本文選題：商人 + 責(zé)任�。� 參考：《商業(yè)經(jīng)濟研究》2015年04期

【摘要】：商人責(zé)任這一命題,內(nèi)涵雋永,不同學(xué)科領(lǐng)域定位迥異,即使在法學(xué)視域中,也難以形成對其邊界的統(tǒng)一厘清。商人應(yīng)當(dāng)擔(dān)負(fù)多大范圍的責(zé)任,是應(yīng)與自然人一樣只要做守法公民"不違法"即可太平無事,皆大歡喜,抑或是肩負(fù)更為積極、寬廣的社會責(zé)任?在商人觸犯法律時,是應(yīng)當(dāng)與普通民事主體一樣承擔(dān)補償性民事責(zé)任,抑或與之區(qū)別,進而承擔(dān)相較更為嚴(yán)苛的懲罰性商事責(zé)任?毋庸置疑,面對著復(fù)雜多變的市場經(jīng)濟,面對著唯利是圖、為富不仁現(xiàn)象的出現(xiàn),不得不讓人們急迫地、認(rèn)真地去深刻反思商人責(zé)任的這兩個"度量問題",前者稱之為商人責(zé)任的"維度",后者稱之為商人責(zé)任的"深度"。
[Abstract]:The proposition of businessman's responsibility has a meaningful connotation, and the orientation of different disciplines is very different. Even in the field of law, it is difficult to unify and clarify its boundary. What extent of responsibility should businessmen bear?. Should they, like natural persons, be "law-abiding" citizens to be peaceful and happy, or should they shoulder more active and broad social responsibilities?. When the businessman violates the law, should he assume the compensatory civil liability as the ordinary civil subject, or should he bear the more severe punitive commercial liability? There is no doubt that in the face of a complex and changeable market economy, facing the appearance of profit-seeking and inconsiderate phenomena, people have to make it urgent. The former is called the "dimension" of the responsibility of the businessman, and the latter is called the "depth" of the responsibility of the businessman.
【作者單位】： 沈陽師范大學(xué)法學(xué)院;沈陽市中級人民法院;
【基金】：2011年度遼寧省財政科研基金項目(11C036) 2013年度遼寧經(jīng)濟社會發(fā)展立項(2013lslktzifx-11)階段性成果
【分類號】：D922.291.91

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 茆藝宗;淺論民事主體[J];甘肅理論學(xué)刊;2003年06期

2 張曉鷗,吳一鳴;論“其他組織”的法律地位:兼論民事主體標(biāo)準(zhǔn)[J];南通職業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(綜合版);2003年02期

3 龔衛(wèi)東,馬q，

本文編號：1897220