【摘要】：商標產(chǎn)品平行進口是指在某一特定產(chǎn)品的商標已獲進口國法律保護,并且國外商標權(quán)利人已在該國自己或授權(quán)他人制造或銷售的情況下,進口商未經(jīng)授權(quán)擅自從境外進口并在本國銷售該商標產(chǎn)品的行為。商標產(chǎn)品平行進口反映了錯綜復(fù)雜的利益關(guān)系:從國家對外交往層面來說,涉及進口國國家與出口國國家之間的利益關(guān)系;涉及維護本國企業(yè)與限制跨國企業(yè)之間的利益關(guān)系,對貿(mào)易保護主義的限制程度和對貿(mào)易自由主義的擴張勢態(tài)會影響該國在國際關(guān)系國際社會的地位;從本國國內(nèi)經(jīng)濟發(fā)展層面來看,涉及國內(nèi)商標權(quán)利人、平行進口商、消費者等不同主體當事人之間的利益,對私人利益的鼓勵和對公共利益的保護會直接影響不同當事人的直接效益。它融合了本國立法和雙邊多邊條約;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的理論和國際貿(mào)易的實踐等綜合性問題。與私人利益不同,平行進口的合法性問題還涉及到上游的國家政策、國家經(jīng)濟導(dǎo)向,國際貿(mào)易平衡,外交手段等相關(guān)問題,僅僅從法律的角度怕無法分析周全,而專業(yè)背景為國際貿(mào)易、國際經(jīng)濟的學(xué)者對該問題已做了詳盡的數(shù)據(jù)分析可進行參考。綜合學(xué)者的討論,目前我國的大環(huán)境適于對平行進口持寬容態(tài)度。結(jié)合日本已經(jīng)形成的成熟的平行進口合法性的判斷方法/依據(jù),本文通過對各要件進行深入研究和分析,提出除了從“權(quán)利窮竭、地域性”等知識產(chǎn)權(quán)原則性之外,在合法性的判斷要件上,以日本的三要件為基礎(chǔ),結(jié)合我國的國情,對三要件原則之外做出例外規(guī)定:例如實質(zhì)性差異例外、合同許可例外等。在司法實踐中先行一步,由最高院出臺司法解釋,來確認商標產(chǎn)品平行進口的合法性,等時機成熟后,再進行立法補充。
[Abstract]:Parallel import of trademark products means that when the trademark of a particular product has been protected by the law of the importing country and the foreign trademark owner has manufactured or sold it in that country or authorized others, The importer's unauthorized import from abroad and the sale of the trademark product in his own country. The parallel import of trademark products reflects the complex interest relationship: from the aspect of the country's external relations, it involves the interest relationship between the importing country and the exporting country, and involves the maintenance of the interest relationship between the domestic enterprise and the restricted multinational enterprise. The extent of restrictions on trade protectionism and the expansion of trade liberalism will affect the country's position in the international community in international relations; in terms of domestic economic development, it involves domestic trademark rights holders, parallel importers, The interests of different parties such as consumers, the encouragement of private interests and the protection of public interests will directly affect the direct benefits of different parties. It combines national legislation with bilateral multilateral treaties, the theory of intellectual property and the practice of international trade. Unlike private interests, the legality of parallel imports also involves issues related to upstream national policies, national economic orientation, international trade balance, diplomatic means, and so on, which cannot be fully analyzed from a legal perspective alone. The professional background is international trade, and scholars of international economics have made detailed data analysis on this issue for reference. Comprehensive scholar's discussion, at present our country's big environment is suitable to hold the tolerant attitude to the parallel import. Combined with the mature judgment method / basis of the legitimacy of parallel import in Japan, this paper, through in-depth study and analysis of the various elements, puts forward that in addition to the principle of intellectual property rights, such as "exhaustion of rights, regionalism", etc. On the basis of the three elements of Japan and the national conditions of our country, this paper makes an exception to the principle of legality, such as the exception of substantial difference, the exception of contract permission, and so on. In judicial practice, the Supreme Court issued a judicial interpretation to confirm the legitimacy of parallel import of trademark products.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D922.295

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王曉賀;;論平行進口的合法性[J];湖北函授大學(xué)學(xué)報;2016年16期

2 朱翔;;商標許可中的質(zhì)量控制標準[J];中華商標;2016年08期

3 譚再坤;;現(xiàn)貨代購商標侵權(quán)與例外[J];湖北警官學(xué)院學(xué)報;2016年01期

4 王心陽;;電商時代商標平行進口的合法性分析(上)[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2016年01期

5 姚新超;;進口商品國內(nèi)銷售中的商標侵權(quán)爭議啟示與借鑒[J];國際貿(mào)易;2015年03期

6 郭軍濤;郭靜;;商標侵權(quán)案件中被控侵權(quán)者合法來源抗辯的認定[J];中華商標;2015年02期

7 劉維;;商標識別功能損害判定研究[J];知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2014年09期

8 于凱旋;;歐盟商標產(chǎn)品的平行進口問題分析[J];電子知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2013年03期

9 李士林;;商標質(zhì)量功能論爭與立法抉擇[J];法治研究;2013年02期

10 田村善之;張鵬;;商標法所保護的利益[J];法律適用;2012年10期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前2條

1 施小雪;;平行進口中的商標侵權(quán)判定[N];中國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)報;2015年

2 胡宓;;非典型性平行進口中的商標侵權(quán)認定[N];中國知識產(chǎn)權(quán)報;2013年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 馬樂;國際知識產(chǎn)權(quán)貿(mào)易中平行進口法律規(guī)制研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2010年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 黃亦楙;論商標的平行進口[D];華東政法大學(xué);2012年

2 常凱;我國商標平行進口問題研究[D];南京師范大學(xué);2012年

3 劉云川;商標產(chǎn)品平行進口相關(guān)法律問題研究[D];上海社會科學(xué)院;2007年

，

本文編號：2155308