(yōu)先適用“單一經(jīng)濟(jì)體原則”和“履行地原則”。 在立法設(shè)計(jì)上，結(jié)合反壟斷法域外適用的特點(diǎn)和其他國家的經(jīng)驗(yàn)，筆者認(rèn)為，我國應(yīng)采用立法機(jī)關(guān)的概括性立法和執(zhí)行機(jī)關(guān)的實(shí)施細(xì)則相結(jié)合的模式。 在我國反壟斷法域外適用過程中，不可避免地在管轄權(quán)，證據(jù)的收集，判決的承認(rèn)和執(zhí)行等方面引起沖突，因此，我國應(yīng)加強(qiáng)雙邊、區(qū)域和多邊合作來協(xié)調(diào)反壟斷法域外適用中的矛盾和沖突。在當(dāng)前反壟斷域外合作的多種主張中，我國可以接受WTO競爭規(guī)則的核心原則。
[Abstract]:With the globalization of economy and the liberalization of trade and investment, the market has expanded beyond the domestic space to the world, and the influence of transnational monopoly on the economic development of domestic countries has become more and more prominent. In the absence of international anti-monopoly law, the international anti-monopoly law is absent. Many countries turn to the extraterritorial application of their own antitrust laws and adjust their domestic laws to influence their international monopoly and restrict their competition behavior. With the increasing economic strength of our country and the fact that our country is a member of the World Trade Organization, China will participate in international economic trade on a larger scale and more frequently. The monopoly behavior of international market has more and more obvious influence on our country's market. In order to safeguard our country's economic sovereignty and benefit, to improve our country's ability of international cooperation in the extraterritorial application of anti-monopoly law, It is not only necessary but also feasible to establish the extraterritorial application of anti-monopoly law in China. There are no theoretical obstacles to the extraterritorial application of anti-monopoly law in our country, and it is also the need of practice. However, what principles should be followed in the extraterritorial application of antimonopoly law is the first problem to be solved in the establishment of its system. Based on the analysis and reference of the principles of extraterritorial application of anti-monopoly laws such as the United States and the European Union, the author holds that the extraterritorial application system of anti-monopoly law in China should follow the "theory of effectivism". However, in the process of applying the "effect principle", it is necessary to restrict it and make it specific, at the same time, we must make full use of the effect and natural connection point to make it conform to the relevant provisions of international jurisdiction as far as possible. Optimize the design in the legislation, make the effect principle use more reasonable. Due to the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the principle of application of effect, it is often met with resistance. Therefore, under the premise of following the theory of effect, our country should be guided by the principle of reasonable jurisdiction, that is, we should pay attention to the principle of balance of interests and the principle of comity in the implementation of the principle. Thus as far as possible to ease the extraterritorial application of contradictions and conflicts. In order to carry out extraterritorial jurisdiction more effectively and to make it have more international legal basis, China should give priority to the application of "single economy principle" and "place of performance principle" in extraterritorial jurisdiction. In the legislative design, combined with the characteristics of the extraterritorial application of anti-monopoly law and the experience of other countries, the author believes that our country should adopt the model of combining the general legislation of the legislative organ with the implementing rules of the executive organ. In the process of extraterritorial application of anti-monopoly law in China, conflicts inevitably arise in the aspects of jurisdiction, collection of evidence, recognition and enforcement of judgments, etc. Therefore, our country should strengthen bilateral, Regional and multilateral cooperation to coordinate the extraterritorial application of anti-monopoly law contradictions and conflicts. In the current anti-monopoly foreign cooperation, China can accept the core principle of WTO competition rules.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：安徽大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2007
【分類號】：D922.294

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 劉曄婧;論反壟斷法的域外適用[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2011年

2 鹿欣;反壟斷法域外適用問題研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2010年

本文編號：2306947