【摘要】：敏感案件是影響社會(huì)穩(wěn)定的訴訟事件,通常是個(gè)案敏感化后的結(jié)果。文章認(rèn)為廣西海上"彭宇案"的適格爭(zhēng)議是事實(shí)上的不適格,但更大問(wèn)題是,個(gè)案不適格卻被判定適格,這是個(gè)案敏感化的重要原因。解決適格問(wèn)題,是為阻止個(gè)案敏感化,關(guān)鍵在治理法官的錯(cuò)漏觀念——漏訟,這需要有恰當(dāng)?shù)挠^念與行動(dòng)并舉。
[Abstract]:Sensitive cases are litigation events that affect social stability and are usually the result of case sensitivity. This paper holds that the controversy over the suitability of Peng Yu case in Guangxi Sea is a de facto discomfort case, but the bigger problem is that the case discomfort case is judged to be appropriate, which is an important reason for the case sensitivity. The key to solve the problem is to prevent the case from becoming more sensitive. The key lies in the misconception and omission of the judge, which requires proper ideas and actions.
【作者單位】： 廣西大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】：D925.1;D922.294

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李寶珍;論醫(yī)療美容案件中原告適格的擴(kuò)張[J];四川警官高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2003年03期

2 陳鐘婧;;論當(dāng)事人更換的條件及其效力[J];貴州警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年02期

3 朱志權(quán);張寅;;公益訴訟的瓶頸問(wèn)題分析——論對(duì)傳統(tǒng)原告適格理論的突破[J];理論月刊;2010年03期

4 陳成建;論當(dāng)事人程序適格——以案例為視角[J];中國(guó)司法;2003年08期

5 潘t，

本文編號(hào)：2216546