論外資并購的反壟斷規(guī)制
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-07-31 13:16
【摘要】：外資并購,對于大多數(shù)人來說并不是一個(gè)陌生的詞匯,特別是2008年的可口可樂并購匯源一案讓外資并購成為了當(dāng)時(shí)的熱點(diǎn)。近年來我國的外資并購數(shù)量的不斷增加,規(guī)模仍在繼續(xù)的擴(kuò)大,《反壟斷法》自頒布以來,在外資并購的范圍內(nèi)創(chuàng)造了良好的市場競爭環(huán)境也保障了我國社會主義經(jīng)濟(jì)的健康發(fā)展。今年是《反壟斷》實(shí)施的第七個(gè)年頭,如何更好的利用《反壟斷法》和其他相關(guān)法律對我國外資并購進(jìn)行規(guī)制,如何更好地提高我國利用外資的能力,成為了每一個(gè)法律人都應(yīng)該思考的問題。本文包括引言、正文五個(gè)部分和結(jié)論。引言:簡要介紹了論文的寫作背景以及研究對象;對論文所查閱的相關(guān)領(lǐng)域的文獻(xiàn)資料、主要觀點(diǎn)進(jìn)行了綜述;交待了論文的研究方法和研究意義。第一部分:介紹了外資并購的基本問題,其中包括外資并購的含義,以及本文所稱的并購與《反壟斷法》意義上的“經(jīng)營者集中”的關(guān)系。在這一部分還介紹了外資并購的基本類型和現(xiàn)階段的特點(diǎn)。第二部分:分析我國對外資并購進(jìn)行反壟斷規(guī)制的必要性,以及其經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)和法理學(xué)上的依據(jù)。第三部分:通過梳理我國現(xiàn)階段對外資并購進(jìn)行規(guī)制的法律法規(guī),總結(jié)歸納出我國外資并購反壟斷規(guī)制方面的不足,這些不足主要包括立法體系方面的不足,以及實(shí)體和程序方面的不足。第四部分:通過介紹美國和歐盟的相關(guān)法律法規(guī),對這兩個(gè)地區(qū)的外資并購反壟斷情況進(jìn)行比較分析。第五部分:通過借鑒國外的立法以及實(shí)踐情況,達(dá)到本文的寫作目的——完善我國的外資并購反壟斷的相關(guān)制度,結(jié)合國外制度和前任的研究狀況,提出了自己的建議。結(jié)論:對我國的外資并購案件進(jìn)行反壟斷規(guī)制,首先要解決法律制度上存在的一些問題,雖然《反壟斷法》已經(jīng)實(shí)施了七年,但其暴露的問題并沒有得到解決,只有不斷完善這些法律制度存在的不足,才能更好的讓其服務(wù)于我國的外資并購行為,才能對我國的社會主義經(jīng)濟(jì)建設(shè)保駕護(hù)航。
[Abstract]:Foreign M & A is not a strange word for most people, especially the Coca-Cola merger and acquisition of Huiyuan in 2008 made foreign M & A a hot spot at that time. In recent years, the number of foreign capital mergers and acquisitions in China has been increasing, and the scale is still expanding. Since the promulgation of the Anti-Monopoly Law, In the scope of foreign M & A, it creates a good market competition environment and ensures the healthy development of China's socialist economy. This year is the seventh year of the implementation of "Anti-monopoly". How to make better use of the Anti-monopoly Law and other relevant laws to regulate foreign capital mergers and acquisitions, and how to better improve the ability of our country to use foreign capital. It has become a problem that every legal person should think about. This article includes the introduction, the body five parts and the conclusion. Introduction: this paper briefly introduces the writing background and research object of the paper, summarizes the literature and main points of view of the related fields consulted in the paper, and describes the research methods and significance of the paper. The first part introduces the basic problems of foreign capital M & A, including the meaning of foreign capital M & A, and the relationship between M & A and "concentration of managers" in the sense of "Anti-monopoly Law". This part also introduces the basic types of foreign M & A and the characteristics of the present stage. The second part analyzes the necessity of anti-monopoly regulation of foreign capital M & A and the basis of its economics and jurisprudence. The third part: through combing the laws and regulations of foreign capital merger and acquisition regulation at the present stage of our country, summing up the deficiency of our country's foreign capital merger and acquisition anti-monopoly regulation, these shortcomings mainly include the insufficiency of the legislative system. As well as physical and procedural deficiencies. Part IV: by introducing the relevant laws and regulations of the United States and the European Union, this paper makes a comparative analysis of the situation of foreign M & A in these two regions. The fifth part: through drawing lessons from the legislation and practice of foreign countries, to achieve the writing purpose of this article-to perfect the foreign merger and acquisition antitrust system in China, combined with the foreign system and the former research situation, put forward their own suggestions. Conclusion: in order to regulate the foreign capital M & A cases in China, we must first solve some problems in the legal system. Although the Anti-Monopoly Law has been implemented for seven years, the exposed problems have not been solved. Only by constantly perfecting the shortcomings of these legal systems, can we better let them serve the foreign capital M & A behavior of our country, and guarantee the socialist economic construction of our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D922.294
[Abstract]:Foreign M & A is not a strange word for most people, especially the Coca-Cola merger and acquisition of Huiyuan in 2008 made foreign M & A a hot spot at that time. In recent years, the number of foreign capital mergers and acquisitions in China has been increasing, and the scale is still expanding. Since the promulgation of the Anti-Monopoly Law, In the scope of foreign M & A, it creates a good market competition environment and ensures the healthy development of China's socialist economy. This year is the seventh year of the implementation of "Anti-monopoly". How to make better use of the Anti-monopoly Law and other relevant laws to regulate foreign capital mergers and acquisitions, and how to better improve the ability of our country to use foreign capital. It has become a problem that every legal person should think about. This article includes the introduction, the body five parts and the conclusion. Introduction: this paper briefly introduces the writing background and research object of the paper, summarizes the literature and main points of view of the related fields consulted in the paper, and describes the research methods and significance of the paper. The first part introduces the basic problems of foreign capital M & A, including the meaning of foreign capital M & A, and the relationship between M & A and "concentration of managers" in the sense of "Anti-monopoly Law". This part also introduces the basic types of foreign M & A and the characteristics of the present stage. The second part analyzes the necessity of anti-monopoly regulation of foreign capital M & A and the basis of its economics and jurisprudence. The third part: through combing the laws and regulations of foreign capital merger and acquisition regulation at the present stage of our country, summing up the deficiency of our country's foreign capital merger and acquisition anti-monopoly regulation, these shortcomings mainly include the insufficiency of the legislative system. As well as physical and procedural deficiencies. Part IV: by introducing the relevant laws and regulations of the United States and the European Union, this paper makes a comparative analysis of the situation of foreign M & A in these two regions. The fifth part: through drawing lessons from the legislation and practice of foreign countries, to achieve the writing purpose of this article-to perfect the foreign merger and acquisition antitrust system in China, combined with the foreign system and the former research situation, put forward their own suggestions. Conclusion: in order to regulate the foreign capital M & A cases in China, we must first solve some problems in the legal system. Although the Anti-Monopoly Law has been implemented for seven years, the exposed problems have not been solved. Only by constantly perfecting the shortcomings of these legal systems, can we better let them serve the foreign capital M & A behavior of our country, and guarantee the socialist economic construction of our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：D922.294
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 ;中國年內(nèi)陸續(xù)出臺外資并購等法規(guī)[J];中國橡膠;2002年20期
2 何焰;關(guān)于我國外資并購的若干法律思考[J];天津市政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年04期
3 陳永生;新政策環(huán)境下外資并購國有企業(yè)的思考[J];勝利油田黨校學(xué)報(bào);2004年05期
4 廉恩臣;;對外資并購應(yīng)加強(qiáng)法律規(guī)制[J];法人雜志;2006年05期
5 黃俊峰;;外資并購引發(fā)擔(dān)憂《反壟斷法》出臺與否存在爭議[J];中國石油和化工;2006年06期
6 金伯生;;外資并購新規(guī)定七大看點(diǎn)[J];w攣胖蕓，
本文編號：2155694
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/jingjifalunwen/2155694.html
最近更新
教材專著
