【摘要】：公司實(shí)際破產(chǎn)時(shí)一般債權(quán)人利益往往受到侵害,法律課以董事對(duì)一般債權(quán)人的義務(wù)是解決該問題的重要方式之一。西方國(guó)家法律對(duì)此有所規(guī)定。初步看來(lái),我國(guó)法律亦有相關(guān)規(guī)定。但是,進(jìn)一步分析表明,這些規(guī)定并沒有明確公司實(shí)際破產(chǎn)時(shí)董事的相關(guān)義務(wù),也沒有真正起到保護(hù)一般債權(quán)人和維護(hù)債權(quán)人公平清償原則的作用。故在比較法研究的基礎(chǔ)上,筆者建議,我國(guó)應(yīng)對(duì)相關(guān)法律進(jìn)行改革,明確規(guī)定公司實(shí)際破產(chǎn)時(shí)董事應(yīng)承擔(dān)保護(hù)一般債權(quán)人利益的義務(wù),并完善對(duì)債權(quán)人的救濟(jì)、在公司實(shí)際破產(chǎn)時(shí)引進(jìn)債權(quán)人代表訴訟制度。
[Abstract]:The interests of the general creditors are often infringed when the company is actually bankrupt. The obligation of the directors to the general creditors is one of the important ways to solve this problem. Western laws provide for this. The preliminary view, our country law also has the correlation stipulation. However, further analysis shows that these provisions do not clarify the relevant obligations of directors at the time of the actual bankruptcy of the company, nor do they really play a role in protecting general creditors and safeguarding the principle of fair discharge of creditors. Therefore, on the basis of comparative law research, the author suggests that our country should reform the relevant laws and make it clear that the directors should assume the obligation to protect the interests of the general creditors and perfect the relief to the creditors when the company actually goes bankrupt. In the actual bankruptcy of the company the introduction of creditor representative litigation system.
【作者單位】： 復(fù)旦大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：國(guó)家社會(huì)科學(xué)基金青年項(xiàng)目“公司董事對(duì)債權(quán)人責(zé)任的法律制度研究”(項(xiàng)目編號(hào):10CFX069)的研究成果
【分類號(hào)】：D922.291.92

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 魏改蓮,王軍宏;完善我國(guó)獨(dú)立董事法律制度研究[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2002年04期

2 徐進(jìn);我國(guó)董事責(zé)任保險(xiǎn)的現(xiàn)狀分析[J];廣西經(jīng)濟(jì)管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年04期

3 朱豐慧;論我國(guó)董事責(zé)任保險(xiǎn)存在的問題及完善[J];中共南昌市委黨校學(xué)報(bào);2004年04期

4 路廣;論獨(dú)立董事的獨(dú)立性[J];韶關(guān)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年02期

5 張昊;李震東;;論董事責(zé)任的豁免機(jī)制[J];重慶工商大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年04期

6 董昱;;淺論董事責(zé)任保險(xiǎn)及其在我國(guó)的發(fā)展[J];法制與社會(huì);2006年15期

7 李云伍;;淺議公司董事責(zé)任保險(xiǎn)問題[J];知識(shí)經(jīng)濟(jì);2011年05期

8 王洪強(qiáng);;論我國(guó)董事責(zé)任的限制與免除[J];湖北經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2012年04期

9 謝亞婷;;淺議公司董事的責(zé)任[J];環(huán)渤海經(jīng)濟(jì)w，

本文編號(hào)：2178267